LensBeginner

LensBeginner

Lives in Italy Italy
Joined on Jan 23, 2012

Comments

Total: 776, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Lan: In other news, water is found to be wet...

...or the fact that they recalled the faulty Note 7, and the units in which the issue had supposedly been corrected started exploding as well...

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2017 at 20:37 UTC
In reply to:

munro harrap: Dan, it is not ridiculous at all: the majority of people fail to register that photography IS all about the light ("And God saw the Light that it was good and divided the Light from the darkness"etc)
Akhenaton, and Turner, and me too regard the Sun as God, just as the Hindus and yes, the Japanese do- "the land of the Rising Sun" Danny boy!!

The only tragedy involved here other than the failure to realize simple longstanding truths and beliefs as even relevant is Nikon's failure to pack their precision goods properly in foam cut-outs inside decent strong boxes, so that our machinery cannot be damaged in transit.

Other than that it is one of the planet's most important companies, and it is an amazing company, here maybe trying to clue you into what thay want as competition entries!!

Yeah, that thing about the sun dying and resurrecting after 3 days of apparent lack of movement (hence, "death"), on the 25th of December, from the constellation of the Virgo.

...oh, wait... :-P

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 17:51 UTC
In reply to:

LensBeginner: Focus and recompose...

I don't have lots of unsharp pictures, as a matter of fact.
OTOH, the focus and recompose scenario also applies to large-DoF situations, and in those cases the plugin is kinda useless.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 18:57 UTC

Focus and recompose...

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 21:33 UTC as 15th comment | 2 replies

Not really "inexpensive" IMHO...

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 18:58 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

Frank C.: He talks Italian without dialect or at least the version taught in school, wouldn't mind sharing an espresso with this giovanotto, he seems like a great guy.

If they are considered languages, they cease to be dialects, so the difference still stands...

'un ti preoccupare brodino costì, che so d'icché sto parlando ;-)

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2017 at 10:09 UTC
In reply to:

Frank C.: He talks Italian without dialect or at least the version taught in school, wouldn't mind sharing an espresso with this giovanotto, he seems like a great guy.

Yes and no.
1. yes he talks only with a slight Milanese accent, which is apparent mainly in the vowels.

2. dialects are only variants of the Italian language: perhaps you were thinking about Sardinian or Friulan which are full-fledged languages and are talked in the Italian peninsula/islands. OTOH, Neapolitan, just to name one, is a dialect of Italian.

Link | Posted on Dec 31, 2016 at 17:57 UTC

The "ca(n)nons" are those you usually see near a soccer/football/athletics fields... might be difficult to shoot a wedding with a 500mm f/4...

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2016 at 21:25 UTC as 281st comment
In reply to:

T3: I can't imagine this ever working. Aperture blades in a lens slide over one another in an overlapping fashion. That's what allows the aperture iris to change in size. This wrench doesn't do that, and even if it did do that, the aperture "blades" would never be strong enough to handle the torque demands of a wrench. It's a cute idea, but it'll never work in real life. It might work as an art piece, though.

Agreed, it will work, but IMHO the blades will open up under torque.
Universal wrenches as we know them have either a very stiff helicoid, or are self-tightening like the ones with the grip and the hook that come in pairs and are used for pipes.

Link | Posted on Dec 24, 2016 at 10:32 UTC

...the cream of the cr@p...

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2016 at 13:42 UTC as 80th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

KiwiDon: Pentax K1 for $971. Better get in quick!

Scary...
...but the fact that scammers go through the trouble of listing a /Pentax/ camera means that Pentax is becoming mainstream... :-P

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2016 at 22:12 UTC
In reply to:

KiwiDon: Pentax K1 for $971. Better get in quick!

I don't get your humor... apart from the rhyme :-P

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2016 at 09:31 UTC
In reply to:

tom1234567: Just got rid of Adobe LR AND PP today
I now use on1Photo Raw instead of LR,
and the new Affinity for windows released today in place of PP.

so Adobe no more monies from me,
the LR done nothing for the Fuji jpeg problems
I have the Fuji X-T2 and the D7200 and the new programs handle the files with no problems
I think a few more users will be leaving Adobe soon

Tom G

Photo...Phop?

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2016 at 20:54 UTC
In reply to:

LegacyGT: For anyone else confused by how a single lens camera can capture a 360 view.
I did the extra investigation and discover this camera has a 220 degree FOV wide angle lens that is designed to be pointed straight up... so it has a 360 degree in 2D.

Most other "360" cameras (Ricoh Theta, Nikon KeyMission, Insta360 Nano, Samsung Gear360,etc) offer a 360* in 3D (i.e. spherical view) via two ~180 FOV lenses stitched together.

If you thought "well obviously," sorry I wasn't so quick on the uptake as you.

...the power of marketing! :)

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2016 at 10:06 UTC
On article Lensrentals tears down the Nikon 105mm F1.4 (157 comments in total)

A very interesting and well-done blog post.

I like better and old but practical design, than a newer, less repairable one.

My bet is on the marketing department knowing next to anything and just blowing his own trumpet.

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2016 at 21:19 UTC as 25th comment
In reply to:

WillWeaverRVA: "The 64GB version will set you back approximately $435 while the 128GB requires an investment of $480."

I'm not sure why anyone would want to buy the 64GB version...

There it is: iphone 7 32GB was slower than the 64 and 128GB versions (39.6, 200.6 and 308MB/s respectively).

A real-life test however showed that a copy of a 5' 4K video took about a minute on both 32GB and 64GB variants (52" and 1' respectively), and just 17" on the 128GB model.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2016 at 01:40 UTC
In reply to:

Melchiorum: It seems like the smartphone market has hit a wall and has not been going anywhere for past couple of years. Everyone keeps releasing the same product with the same faceless design and pretty much the same specs. A bit thinner, a bit faster processor, a bit better camera, a bit brighter screen... A bit, a bit, a bit. Well, some have added a second camera gimmick which no one really needs that much. Even the new iPhone was pretty much the same as previous one.

The only somewhat interesting phone was Mi Mix by Xiaomi of all companies, but it's only available in China.

Yup, it has reached a plateau since some time... moreover there is no obvious benefit in choosing a "better" model anymore, as it was the case just some years ago... mid-range is more than sufficient for almost everyone, including geeks.

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2016 at 23:02 UTC
In reply to:

WillWeaverRVA: "The 64GB version will set you back approximately $435 while the 128GB requires an investment of $480."

I'm not sure why anyone would want to buy the 64GB version...

Well, if the only difference is storage, then 32GB could be enough...

In general a version with more storage is made with a little more RAM, or even a non-declared difference in trasnfer speed (it happened recently with iphones, IIRC), in order to give the buyer an incentive to choose the better model.

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2016 at 23:00 UTC
On article Shaking up the market: Pentax K-70 Review (342 comments in total)
In reply to:

Adam Sharp: Pentax great value for money

@rrccad it could be only 50g... the global weight difference also could come from the fact that Pentax cameras are usually built like tanks, even entry-level ones.

I held a Canon once and it was very toy-like, with plasticky look & feel, wobbling controls etc.
The simplest ones from Pentax (I own a K100Ds and a K-01) are sturdy and have a strong metal frame.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2016 at 18:53 UTC
In reply to:

Biowizard: PS: That thing is going to get HOT without adequate heat-sinking.

Brian

[edit] - and for me, a surfboard and the ocean does not qualify as heat sinking ...

...it depends how much weight you put on said surfboard (otherwise it's heat floating)

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2016 at 21:07 UTC
Total: 776, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »