Fredrik Glckner

I agree. The GH5 is a truly fantastic camera. Autofocus is the only issue. When the camera was launched, it ticked three of the four boxes it could: (1) 10 bit recording (2) 4K @ 60p (3) IBIS (x) ...

As much as I think the Lumix X 12-35mm f/2.8 is a fantastic lens, one of the absolute best for M4/3, I would much rather have the 12-60mm lens on a trip as my only lens. The extra reach in the long ...

The J5 has (had) a sensor readout speed of approx 1/80s. So this is slow enough that you can provoke some rolling shutter effects by panning quickly. But for most use, it is good enough. M4/3 ...

I have used some Sony E lenses on the Techart adapter, but it is a bit hit and miss if they work: Sigma 19mm f/2.8 (work well for me, but some vignetting) Sigma 30mm f/1.4 (worked well in the ...

And the lens was ultra rare and extremely expensive. And gigantic. For M4/3, you can get the Laowa 4mm f/2.8, which does the same, albeit at 210 degrees, for USD 200. And it is tiny, with a good ...

Crop factor is irrelevant for a fisheye lens, as long as the fisheye lens projects the image inside the sensor size. There are some fisheye lenses designed for the M4/3 format, which do this. So ...

You can use any tubes that have electronic contacts. See my article here for a description: http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2013/07/meike-macro-rings-highly-recommended.html Scroll down about 25% to ...

Hello SonyX. The GH4 starting price was USD 1700. Consumers probably didn't see any reason why the predecessor GH5 should cost more as well. But the producer sees a reason why the price should go ...

If the GH6 comes with 8K video capture, a first for consumer grade interchangeable lens cameras, there is no way it will cost as little as USD 2000. I would say at least USD 3000. The GH5 had a big ...

The first one was the Lumix G 14-140mm f/4-5.8 (old version). This was when I bought the GH1 in 2009. If it wasn't a kit, I would never have bought the lens at all, since I didn't believe much in ...

It is a bit hit and miss if this adapter works or not. Here are my experiences, and I know that other people have other experiences: Sigma 19mm f/2.8: Works well on Z7 Sigma 30mm f/1.4: Worked in ...

Canon TX1 had an interesting body, which I think had some promise. I don't know if the ergonomics were well worked out, probably not, but the idea of having a hand grip and an articulated screen is...

In my experience, the Samyang 35mm f/2.8 works fine on the Techart adapter and Nikon Z 7. Perhaps there are different firmware versions of the lenses. But mine works totally fine.

There is a tiny bit of vignetting (dark corners) even in 5:4 mode on the Nikon Z 7: Here is in full 3:2 mode:

I'm using the Sigma 19mm lens on the Nikon Z7. I can try to find an image later.

I have tried the Sigma 19mm f/2.8 and Sigma 30mm f/1.4 (both are for APS-C, but don't vignette a lot on fullframe, some cropping is needed). The 19mm lens works fine. The 30mm f/1.4 lens worked in ...

I think this is because the Z6 (like many mirrorless cameras) can choose to use a moderate aperture for live view (when you are composing the shot), while changing the aperture to the right one ...

You could use the Techart adapter, and the Samyang 35mm f/2.8 or 24mm f/2.8 lenses with Sony E mounts. That works quite well, and the lenses are tiny.

What is the basis for saying that it is the same sensor? That both share the same number of megapixels? There are many components that make up the imaging system, e.g., * readout circuit * filter stack

I have compared the lenses head on here: http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2015/10/lumix-tele-lenses-compared.html (scroll down about 40% to see the comparison) In genereal, I think that the 45-175mm ...