Has a website at
Joined on Jan 24, 2013


Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10
On article CP+ 2014: Hands-on with Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II (196 comments in total)

I reviewed the original G1X and I loved the image quality.... but that's about it. The ergonomics didn't make a lot of sense (why didn't they just take ergonomics from an already mature G-series cameras?) and the AF was mediocre. But the potential was there. This new version looks amazing. I can't wait to review soon.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2014 at 03:09 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

AdamT: Yep, Ricoh have a long history of uglifying the GR series to make special editions no one wants and never become collectable, you`d think they`d learn .. remember the yucky blue GRD .......

Sometimes what's ugly to you is beautiful to another...I think Saab cars are ugly, but there's people who love them. Same as the old square Volvo's...sometimes the uglier and the more unique, people find it beautiful...

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 05:39 UTC
In reply to:

Johannes Zander: They should ask Hasselblad for help about wooden grips. And then charge $10.000. Below that price I don't take cameras with wooden grips serious.

Wood grips last longer than leather grips, and some like to modify the shape of the grip by sanding it down to the shape of their hands, as was the case with the Pentax 67...

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 05:36 UTC
In reply to:

JohnEwing: It's OK. But who the hell would want it?

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder... I've seen some guys with some pretty hideous looking clothes, but hey, if they like it, who am I to judge. I've also seen people's significant other that I don't find very attractive, but who am I to tell them that they made a bad choice? It's only my opinion...

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 05:35 UTC
In reply to:

wayne131: Just buy the original version, it is a stunning camera.

Well it's not cheaper if you consider the 3 extra accessories that you're getting. If you were planning on buying those accessories anyway, then it's pretty much the same price... actually slightly cheaper.... buy it's true. I think the black does look better...

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 05:32 UTC
In reply to:

Tord S Eriksson: The cost, of the accessories, is actually very decent, compared to what you have to pay for similar items to your Olympus m4/3 camera!

Exactly, basically if you like the look of the green, then you're paying for the cost of the accessories. It's a good deal... it's still cheaper than the Nikon Coolpix A by $200!! You can add the 21mm wide angle lens with that!! Or OVF!

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 05:30 UTC
In reply to:

JWest: I know very little about the Ricoh GR itself, but I think I might be the only person here who thinks this special edition actually looks pretty nice.

I've ordered one because I think it looks decent, and all the extras you get with it. I was going to buy all those things separate anyways on the regular GR, so I'm actually saving money buying the Ltd. Edition. Good on Ricoh for not trying to charge too much extra. If it was a Leica, Nikon, or Sony, you think they would only add $100?

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 05:27 UTC
In reply to:

babujr: 1. Is this Special Edition GR available only through the Ricoh sales center or will it be available also from B&H, Adorama, and others?

2. The body is said to be of magnesium alloy - so is the regular GR, right? Nothing special about the material of the Special Edition?

Hey Jack, don't forget, one is on hold for me, even though I'll be in Japan when it arrives!! I think for the extra $100 retail, you get the filter adapter and hood, case and strap, which is worth more than $100 reg retail... it's a bargain... the rest is just aesthetics on the body. It won't take better pictures. You'll just look more unique getting it... or silly, depending on your opinion...

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 05:23 UTC
On article Fujifilm XQ1 First Impressions Review (163 comments in total)
In reply to:

dark goob: Why not use degrees instead of "equivalent mm"? Equivalent to what? Hardly anyone (less than 5% of photographers) shoots 135 anymore. IT'S NOT 2003 ANYMORE!

Also if you used degrees then your graph's horizontal scale wouldn't be so compressed to the left and stretched out to the right.

You're right about degrees (180 deg for fisheye, 90 deg for 20mm equiv, etc.) but you know, sometimes certain standards just stick around even though it makes no sense. The term ISO for film doesn't really make sense for digital, and most users don't understand what ISO means or what it stands for, but hey, it's become the standard way to describe "digital grain"...look at the way sensor size is described. It's a mess. 1/1.7"? Most don't even know the history of APS and that it was a failed film format in the 90's. How about just diagonal distance in mm? So instead of full-frame, we say 35mm, which is the diagonal distance of the sensor. Ha ha...anyway, things change so quick now that it's hard to stick to a standard that makes sense...but good point!

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 05:26 UTC
On article Pentax Ricoh updates firmware for GR Digital IV (12 comments in total)
In reply to:

Andrew Elliott: A great camera with fantastic ergonomics and lens..
Can't wait for the GRD 5 with an RX100 sensor!

Here's the 'official' rumor link.... it makes sense since Ricoh submitted a patent on 2 new lens designs, both in APS-C format:

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2013 at 18:10 UTC
Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10