lefkop

Lives in United States Los Angeles, United States
Works as a Physical Therapist
Joined on Dec 2, 2006

Comments

Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8
In reply to:

KEnrique: Don't understand why people keep on using Lightroom or Photoshop Raw to convert raw files... They are terrible!!! Try Capture One, or anyone of the good raw converters!

Totally agree

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2017 at 13:57 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 Review (1204 comments in total)
In reply to:

marcio_napoli: There surely must be a design difficulty, but the single most desirable feature this camera should have remains lacking: ISO 25 or below.

This is primarily a filmmaker's tool. Video on this thing is essentially shot at 1/50 shutter speed + large aperture, like all movies are shot.

Good luck with enough ND filters trying to keep your exposure correct in daylight ISO 100 (or 200), f1.4 to f2.8, and 1/50 SS.

ISO 25 would help immensely on that.

Also, m4/3 sensors are super noisy even at base ISO (GH4 owner here).

ISO 25 would clean up those shadows a lot, making filmmakers' life much easier on grading and chroma key shots.

Even better would be ISO 12.

I now own both the GH5 and the Olympus OMD EM1 M2 instead of the FS5. I did get the Vlog update to the GH5. The FS5 is a very practical camera, the electronic ND filter is flat out incredible. Its ergonomics and ease of use are fantastic, if you need autofocus its only fair. With regards to noise again, its best to use a camera at its base ISO. By moving the GH4 down to 200 ISO, its crushes the DR and it can create more noise because noise is really a result of how much light is falling or not on the sensor. More light gives you less noise no matter what the ISO setting is. Lights Camera Action - its not just a saying (LOL). I found this statement someplace on web site which holds true with regards to noise;
It is just as correct to say the lowest possible level of noise is achieved when as much light as possible is hitting the sensor (without overexposing the image) and the ISO is as high as possible (without overexposing the image).

Link | Posted on May 12, 2017 at 04:56 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 Review (1204 comments in total)
In reply to:

marcio_napoli: There surely must be a design difficulty, but the single most desirable feature this camera should have remains lacking: ISO 25 or below.

This is primarily a filmmaker's tool. Video on this thing is essentially shot at 1/50 shutter speed + large aperture, like all movies are shot.

Good luck with enough ND filters trying to keep your exposure correct in daylight ISO 100 (or 200), f1.4 to f2.8, and 1/50 SS.

ISO 25 would help immensely on that.

Also, m4/3 sensors are super noisy even at base ISO (GH4 owner here).

ISO 25 would clean up those shadows a lot, making filmmakers' life much easier on grading and chroma key shots.

Even better would be ISO 12.

Hi Marcio, so the FS5 is a great camera, its base ISO is 1000, you can push a couple of stops up I never shot 6400 with it (I used lit sets). I generally used it for HD 422 not the 4k 420, but the 420 is fine overall. Its a professional codec so you can throw it around in post somewhat. Its not noisy.
With regards to S log 3, there is a number of things to consider. First its really not iso 3200 as it says its, its the base ISO of 1000 but because the cure has been shifted it reads it as 3200, it is not, this is true on the A7S series too. You are recording less data in the highlights and there is an emphasis into the shadows subsequently you will see noise if shooting in lower light/less DR. Therefore S log is great to use outdoors or in bright high DR situations. Low light - dont use these profiles, the DR does not match the profile, your pulling noise out shadows because of the shift from 709 curve.

Link | Posted on May 12, 2017 at 04:43 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 Review (1204 comments in total)
In reply to:

marcio_napoli: There surely must be a design difficulty, but the single most desirable feature this camera should have remains lacking: ISO 25 or below.

This is primarily a filmmaker's tool. Video on this thing is essentially shot at 1/50 shutter speed + large aperture, like all movies are shot.

Good luck with enough ND filters trying to keep your exposure correct in daylight ISO 100 (or 200), f1.4 to f2.8, and 1/50 SS.

ISO 25 would help immensely on that.

Also, m4/3 sensors are super noisy even at base ISO (GH4 owner here).

ISO 25 would clean up those shadows a lot, making filmmakers' life much easier on grading and chroma key shots.

Even better would be ISO 12.

