Nuno Souto

Nuno Souto

Lives in Australia Sydney, Australia
Works as a IT damager
Joined on Jul 11, 2007
About me:

Nikon D80 and D200, Oly EM-5 and MII, all in RAW, with Corel Aftershot Pro 2 for processing and Paintshop Pro X9 for post.

Lots of F-series 35mm Nikon bodies, a Zeiss rangefinder, a few Leica and Voigtlander lenses and some Oly and Sigma Art MFT ones.
SLR lenses mostly Nikkor - MF and AF/AFS, some Tamron and Sigma.
Mamiya RB67 and 645 Pro-TL and Fuji 645S rangefinder.
Scanner is a beaut 9000 ED and a brand new plustek Opticfilm 120.
I use Neat Image, Irfanview, Focus Magic and Picture Window Pro for image processing

Comments

Total: 153, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article GIMP seeks funding for future advanced features (239 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nuno Souto: More than 10 years ago I dearly asked Gimp devs to implement 16 and 32 bit colour support. Without that it is useless to photographers. Only to be told that was not a priority for them. So I moved on (no, not to Adobe s/w). Now they finally woke up? Wonders will never cease. I wish they get sufficient support to continue, but it won't be from me!

You get banding with 8 bit per channel if you are using it for photography. Like it or not. But please feel free to keep on using that for your photography editing. I simply will not.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2017 at 14:26 UTC
On article GIMP seeks funding for future advanced features (239 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nuno Souto: More than 10 years ago I dearly asked Gimp devs to implement 16 and 32 bit colour support. Without that it is useless to photographers. Only to be told that was not a priority for them. So I moved on (no, not to Adobe s/w). Now they finally woke up? Wonders will never cease. I wish they get sufficient support to continue, but it won't be from me!

Amazingly enough for all the idiots commenting without a clue as to what I did, I actually financially supported Gimp and used it since almost the start.
And just a little catch-up with reality: I don't feel ANY motivation for supporting a project that took 17 years to, wait for it, STILL NOT be finished.
In anyone's book, that is not acceptable.
And no, 8-bit colour is NOT acceptable for ANY type of photography editing.
But feel free to continue to edit your jpgs, there's a good crowd.
And yell "kewl" and other similar nonsense as you gain banding...

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2017 at 14:14 UTC
On article GIMP seeks funding for future advanced features (239 comments in total)

More than 10 years ago I dearly asked Gimp devs to implement 16 and 32 bit colour support. Without that it is useless to photographers. Only to be told that was not a priority for them. So I moved on (no, not to Adobe s/w). Now they finally woke up? Wonders will never cease. I wish they get sufficient support to continue, but it won't be from me!

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2017 at 12:28 UTC as 19th comment | 7 replies

The final nail in the coffin of digital!
:)))

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2017 at 04:43 UTC as 8th comment

Are they also looking into firing the entire accounting and management layers responsible for stopping it a few years ago?
No?
Pass...

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 07:56 UTC as 63rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Nuno Souto: Might work if they also reduced the silly prices they're charging for E6 chemicals.
In the last 3 years most commercial development places gave up on E6 or raised the prices for development to levels never seen before. I'm talking 500% increase in prices.
Caused by Kodak's and Fuji's price rises for the chemicals.
Add to that the price of E6 film nowadays and the availability only at end of 2017 and it's a losing proposition from the word "go"...

Never tried cafenol, but I've read good things about it.
I use Agfa's Rodinal on stand development (1:200, long time, no agitation).
Lasts forever at that rate of use and the result is very easily scanned - at least with my scanners. Not replacing digital by any means but I enjoy playing with it.
The other one I'm quite partial to is Ilford XP2 Plus. Very convenient as it is developed in C41 and shops that do it are easy to find. It also scans fantastic and I can use infra-red dust cleaning, which is impossible with other B&W films.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 10:42 UTC
In reply to:

Nuno Souto: Might work if they also reduced the silly prices they're charging for E6 chemicals.
In the last 3 years most commercial development places gave up on E6 or raised the prices for development to levels never seen before. I'm talking 500% increase in prices.
Caused by Kodak's and Fuji's price rises for the chemicals.
Add to that the price of E6 film nowadays and the availability only at end of 2017 and it's a losing proposition from the word "go"...

Thanks, but for B&W I stick to Acros and Rodinal. Works a treat and is heaps cheaper.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 09:03 UTC

Might work if they also reduced the silly prices they're charging for E6 chemicals.
In the last 3 years most commercial development places gave up on E6 or raised the prices for development to levels never seen before. I'm talking 500% increase in prices.
Caused by Kodak's and Fuji's price rises for the chemicals.
Add to that the price of E6 film nowadays and the availability only at end of 2017 and it's a losing proposition from the word "go"...

