Peter in Canberra

I sold my 7200 when I bought my D7500. I like them both. The sports shooting aspect of the D7500 is very nice. I'm now thinking of trying to get a D7200 as part of my 'DX F mount nuclear winter' ...

but the OP just might like it. I know I like mine.

thanks. I think a second D7500 or D7200 would be in front in terms of another camera body (given the death of the DX body line I am thinking about a 'backup' body) Though by the time the D7500 ...

super shot.

thank you.

one thing I did wonder is whether the little bit of extra weight made for a little more stability handheld (like heavy barrels in target rifles) - I have a sense that I get a little movement when ...

you had me excited til I read the last sentence :-)

oh, I'm sorry to have suggested they were departed. even more neat photos !

just came back to this and had a look at the 50-100 - I wasn't really aware of it. From Thom Hogan's review it looks like (unlike other f1.8 lenses*) it might actually be fast enough in AF terms ...

the usual story for us here in the antipodes :-(

taxidermists as well as photographers?

another Q of academic curiosity. I have the little AF-P 70-300 DX VR lens and it is very good - using on DX obviously - D7500 and D3300. Anyone used both lenses on DX bodies? Thoughts? Advantages ...

:-)

thanks for this - very helpful. good marks for the Tamron :-)

thanks, I know the hood from the 18-200 also fits. it was really just an observation. though if the 16-80 is billed as 'an ultimate' walk around lens then having such a big hood makes it a PITA to ...

thanks Michael yes, I was trying to reduce lens changes. 35-150 achieves that mostly. it is going wider that I find I need most. As I'm often trying to get some depth of field - to capture details ...

thanks bluzman. so it's pretty even in terms of performance characteristics. I often can get away with just 35-150 it seems but a little wider might be more useful than a little longer,. I should ...

Anybody used both of these lenses? Nikon AF-S 24-120 f4 VR and Tamron 35-150 f2.8-4 VC? I have used the Tamron and it is nice enough and sharp. It is released more recently and a bit chunkier. The ...

Anybody used both of these lenses? Nikon AF-S 24-120 f4 VR and Tamron 35-150 f2.8-4 VC? I have used the Tamron and it is nice enough and sharp. It is released more recently and a bit chunkier. The ...

thanks. the tip about bursts is helpful. 100-400 is another option too for me.