Hi folks, sorry i have not been on the forum for quite a while. With regards professional film making & the GH5, or other crop sensor consumer cameras. The differences in pro cameras vs consumer cameras are found in the codec's, DR, sensor tuning, Mb/s and color bit depth. Of course everything is about compromises and how much PITA factor you want to deal with. I was talking with one of my colorist buddies two nights ago about cameras and about his experiences with various consumer cameras. He and I do, very much like 4/3 for film making, I love them for photography too; I just bought the EM-1M2 (also have GX85 its amazing), I will probably grab GH5 in a day or so (since I just sold the FS5 two days ago). From a pragmatic approach when production has a decent budget, it will rent an Arri/Red/BM. Cine cams come and go quick and the cost is breathtaking,
Panasonic offers a very complete and capable video cameras that bridges the gap of consumer and entry level pro well.

Link | Posted on May 5, 2017 at 03:16 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 Review (1204 comments in total)
In reply to:

marcio_napoli: There surely must be a design difficulty, but the single most desirable feature this camera should have remains lacking: ISO 25 or below.

This is primarily a filmmaker's tool. Video on this thing is essentially shot at 1/50 shutter speed + large aperture, like all movies are shot.

Good luck with enough ND filters trying to keep your exposure correct in daylight ISO 100 (or 200), f1.4 to f2.8, and 1/50 SS.

ISO 25 would help immensely on that.

Also, m4/3 sensors are super noisy even at base ISO (GH4 owner here).

ISO 25 would clean up those shadows a lot, making filmmakers' life much easier on grading and chroma key shots.

Even better would be ISO 12.

I may be able to help some folks understand ISO on professional video cameras. On pro cameras we often don't change the iso from the native value,
which is often 800, (unless we absolutely have too). Just for the record too, Panasonic has a vari cam with two native ISO's (one for lower light use). I use an FS5, with native ISO of 1000. Its important to work at native ISO (or in and around it) because it is where the sensor performs optimally. The Gh5 has many pro feature, if they included method of behind the lens ND, they would completely own the day for filmmakers. Lowering the ISO's does not improve the sensor performance on a video camera and probably not on a stills camera either, your gaining down actually degrades the DR. Have a look here

http://www.xdcam-user.com/2013/12/why-gain-is-bad-for-your-dynamic-range/http://www.xdcam-user.com/2015/12/video-camera-noise-iso-and-sensitivity/

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2017 at 03:04 UTC

I am an owner of the C100 dual pixel autofocus, its a very nice camera and has no problem making great video. NO FREAKIN way would I buy this camera over the Sony, These are crazy expensive. There are a lot of other cameras out there which can produce amazing results at a fraction of the is price.

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2015 at 18:11 UTC as 16th comment
In reply to:

jkoch2: Obviously the richest hybrid combination on the market. More all-in-one than any other model. A "killer" product, but perhaps not in the way its maker would like.

$1,700 is a very bold price. Add $300 for a lens, and the price simply equals what Sony wants for the FDR-AX1, which has fewer features. The pricing will daunt competitors from offering competiting 4k video features. It may result in more orders than Panasonic can supply for months, yet be too low for Panasonic to make money.

Meanwhile, the prices of 4k displays fall, and the buyers' set-up problems, product returns, and scarcity of 4k content make profits anything but certain. The notion of "future proofing" collides very roundly with the consumer urge to share instantly. The only 4k video that is quickly shareable online may turn out to be the stuff shot with $300 phones.

Hence, a many-pronged gamble. Why would Canon or Nikon be eager to join the perilous game?

The BM systems are a very different beast than the GH4. With Blackmagic you are essentially buying the sensor and a box. I have worked with cinematographers, and they are not huge fans of the system - they are finicky . Moreover very few industry film and tv want BM of gear on set despite its high quality output mostly because they are a PITA. They much prefer RED's or arri alexa's. For a budget film maker and enthusiast they are excellent cameras made to be tripod mounted (including the pocket cam due to its need for additional cage, amplified mikes, battery backs etc.. It not just about the box and lens, these are whole system considerations that involved. The GH4 offers a lot of bang for the buck - no argument there. By the time you add up all the pieces you need to add on to even the BMPCC - your basically wher GH4 plus a lens would be. Choose your tool, and enjoy

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 07:44 UTC

more gagets on board not sure I am so into that. Hope they fix the overheating issue on this model when using video. Lets hope for a better Jpeg engine too.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 16:02 UTC as 15th comment
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8