Fredrik Glckner

I have compared some tele zoom lenses here, and find that the 45-175mm tends to be the very best: http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2015/10/lumix-tele-lenses-compared.html So I would recommend the ...

I have compared them here: http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2014/04/lumix-g-12-32mm-f35-56-review-small-and.html And here: http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2014/03/comparison-12mm.html I think the 12-35mm ...

You have very different lenses on your list there. There is a huge span from 17mm to 25mm. What is it you want? * Compactness: If so, look at the Lumix G 20mm f/1.7, or Lumix G 14mm f/2.5. Out of ...

But both are very good at 12mm, and certainly good enough for most conceivable uses ... As you can see from the link, though, the 12-32mm is generally somewhat better in the corners wide open.

You can see a comparison here: http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2016/12/lumix-g-12-60mm-review.html In my opinion, the 12-32mm is the better lens, it is truly amazing.

Here is a head to head test of the two cameras using the same lens (Sigma 30mm f/2.8): https://youtu.be/O5qSbRCZGHs I wouldn't say that EM5 II is better in terms of video AF. If you set the G85 to ...

I have both, and I would take the G85 any day. The E-M5 II is perhaps slightly better at stabilizing prime (non-OIS) lenses, but the difference is quite small: http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2016/11/ ...

I had to mouseover the image to understand that you talked about the Lumix X 35-100mm f/2.8, as opposed to the smaller 35-100mm variant. This comment might help those who don't mouseover ...

Not exactly what you are looking for, but I find that the Mk II version of the lens is much better at keeping the right focus with the Lumix GH5 compared with the Mk I version: http://m43photo.blog ...

The Lumix G 14mm f/2.5 is a quite old lens by now, and in my experience, it doesn't handle high contrast very well. That makes it less than optimal for nightscapes, given that you have some strong ...

This depends on how you used your Nikon tele setup. If you do challenging stuff like Birds in Flight, don't expect the same success rate. I have basically the same Nikon setup myself, and BiF is ...

I have used all GH models, from GH1 through GH5, and have never noticed any annoying delay before being able to record movies. But wait: Why do you press the red movie button? I find that it is ...

The 45-200mm lens was interesting when it was first announced: The longest M4/3 lens. However, today, it is wastly outdated: * Too large and heavy * Extending front section wobbles (this may have ...

I have compared the Mk I and Mk II of Lumix G 100-300mm lenses. The newer AF means the new lens is much better when it comes to AF-C use. It means more keeper images, see the comparison here: http: ...

I have the Mk I versions of the lenses, and have the same experience as you. The Lumix X 12-35mm f/2.8 is just fantastic, with the performance dropping a bit towards the longer end: http://m43photo ...

Based on what I've read, it seems like these two lenses are rated about the same in terms of optical quality. If you are looking to buy one of them for use on the Lumix G85, I would choose the ...

In my opinion, the Lumix G 12-60mm f/3.5-5.6 is a fine kit zoom lens. I use it on the GH5 all the time. I can see that having a larger aperture lens is a good thing, but why is it better to have a ...

You could choose the same process that I do when capturing 3D video. The remote trigger used in this article works well also with the GH5. (I use it on a pair of GX7's in the article below, but ...

Newer cameras are able to use the Lumix G 20mm focus in a good way. The focus speed is not likely to be a problem in any real world situations. Except if you are focusing while recording 4K video, ...

Sounds like a good use of the lens! The weather protection makes it better to bring along when hiking. I also like the compressed perspective you get from a tele lens. For landscapes, this can be ...