dingenus

Yes, I think it is doable but not on paper. Do it on canvas with a clear visible structure. 150dpi will be enough.

That could be a good subject for the 29th Ig Nobelprice next year :-D

Did you resize the 420mm to the same pixel measurements as the cropped 300mm and than watch at 100%? Or  upsample the 300mm to the same pixel measurements as the 420mm? Both ways you will see the ...

Olympus has a team sensor developers. About 20 people AFAIK. They work on sensors for the medical side of this concern (very important) but also on photo sensors for their omd- em 1/2/........... ...

Your lens seems soft. But after a quick run in  photoshop with NIK sharpener and Efix filters the Orf looks nice. Nice shot!

You can't use the 70-300 without adapter. The original 4/3 to m4/3 is the best but also you can buy a cheap copy. The 14-54 is an much better lens than the 14-42. But if your copy is faulty you ...

Three flashes in umbrella, my old E3 some years ago. In an too small room. Did it for charity...

My exif reader said that the last one is not C1 but also DxO PhotoLab 1.2.1.

Nice idea to use that old 4/3 name again. I'm guessing it will not be more than 2.4Mp. And possibly one stop profit in iso and noise. But you never know.

I think the best you can do is waiting for the em1 mkIII. The sensor in this cam should be really better in noise and iso as the rumors say. Good luck.

in answer to BobT3218, Yes Olympus do use telecentricity, see
https://www.getolympus.com/us/en/advanced_technologies

I was 2 weeks in Israel and Egypt in 1990. I only had a Nikon slr with a Tokina 2.8/28-70mm with a small table tripod. I shot about 20 rolls of 100iso slide film. Only one roll of 1600iso for the ...

50-200 SWD.

Yes, take the 50-200 and the 12-100. That is 12-200 in two lenses with a big overlapping range. The 50-200 is very good at f4 and the 12-100 also. There is a difference in af speed but that's not ...

1/500, 1/400. No place is the same. Your shots showing the power of that falls. Very good!

Oops, beautiful bird, beautifully sharp and detailed pictures.

Hi, it seems different but hands down? Here a few old ones of me with the 45/1.8 on the old noisy epl1. Bokeh seems a little better on the sigma, softer, showing lower distortion.

'IQ-wise, 30mm wins hands down.' Do you have samples? Can you show us what the difference is?