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2017 at 01:32 UTC as 86th comment | 4 replies
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1381 comments in total)

This is now priced in Australia at well over $2700. While the EM5MII is hardly over $1000. And a Nikon D810 is slightly over $2800 while a Sony A7RII is $3800.
Someone at Olympus is on fumes if they think this is sustainable...
Sorry, no "pro" pricing excuses!

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2016 at 03:18 UTC as 54th comment | 3 replies
On article New 20mm F2 4.5x macro lens released by Mitakon (122 comments in total)

Almost fixed focus distance (20cm) , hardly any focus range.
Can already hear the dangerous insects having a go at the photographers using this!
When will some sort of user nous percolate into these "weird lens" makers?
Sorry. Pass...

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 10:26 UTC as 15th comment | 5 replies

Kirk Tuck

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2016 at 14:02 UTC as 94th comment
In reply to:

Nuno Souto: Buh-bye, DSLR-only "pros"! :)
The writing has been on the wall for 5 years now.
You didn't listen? Well then: watch the "value" of your "pro" dslr drop through the bottom.
About high time Sony and Oly got some proper competition.
What was that squeaky noise over there?
Ah yes, Nikon...
Bye! :)

Very true. My bad.
The only problem is the average consumer doesn't give a fig about image quality. What they want is to take a shot, swing the little screen at their friends and go: "There! See, I'm a (pro) photographer". Same as the old Instamatic crowd. And they are in their full right to do it, I'm afraid... :(

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 10:25 UTC
In reply to:

Nuno Souto: Buh-bye, DSLR-only "pros"! :)
The writing has been on the wall for 5 years now.
You didn't listen? Well then: watch the "value" of your "pro" dslr drop through the bottom.
About high time Sony and Oly got some proper competition.
What was that squeaky noise over there?
Ah yes, Nikon...
Bye! :)

Amazing. Always the same crowd, with the same motivation and reactions. Could just transplant them to Usenet and they'd fit right in.
Stay monkies, you lot. It's the only thing you can do with your precious "pro" gear. Rest of the world will be using smartphone and mirrorless cameras in 5 years. Enjoy pre-history.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 21:46 UTC
In reply to:

Nuno Souto: Buh-bye, DSLR-only "pros"! :)
The writing has been on the wall for 5 years now.
You didn't listen? Well then: watch the "value" of your "pro" dslr drop through the bottom.
About high time Sony and Oly got some proper competition.
What was that squeaky noise over there?
Ah yes, Nikon...
Bye! :)

BWAHAHA! As expected, the "I'm a pro because I use the same gear pros use" crowd went mental. 😁
None of them has ever seen one of their photos at full rez. Always at the "amazing" rez of their monitors: 1920X1200 at best.
It's gonna be fun to watch their make believe world of photo "expertise" crumble.
And yes: the quotes mean sarcasm. 😎

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 13:26 UTC

Buh-bye, DSLR-only "pros"! :)
The writing has been on the wall for 5 years now.
You didn't listen? Well then: watch the "value" of your "pro" dslr drop through the bottom.
About high time Sony and Oly got some proper competition.
What was that squeaky noise over there?
Ah yes, Nikon...
Bye! :)

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 08:52 UTC as 62nd comment | 16 replies

Gave up on Adobe stuff more than a decade ago.
Spent some time with GIMP, but unfortunately the development team is totally absent-minded on the necessity of supporting more than 8-bit colour.
Been using Aftershot Pro and Picture Window Pro for quite a while now and quite frankly, it's all I'll ever need.
I do photography, not graphic arts.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2016 at 13:12 UTC as 22nd comment

And after so many years, GIMP still does NOT support 16-bit colour depth in any tiff image! Unbelievable!

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2016 at 12:09 UTC as 140th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

thubten: Excellent article. The pros are encouraging,but the cons say "wait till next year" for me

GaryJP: it will be repeated as many times as I feel like and there is NOTHING you and the cohorts of dslr corporate shills can do to stop it.
Ain't it exasperating?
:)

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2016 at 05:59 UTC

When will the "dslr-only" folks wake up and understand the days of lugging around 15 pounds of equipment to take one photo or make a little video are over and done?

And no, you are NOT a "pro" because you use the same gear as some internet blogger!

Grow up, go outside and smell the flowers, it's really worth it.
Mirrorless is here to stay and is the future.

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2016 at 00:51 UTC as 37th comment | 16 replies
In reply to:

Zvonimir Tosic: Why is the talk about photography deliberately dumbed down to a current technology? The future of cooking is "probably the microwave"; now who wants to say that? For what we have seen in the last 150 years is that photography is immune to tech fad and it develops as it goes; nothing is worse than nail it down to the empty talk of advocates of a certain tech.

That goes for any technology, isn't it?
Long live film!
:)

Link | Posted on Jun 28, 2016 at 05:12 UTC
Total: 153, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »