halfwaythere

It's funny how badly some folks take criticism.

And to answer some questions not every wedding photog has a studio and given the average 20 to 30 weddings a year for a seasoned pro, 6000$ for a...

There are folks shooting wedding for 500$ that are more talented but unfortunately don't live in a "1st world" country.

Envy has nothing to do with it.

Good for her that charging 6000$ for mediocrity isn't a crime.

It's not a video camera. You should know this prior to the purchase.

Canon has a very good Cinema line of products that offer much better video everything.

Magic Lantern will give you 4k and 120p. But probably with a massive crop and bad quality.

Totally unnecessary quotation marks for after sale services and lenses which are objective features. The color rendering is subjective to a point.

Going by the increased native high ISO over the 5D4, I'm expecting the high ISO performance to be on par with the 1DX2. The improved low ISO dynamic range and processing latitude is another bonus.

It's sad how fanboys resort to name calling when the format they are desperately supporting simply can't compete.

If your chosen format struggles to offer shallow DOF bellow 50mm equiv. the next...

dxomark is close to irrelevant for just about anything. Rating the EM1-2 almost the same as the D500 for ISO is a blatant lie.

IBIS applies to non-moving subjects.

Perplexed? Really?

From an image quality standpoint m43 is a the bottom of the ILC market, since Nikon 1 and Pentax Q tanked. How can a skilled photographer get worse results with superior...

Is it just me or this camera looks like a blueprint for an upcoming D650.

My guess is they are keeping the D500 body for a future D760.

Gotta love the fanboys acting like 2000$ for a F/2.8 prime is anything but ridiculous.

Fuji is simply trying to exploit a niche: "affordable" medium format. One of the compromises is sensor size, compared to classic medium format, with the other being lenses, expensive and not very...

The most "meh" results in recent memory.

They coexist with one major difference: lens pricing and diversity.

You don't even gain a full stop over 135. In other words someone transitioning from APS-C to 135 is going to notice a bigger improvement than some moving from 135 to this "MF".

Calling Medium Format a "slightly bigger than 135 format" has already changed what digital Medium Format is.

The Sony is the softest of them...

From Sigma's site:

This state-of-the-art prime lens touts a dust and splash proof construction for guaranteed performance in any condition

Maybe you could write them an email and call them liars...

I've tested both the Tamron and the Tokina and I've chosen the Tamron because it was actually sharper, focuses faster and is consistently more accurate and the VC is a nice bonus. Seems like Tamron...