Lives in Congo Congo
Joined on Jun 20, 2011
About me:

A question was posed to Dalai Lama:
"What is the thing about humanity that surprises you the most?"
His answer was as follows:
"Man" - Because he sacrifices his health in order to make money.
Then he sacrifices his money to recuperate his health.
And then he is so anxious about the future that he doesn't enjoy the present,
And as a result he doesn't live in the present or the future. And he
lives as if he's never going to die, and then he dies having never really lived.”


Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6
On article Just posted: Our in-depth Olympus E-PL3 review (45 comments in total)

Potentially awkward handling with the control dial, a disappointing noise reduction/sharpening default and and a digital image stabilization system (for video) that can produce less than pleasing results prevent the E-PL3 from receiving our Gold Award.

What a stupid comment..........the G3 kicks this camera out of the ball my question is with the G3 scoring 75% what stopped it from getting a Gold award ???
Must be a yawning gap somewhere and I just wished these reviewers would be consistant in their assumptions.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2011 at 05:23 UTC as 1st comment

I don't think EVF will take off .Personally having used both systems EVF is a pain in the proverbial,inacurrate and slow.
Sure, mirrorless is the way they will head but I firmly believe that an alternative to the EVF will produce a much better mirrorless camera as the EVF is not the answer.
I predicted that Canon and Nikon would venture into mirrorless designs months ago ,but only when they started to see a drop in sales.
I also predict that they will come up with a much better option than an EVF.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2011 at 12:59 UTC as 10th comment | 3 replies

you guys are blind, there is clearly more noise at iso1600 with the Panasonic.

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2011 at 14:19 UTC as 6th comment

Oh boy the Canon wins easy the Nikon only gets it award because of the Bias shown in reviews to the Nikon..they must be paying the bills.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2011 at 11:09 UTC as 29th comment | 2 replies

So, does that mean the photos were done out of camera using raw file processing on the computer??
i can't see any other way , raw is raw that is my understanding , no processing until you drag it out onto the desktop into raw processing software ?
i dont think this camera shoots a raw image and a jpeg at the same time ?

Wikipedia Translation needs some clarifying:

camera raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor of either a digital camera, image or motion picture film scanner. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. Normally, the image is processed by a raw converter in a wide-gamut internal colorspace where precise adjustments can be made before conversion to a "positive" file format such as camera raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor of either a digital camera, image or motion picture film scanner.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2011 at 10:57 UTC as 29th comment | 4 replies

I don't get it, .so how do you reprocess something that has already been processed?
Wasn't the processing done by the camera on those setting when the shot was first taken?
How do you undo the processing ?

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2011 at 09:16 UTC as 30th comment | 1 reply
Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6