Joined on Nov 12, 2011


Total: 57, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

WillWeaverRVA: "You can't go beyond the zone's boundaries, can't crash your drone into another drone, and can't stray outside of minimum and maximum altitudes – autopilot will kick in and prevent you from doing any of these things."

Aw, that's no fun! ;)

My thoughts exactly. Otherwise how would we get to fly one of them around in the lion's den at the zoo?

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 12:26 UTC
In reply to:

xiao fei: Regardless of how obnoxious you think the drone is, the appropriate course of action is to record it and or just go inside and call the police instead of shooting firearms into the air. If your rights are being infringed, there is a legal system for that.

Take a pic and call the cops?

In some areas crime, wrecks, etc are so prevalent the cops can't even get to the scene because they are overloaded.

They're so busy they aren't able to investigate someone selling dope to kids, ho's working the street, and who knows what else.

And they will come to investigate every time someone takes a pic of a pesky drone? In what century do you expect them to arrive?

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 11:59 UTC

Pesky drone.


It's raining toothpicks.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 11:48 UTC as 4th comment
On article Leica SL Review (1089 comments in total)

The cheapskate is surfacing in me, but $7450 for a camera - and the body only at that? Ouch.
For that kind of money, I could be driving something.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2017 at 12:27 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ELLIOTPAULSTERN: I am sorry. What am I missing here. I do not see any images at all except a terrible blur. Mesmerizing????? More like a waste of time. :(

No, no, no. You're just not reading fast enough using your magnifying glass.

What I found interesting is how the percentage of space devoted to photographs steadily increased over time, and that if you click on the screen it will stop and you can (sort of) see the photos on individual pages.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 12:46 UTC
In reply to:

spikey27: Hanging is too good for the clowns and their flying contraptions operating near people or structures.

ASINMT: How many times has your stunt kite flown into a bystander and injured them?

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 13:17 UTC
In reply to:

Rick Knepper: You use your smart phone to trigger your DSLR. Now, people are buying triggers for the trigger?

Kindof what I thought - why do you need a trigger to trigger a trigger?

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 13:15 UTC
In reply to:

TempusFugit2012: Unlike the old RC community UAS operators have very little "skin in the game". It used to be that you would spend time building your RC craft and then because of the time spent, you would certainly be exceptionally careful with the operations. However today the price of entry is simply a Visa/Amex and the B&H URL. Operators much approach UAS flight as professional pilots do: Plan the flight, prepare with contingency plans, and minimize risk to people on the ground.

There are no fail safe systems in the UAS (nor will there ever be) that provide better protection than an informed operator.

Mike and Tempus: Thanks for sharing. If regulations (not so dirty a word after all) require that everyone who flies a drone has to take meaningful training, I think there would be more respect for them as they wouldn't be so demanding that they could fly an infernal contraption in off-limits places.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 13:21 UTC

Hanging is too good for the clowns and their flying contraptions operating near people or structures.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 13:15 UTC as 5th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

danny006: Amazing !! So many years ago when there were no cars in the streets.

Watch where you step.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 13:03 UTC
In reply to:

mokara: I don't think you need a model release in situations were someone is incidentally in a larger picture. This photograph as shown in reports appears to be part of a much larger image, as judged by the lack of detail and grain in the image.

Also, the person in the image is not identifiable. This woman will have to prove that she is the person in the image, and that will be really hard given that it is essentially a vague shape of a face. She also claims that the hair was "digitally altered", meaning that she did not actually look like that at the time. She claims that she was approached by someone looking like the photographer.....who the hell remembers the appearance of someone they incidentally encountered 8 years ago? This claim does not have a whole lot of credibility.

What about a photo of a crowded street scene anywhere in the world? Does the photographer have to get a release from each of the hundreds of people shown?

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 14:27 UTC
In reply to:

Edgar_in_Indy: Anybody have a link to the photo?

If that is the photo, give her a prepaid Chipotle gift card and call it even.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 14:24 UTC
In reply to:

vscd: Don't forget to bring back the developing machines, too. Especially in europe. It would be a shame that I know it's available again but I can't develop it in the EU. Great news, anyway.

The same goes for elsewhere. If I recall correctly, the equipment for processing Kodachrome is quite a bit more elaborate than for other films.

And Kodachrome retains the throne as having the most faithful reproduction of colors ever made in such a product - despite its "slow" speed of ASA 25.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 13:31 UTC
In reply to:

Peiasdf: It is just some glitch with the SONY camera module. By design it shouldn't over heat and from experience, it won't. I recorded 50 minutes straight of my father making dinner last week and no overheating issue. That's 4K with OIS in a warm kitchen and my hand(s) holding the phone.

Peiasdf: Are we to conclude that you have the only one that works properly?

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 12:51 UTC
In reply to:

wetsleet: All phones get warm. But no screen, that takes courage. Of course Apple will claim they were the first with this, but we photographers know that Leica beat them to it!

Hey, maybe super-patent-troll Apple will figure out how to get this patented. That would prevent anyone else from using it, and if they were unfortunate enough for this to happen on their product, Apple could sue their pants off, Huge win-win for Apple.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 12:38 UTC
On article Pulse: Extreme weather in black and white (56 comments in total)

Nature is fantastic - ranging from sheer beauty to its incredible destructive ability.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 12:21 UTC as 10th comment

Why does Yahoo wait 2-3 years to inform their customers of these problems?

Could it be because they run out of excuses to hide them at the corporate board meetings?

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 12:13 UTC as 2nd comment

+This is scary.

Technology can be wonderful if used for the right purposes, and it can be awful otherwise.

A friend told me about while in Richmond VA several years ago, using standard issue +radar equipment at the time radar cops timed "something" at over 130 mph on a residential street. They never saw anything, but they were sure it was not caused by aircraft.

I can imagine these being used by unscrupulous police departments for speed monitoring, and if anything goes wrong - i.e. something like the above happens - they will still pin a charge on innocent, unsuspecting drivers.

Then they will have to spend their own money to defend themselves in court, without recourse to recover their legal fees. You do know that is the law in most jurisdictions nowdays, don't you?

Or maybe your insurer gets their hands on the data and jacks your rates through the roof.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2016 at 11:22 UTC as 1st comment

I figured it was just a matter of time before someone used a 'phone to prove they are up to the task.

Thanks for sharing your pics, they look fine to me.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2016 at 10:54 UTC as 27th comment
On article Getty Images sued again, this time by Zuma Press (66 comments in total)

Apparently the only misconception involved is that Getty has somehow been honest in its business dealings.

Look for more plaintiffs now that someone had the courage to go after them in court.

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2016 at 04:31 UTC as 8th comment
Total: 57, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »