davev8

once you are with sony why would you want to come back to canon ?

that only Tony managed to get .. i have seen other 5 stop push that has no banding me i don't do 5 stop push ..probably never go past 2 ... expose correctly and think photos with no shadows look ...

if you want low light abilerty the M5/50 is only a 1/3 of a stop better than your 1100D ,,an improvement but not life changing ,,the 6Dmk2 is a about 2 stops better that will be very noticeable i ...

yes it was pointed out several years ago canon is alway behind in tech and people will go elsewhere   ...well that has not happened ..sony is still floundering on 12-14% market share ...just like ...

looks amazing to me...but then the camera i am looking to upgrade is a 5Dmki...evan the 6Dmkii looks good for DR compared to it ...i think i will be very happy with the R

the A7iii is only 24mp  and it produces softer images than the R  see Tony Northrup's last vid ..the sony 85 is a very good lens.. i think you will find the canon 85 maybe a little softer at the ...

you say "the user migration will still continue to other brands"
What brand is that then?? its not sony as sony's market share has not budged since 2008...canon share went up not to long ago

should this not be in news and rumors

probably another body coming some time the 35mm f1.8 macro is only 500 you can use EF lense  just as well on the R..sharpness wise your 85F1.8 on 30MP probably not to far removed from the sony 85 ...

because maybe you buy a F1,4 because its a 1.4 you are going to compare to other F1.4
i am in the market for a 50f1.4 i won't look at F2 lenses as i want a 1.4

can you post an example...i would find it interesting.... thanks

maybe when you underexpose till 99% of the image is black ...how many would evan attempt a recovery if they had cocked up that badly ? i am pretty certain that in real life banding will be no ...

yes i was going to point that out but but realized i hadn't only until after i hit post obversely cannot compare it to the other 24-105 ..just see its an ok lens ..like the EF..which i had but was ...

i think the 18-150 is about the best super zoom going i guess you are familiar with the M 18-55 18-55 wide open at 55mm this is mid frame at the top and extreme carner at the bottom 16-55 at 55 18- ...

no they correlate to real world very well ..if there is not too much difference on the chart you will never see in real photos ...but say you quickly want to elevate a lens in this case i find all ...

as it has an usutable sensor for a milc  so it can get colour shifts towards the edge of the frame ...also it not AF that well with some EF lenses

sorry i spoke

sony colors have got much better i have a NEX3c and the green cast in a head shot is almost impossible to get rid off as it is not consent.... in the brighter  parts of the face its very light and ...

NO all EF lenses work just the same werther they are fitted to the R with an adapter or to a DSLR...all the adaptor is doing is making up for the shortfall of flange distance

properly as its not F1,4