halfwaythere

I don't see that. I don't think you can call lenses that produce a "F/2.4 look" exceptional.  By this metric every cheapo 85/1.8 is outstanding because at F/2.4 most of them are stellar. You can't ...

To a point. Canon and Nikon's pedigree and professional expertise guarantees, to a degree, that they're top of the line lenses are they're best efforts. I'm not saying they don't rip you off but at ...

I think it's safe to say adding a "PRO" or a "Nocticron" to a lenses' name is nothing more than a marketing ploy. There's also nothing outstanding optically that warrants the price. The Sigma ...

It's more like a 77D: no 1/8000, no headphone jack, worse sync speed, worse video specs compared to an 80D. And you are paying a hefty premium for full frame sensor worse than the original 6D and ...

Let the drooling begin.

I guess it's a decent vlogging camera if you're into that.

*Kills it if you don't rack the zoom or shoot anything backlit.

It's funny how badly some folks take criticism.

And to answer some questions not every wedding photog has a studio and given the average 20 to 30 weddings a year for a seasoned pro, 6000$ for a...

There are folks shooting wedding for 500$ that are more talented but unfortunately don't live in a "1st world" country.

Envy has nothing to do with it.

Good for her that charging 6000$ for mediocrity isn't a crime.

It's not a video camera. You should know this prior to the purchase.

Canon has a very good Cinema line of products that offer much better video everything.

Magic Lantern will give you 4k and 120p. But probably with a massive crop and bad quality.

Totally unnecessary quotation marks for after sale services and lenses which are objective features. The color rendering is subjective to a point.

Going by the increased native high ISO over the 5D4, I'm expecting the high ISO performance to be on par with the 1DX2. The improved low ISO dynamic range and processing latitude is another bonus.