davev8

the review did not pan the lens it say it was average ....i find most lens reviews  about right to my own findings ...not very often but some time i have 36 inch prints made..and i believe that a ...

i dont think canon will do it for that kind of price ....so far canon has resisted masking poor optics with in camera lens correction ......i cut and paste from photozone "While most RAW converter ...

Apparently Brian at TDP say its the only camera he try that will AF on individual stars .....thats impressive

without looking at the vid again i don't think they did this test ...a dark scene at high ISO

on my copy the borders  wide open are fine on FF ...yes the middle is sharper but nothing like the difference between edge and middle of say with the 50mm F1.8 at F1.8 .......wide open i wuld say ...

nice car........but did you not notice the steering wheel is coming out of the passenger side of the  dash when you got it back?

the 22 is a no brainer ..its cheap and sharp and compact ..and on the M50 will fit in a jacket pocket

yes as it will work seamlessly on the R ...it will be decades befor canon replace all the big white L glass with R mount ...and i bet the R mount stuff won't be cheaper

you did not see the complete story as some posts have been deleted ...the 1st reply to the OP was very rude and condescending

above the comments in the video if you click on see more they list the kit used and say the nikon lens was the nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S Lens

we could do with a fast 50mm prime..but in real life the the EF 50 f1.8 is not much bigger than the sony 50 1.8 oss...the EF lens is not the sharpest wide open non genuine one are cheap ..but you ...

apart from the 50F1.4 is what EF lenses are desperate to be updated ?

i like the fact that canon has put a full size grip on it

the R is mid size... it smaller than an 80D ..about the size of a rebel but with a slimmer body https://camerasize.com/compact/#660,799,707,ha,t

DPR say "The resulting combination would act as a 64mm F1.9 equivalent. Not quite as wide or with such a bright equivalent aperture as the full frame lens used on full frame

you correctly apply...

i hope the Viltrox for the M IS NOT superior to what Canon proposes as there are several reports of the Viltrox on the M being crap ...soft at the edgers

Kharn...i bet you are a flat earther ..you see irrefutable evidence the earth is a globe but still believe the earth is flat ...in the photozone MTF charts altogether there are 42 columns in the...

YES i think you have to edit a raw file in your favorite software to your taste before passing judgment....1 case i get flamed down in the DPR forums many years ago by suggesting that my new EOS ...

basically sony cook the raw files with some form of noise reduction that cannot be switched off and can mistake stars for noise and remove them ....canon dont do this

the problem is professional  testers look at their results and come up with the fact the Canon R will take terrible  photos ...but in real life they may be better than numbers say