Vertumnus

These lenses are not in the same league.GM2 24-70/2.8 is a professional,state of the art standard zoom with excellent sharpness,microcontrast and colour rendition throughout the range.G 20-70/4 is ...

In the real life shooting one will not notice striking difference between Tamron 70-180/2.8 and Sony G 70-300,between 70 and 180mm. It seems like you have somehow faulty copy of the G70-300.Good ...

55/1.7 is sharper wide open and has less CA compared to 80/1.7.Also 55/110/250 is better than 80/110/250,thoug more versatile combo will be 55/120 macro/250.

Tamron 70-300 is OK fromm 100mm to 300mm.Close up performance is poor.Sigma 100-400 is much better in every respect,save size,weight and price.

Sony G 70-200/4 Mk2 is a very good for landscape.GM 70-200/2.8 Mk2 is excellent - slightly sharper and contrastier.I have both  and can recommend both,depending on circumstance.

Batis 25 is a better choice if you care about Zeiss IQ (unique colour rendition+microcontrast).Sigma 24 offers manual aperture ring and comparable sharpness.

Batis 135/2.8 is a class for itself and no other Sony and Sigma may match it's unique character.The character of super Zeissy,apochromatic short tele. I used it with various Sony A7 series (but no ...

Sony 90/2.8 Macro is an excellent,flexible lens for both macro and general use.In general use it has only one shortcoming,same as other macros used as short teles - if you focus manually the focus ...

Try Sigma 17/4 DG DN Contemporary.It is worth a sin.Tiny,solid,manual apertutre ring,sharp,very good colours and not expensive.

Sigma 17/4 does very well on my A7CR as well as both of mine A7R4A with similar,60 MPX sensor.It is a very good lens.Compact and lightweeihgt but solid.Sharp,nice color rendition.Distortion easily ...

If you can afford GM 16-35/2.8 to use it as uwa zoom,the choice is simple.Between professional,high quality zoom with very good/excellent overall performance and plasticky,amateur medium overall ...

Sony GM 70-200/2.8 Mk2 is so much better in every respect compared to Mk1 that I would upgrade the lens first.Sony A7R3 is a very good camera with excellent sensor.Compact and outstanding GM Mk2 ...

You can get Sigma 16-28/2.8+Sigma 28-70/2.8+Sigma 100-400/5-6.3.This is a very versatile,good IQ,wide and fast where needed outfit ,covering anything from 16mm to 400mm and alows for some decent ...

Hi, Why I spent 35k GBP on Fuji GFX stuff alone last two years though I don't print? The answer is simple - to feel satisfaction every time I look at a well PPied 100mp picture. This satisfaction ...

GF 80 complement nicely GF110,Don't forget to add GF55 (it has less CA than GF80 I can tell you :) )

I got both Sony 100-400 and Sigma 100-400 (Son y 200-600 too).IQ-wise Sony 100-400 is marginally better (sharper,contrastier,more vivid colour rendition-it is to be seen especially between ...

Not A7R5,but A7R2 with 42 mpx FF sensor was the last one when I have used Canon EF L fast zooms through Sigma MC-11 adapter.Informations below are basing on that. You will see significant ...

If I were you I would start with 20-35/4+45-100/4+100-200/5.6.They are all very good and cover wide range of focal lengths.Then I would add 55/1.7+110/2+120/4 Macro to have finest fast prime+short ...

It is native,fully compatible lens in FE mount.It does not need adapters.

Sigma 105/2.8 Macro Art DG DN is a very sharp lens.Wide open it isa tad sharper than Sony 90/2.8 macro OSS,yet difference is not field relevant.However autofocus is a bit noisy and slower compared ...