Slaginfected

You mean aside of the apparent noise, banding noise, and overall Instahipster color look? Yeah, works nicely ... There are other bodies around giving you better quality at this ISO easily. ...

10000 cycles actually for Micro (USB 2.0), which is what you find in many "older" cameras. That is over 26 years if you do it once daily. However, there are some additional conditions, and this ...

One question, though: It is actually baked into the RAW data or is the post-processing software doing auto-corrections already? I barely see anything else mentioned than LR, which is putting all ...

I work with early releases of high end SoCs and have seen a lot of impact on overall performance just by changed/better software. This stuff is complex on hardware level, so you need complex...

Even if things were perfectly "even" between the channels, you'd still get a desaturation, like crushed blacks, i.e. black is grey then instead of some purplish-blue. You'd still lack the details ...

You do have like 2 major noise "sources" in digital photography. One is the shot noise, which is a property of the light, and is the major contributing factor to what people call noise (aka grain) ...

First things first: I haven't used any of these cameras personally, and in case of R, Z7 and A7rIII also don't see any reason to do so, because I'm one of these few persons who really do need high ...

It is very difficult to determine the "best" (what does that mean in the first place?) chipset based on whatever large software stack you put on top of it.

Back in time I compared my 5D3 with the 5Ds just to see how the latter fares at higher ISOs. The 5D3 got me better results in the dark parts; both are using off-sensor ADCs, and neither has DR-Pix,...

@s1oth1ovechunk: I'm using the A7s from day 1 it was available. One thing which became evident fast was the large post-processing latitude even at higher ISOs. I can push ISO6400 files 3 stops no...

@PAntunes: Noone said you have to limit your larger pixels to old technology.

@Richard Butler: Well, aside of the fact that even in your example the A7rIII shows worse behavior, the key is to look...

The only problem with images/video is, that because of how a Bayer sensor works, you'd need quite insane resolutions to reach the Nyquist frequency in the first place (for red and blue). Means for...

When will this religion of "scale it down and all is the same!" finally die? Funnily enough, even in an interview here at DPR a Sony guy said that for better sensitivity -- and the A7s line stands...

Aquariums often have enough light to create reflections on the glass just by their own light already, and then it won't matter whether you fight with additional outside light sources or not, ...

Maybe a few points here: (1) Many mirrorless cameras can be charged via USB. Means you can dump whatever battery charger (if there even one coming with the camera in the first place), shaving off some ...

If you want to make things easier visible, it helps "flipping" between the different cameras, i.e. same scaled images at the same spot and then changing between cameras. The same approach can be ...

You have pixels with a lower SNR. Lower SNR also means higher relative noise (alone by shot noise), so the variance from the actual input is higher. You use this lower SNR to do demosaicing, to do ...

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/61806550

From my experience, the cameras are often doing pretty well in such circumstances, at least regarding the RAW data. Means it also depends on the camera, its metering system and algorithms and the ...

Well, the discussion kind of hinted at it already. In regard to shot noise it will be at most 2 stops higher, assuming either only red or blue get to the saturation point only. So it cannot be ...