Slaginfected

Ok, how is the T-stop affected by the lens size? Give me a good reason why my 35/1.4 Summilux is actually bad at gathering light compared to much larger 35/1.4 lenses. Also, my A7s eats light and ...

Magic Lantern. Things you can do with a camera, if you cared about the software running on it. Compare it to the official firmware provided by Canon. That is also, in a way, the solution to the ...

Given a specific technology (f.e. FIS, 180um, ...) you have an optimum in terms of pixel size vs. noise. Going with larger pixels will help with the higher ISOs but wont give the best result at ...

It depends on the stages, the available lighting setup and what the guy(s) at the controller board are able to pull out of all this. Usually it goes like that: The larger the stage, the better the ...

My brain is kind of split in that regard. One is focusing on the contents, while the other is going for the technical details. This leads to situations where I'm conflicted, i.e. the contents is ...

Which is kind of not surprising, if they reused the focus module. The bigger question is: How does this compare to the one of the 6D1? If you want to tell me that the cross focus points of the 6D2 ...

Wonderful picture! From a technical point of view the 5D4 seems to handle ISO10k visibly better than that ISO32k as well :) I haven't done much concert shooting myself as of late, not because of ...

The problem I see with all that math is: It is based on a lot of simplifications and assumptions. In reality, things are way more complicated, which starts already with the simple fact that lenses ...

The 35/1.7 Ultron has a very strong field curvature. I own the 35/1.4 Summilux, which has the very same issue(s) (and back then was the only good option for some small 35mm faster than f/2.8). Mean ...

Nice picture, and having looked at all the other posts in this thread you certainly know your deal with concert pictures. Love it. Anyway, one question: How much processing latitude do you have ...

The problem with all this radiation is that there are no safe levels, despite some people trying to convey this idea. The amount of mutations scales linearly with the amount of radiation (ignoring...

I happen to own the A7s for 3 years now, and I happen to have tested the A7rII various times (rental) in the situations I got me the A7s for in the first place. A7s > A7rII when it comes to low ...

I need the best low-light camera in a small format factor. You can bet on it that I got my hands on an A7rII as soon as possible to compare it with my A7s. I still own the A7s.

If you count ISO...

@Dr Blackjack: The A7rII is good, but when it comes to true low light performance, even the A7s will beat it. And that when taking pictures. For video it is even worse, because the better quality...

The topic is actually pretty complicated. There was an interview with one of the Sony guys recently, and he mentioned that for DR you have to raise the saturation capacity, while for sensitivity...

Now compare actual images with the original 6D and tell me which of these are more usable in the end, despite the same DR. Equally distributed noise compared to banding noise makes a big ...

Cameras usually pick up the numbering of images which are stored on the card already so they don't overwrite existing images. More important is the actual shutter count, which is sometimes stored ...

Eventually people will see that DR measurements contain absolutely no information about the type of noise and that even same DR can mean two totally different things in "real life". Thanks for ...

The way DR is always measured it leaves something I sometimes call "measurement hole" as in that the things are measured correctly, but it doesn't correlate entirely with what you'd expect from ...

To answer your question: No. Depending on how the data is processed in camera already and how well the post-processing software on your computer can deal with the data you may get this magenta ...