stevevp

I thought that was the 100-400mm f5-6.3 lens.

I'd like to see the colourisations and paintings in a separate techniques forum.

There seem to be many reviews on YouTube which might have the answer: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jpeg+to+raw+ai+topaz+review+

Wasn't it also illegal to take them out the country?

A few of mine here if it helps: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/64303205 I find the 100-400mm more difficult to use than the 75-300mm and am still trying to get to grips with it. I'm sure it's ...

Looks like 2.3.6 is still available: https://community.topazlabs.com/c/releases

Yes (in my view). Multiple round trips from Lightroom and/or Photoshop is a nuisance.

Change request sent. Breath not held ....

Roll on the day all these are combined in one application!

I've now installed the update without issue. There are now 4 AI models to choose from. Can anyone please confirm that in the comparison view, you cannot change the top left view from Original? This ...

Although I am generally happy with Topaz Denoise, it's definitely not a one button solution. For a start there are now 4 different AI models to choose from and, in my experience, the auto setting ...

I can get better results with Topaz than I can with LR or PS. Could just be me though.

Topaz released Denoise 3.1 yesterday - closely followed by 3.1.1! Any early adopters out there? If so, how did it go please?

Or, probably, any other software.

Beautiful photos, thanks for sharing. I might have to rent a 300mm! :-)

Many thanks. I did wonder if the beaks were long enough for curlews.

Many thanks. And another please. Curlew?

Many thanks. Here's a slight improvement on the first photo: Also a chaffinch (?) although it lack detail - probably due to wrong settings!:

Many thanks for the speedy advice and kind comments. My first trip out of my home town for over a year!

Grateful help with the ID of these two small chaps taken at RSPB Minsmere recently. I am fairly certain that the first one is a stonechat but I'm not sure about the second - possibly a puffed up ...