csintexas

Yes, it could be that I have not put in enough effort with CaptureOne and RAW to see the advantage.

Each photo needs to be handled separately anyway so it is not possible to fully batch process them. But outputting to jpeg essentially batch processes them in camera for standard contrast, ...

thanks, These are post processed jpegs. I think that most of these where shot with Vivid +1+2+3 I generally shoot under exposed (keeps the sky deep blue) and then bring up the dark's in post. ...

thanks, That would be a lot of fun to be able to spend several months there.  If I could just live in a camper and travel around to all the great parks I would be happy.

You bought the wrong system, sell it and get the Fuji for their lenses. If you do not want the $2000 x-t2 you can get the x-t20 for about $1000 with the kit lens you want. -or even the x-a3 if you ...

I have C1 and also Coral's Paintshop pro but I generally only use ACDsee ultimate because I do not find any difference in finished quality and ACDsee started out as an image database so it's file ...

Thanks all for the kind words. Just finished getting a Flickr album made: https://www.flickr.com/photos/cspics/albums/72157682205409351

Great shot -do you remember where?

I really like the quality of the Rokinon10 and I like the dramatic width but I found that the 16-50 was much more useful and convenient. Would be nice to replace it with something better like the ...

Just got back from a week long trip to these parks. All hand held. Rokinon 10mm Schwabacher's Landing (morning) is one of the more idealistic views that I found and also has a busy beaver family ...

I do not see how making a system heavier is going to appeal to most people who use really large lenses. When using them you hold on to (or mount) the lens not the camera so all a larger camera ...

Might be good, Sony gets knocked a lot by crop enthusiasts for their handling. Although I personally do not see any need to spend more money than I did on the a6000. The cost seems to escalate out ...

Ah I see, yeah you are right. Any extra money or material spent to create a full frame view is wasted on a crop body. Although I could not say with any confidence that if this had been a crop GM ...

Aren't all lens focal lengths given in terms of FF? Why would you apply the crop factor to it and not the Sony? the Sigma 18-35 and the Sony 16-35 are the most comparable options. How is wideness ...

Is the camera malfunctioning under any conceivably realistic scenario or are you actually planning o shooting the wedding in the dark at ISO3200? The a6000 is not an infrared night vision camera.

I guess it is possible to get some sort of contamination in the lens or sensor or some age related issue, but I do not know how likely that would be assuming that the equipment has been handled ...

So I am assuming the suspect is now the lens and not the body. I do see that your 16-70 image is not as sharp but according to DxO it should be slightly sharper. (unless I am mistaken) Some of this ...

What I am suggesting is that to really see if it is different I would need to see a side by side test because just your example image alone is not outside of normal variation in my opinion. The ...

I agree, the Rok/Sam 12 is a nice lens but not great for general purpose. A used Sigma19 could be found for a pretty reasonable price and I think provide an all around more useful lens. My personal ...

Hard to say. Really without showing the results with the same lens and settings on the two different bodies (along with EXIF data) it is impossible to determine. Neither of these pictures are out ...