wlad

Lives in EU
Joined on Sep 16, 2010

Comments

Total: 235, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

aandeg: Well dpreview does better at hosting trolls than reviewing cameras. At least your good at something!

Camera is not for me and I am a N1 user. Missed the mark as does those fiddly and over priced MFT cameras. Though for them it seems being overpriced is a positive.

which 5 generations old APS-C Nikon outperforms the OMD EM1 ?

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 12:02 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kipplemaster: Could DPReview please start listing lack of USB charging a a con rather than the current practice of listing "lack of included charger" as a con for cameras with have the advantage of USB charging. Particularly for cameras which might be used for travel, for those of use who are not fans of packing random proprietary massive plastic accessories USB charging is a major plus.

@Kipplemaster - every Li-ion battery is a fire hazard - basically every single cellphone model has documented (although rare) cases of battery melting while charging - search for yourself. That's why you should NEVER leave a Li-ion battery in a charger unattended.

I would rather have the battery melt a $50 charger than a $2500 camera.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium-ion_battery#Safety

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 10:54 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

zettlers: This one is not for me so I hate it and expect everyone else to do the same!

Those users who would never take the card out of the camera are exactly those clueless newbies who bought the wrong camera.

This is supossed to be an "enthusiast" camera. Meaning RAW. And since the high FPS/fast AF is the only selling point of this camera, that means LOTS of RAWs. And 200-300 MB per minute of video footage.

Not many users will want to waste the camera battery transferring photos/videos over the slow USB2 connection.

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 10:43 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sonyshine: A brilliant little action and wildlife camera from Nikon.
I really , really want one!

BUT....

Why is the EVF a separate extra?
What on earth were they thinking of with Micro SD cards?

The retail price is hysterically funny - no way will I pay anything near what they want for this camera when my V1 can do most of the things the V3 can do.

I still think this camera is a (potential) winner but Nikon's marketing department need to take a long walk off a short pier...

My J1 is large, that's why I'm selling my Nikon 1 gear (10-30mm, 30-110mm and 18.5) and moving to RX100 mark3 - as soon as the price drops

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 10:06 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

aandeg: Well dpreview does better at hosting trolls than reviewing cameras. At least your good at something!

Camera is not for me and I am a N1 user. Missed the mark as does those fiddly and over priced MFT cameras. Though for them it seems being overpriced is a positive.

the problem is that a 5 generations old MFT camera still outperforms the latest generation Nikon 1 sensor...

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 10:01 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: DPReview Quote:

Page 14: Conclusion, CONS: last item

"HIGH PRICE TAG"

If only Nee Con listened to those 3 words, they would be better off.

But nah... Nee CON.

.

..it's a tradition that defines the product line - remember V1, V2 ?

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2014 at 23:53 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kipplemaster: Could DPReview please start listing lack of USB charging a a con rather than the current practice of listing "lack of included charger" as a con for cameras with have the advantage of USB charging. Particularly for cameras which might be used for travel, for those of use who are not fans of packing random proprietary massive plastic accessories USB charging is a major plus.

using a $2500 camera as a dumb $20 battery charger is something most people are probably not really that comfortable with..

you know, we're dealing with unstable Li-ion batteries that can easily catch fire when something goes wrong while charging...

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2014 at 23:41 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kipplemaster: Could DPReview please start listing lack of USB charging a a con rather than the current practice of listing "lack of included charger" as a con for cameras with have the advantage of USB charging. Particularly for cameras which might be used for travel, for those of use who are not fans of packing random proprietary massive plastic accessories USB charging is a major plus.

USB charging makes sense for smartphones and toy cameras with built-in battery only. It's pretty much useless (takes forever) for charging high capacity batteries in real cameras.

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2014 at 22:47 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

mwstebbins: I believe that's it's unfair to criticize this camera for "Uses micoSD cards (easy to lose)" I welcome the smaller size if it means a smaller/lighter camera.

What I want in these new cameras is USB 3. m2cw

Q: does the microSD card really make the camera smaller ?
A: no, it doesn't - there are smaller cameras that use full size SD already on the market

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2014 at 22:38 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kipplemaster: Could DPReview please start listing lack of USB charging a a con rather than the current practice of listing "lack of included charger" as a con for cameras with have the advantage of USB charging. Particularly for cameras which might be used for travel, for those of use who are not fans of packing random proprietary massive plastic accessories USB charging is a major plus.

I don't care about USB connectors on a camera - I have NEVER used them.
What *I* want is a standalone charger, so if a camera doesn't come with one, that means I'll have to pay additional $50-60 for a charger. That's definitely a con.
USB charging is a meh.

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2014 at 22:33 UTC
In reply to:

Danny: Very beautiful, but these kind of images could have been done much easier imho, studio shots with some wind and wires, then post processing, if done well no-one will ever tell the difference.

@Ollie 2 - absolutely !
http://twistedsifter.com/2013/08/cgi-artworks-that-look-like-photographs/

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 10:53 UTC
On article Sony announces pricing and availability for Alpha 7S (131 comments in total)
In reply to:

wlad: anyone seen Canikon ? are they still around ?

right, nikon released a J4 and S2 lately....

..or the 400mm f2.8, right, but that gear is not for the masses. A small fullframe mirrorless camera is.

Link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 09:06 UTC
On article Sony announces pricing and availability for Alpha 7S (131 comments in total)

anyone seen Canikon ? are they still around ?

right, nikon released a J4 and S2 lately....

Link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 07:18 UTC as 25th comment | 3 replies
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

ThePhilips: A mirrorless without PDAF in this age??

why ?
A NEX-like Leica costing 3 times as much as a NEX is just as ridiculous as a VW Polo-like Ferrari selling for $70k.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 10:36 UTC
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

ThePhilips: A mirrorless without PDAF in this age??

@Richard, every 40 years old car is considered "a classic" and has more value that it had when it was manufactured

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:36 UTC
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

ThePhilips: A mirrorless without PDAF in this age??

if Ferrari made a 3 cylinder 1.2l "budget" car, nobody would complain that it does not have a flappy paddle gearbox. Everybody would just have a laugh and move on.
And that's exactly what's going to happen with this camera.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:27 UTC
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Joachim Gerstl: Leica goes Hasselblad.

Looks like an overpriced NEX 3 to me. But I guess I'm just ignorant.

..and they didn't even bother adding those terrible wooden grips... seriously, how are they expecting to sell this ?

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:10 UTC
In reply to:

straylightrun: $1000 for a 70-300 telephoto lens.....?

AAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHA...... HA.

please use a low-pass filter next time, I'm seeing Moire in your post

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 08:14 UTC
On article Eye-Fi Mobi Wi-Fi SD card review (107 comments in total)
In reply to:

Just a Photographer: Why should we still use Eye-Fi cards now in most places we can use a 4G network?

Next to that in todays world not only your phone has wifi already, but most (consumer) camera's have wifi too.

Few years ago these cards came in handy, but nowadays aren't these eye-fi card mostly redundant? Its only a matter of time before Eye-fi will be out of business.

these cards were pretty much useless even back then..
Most people don't have a studio, so they don't need to review low-res images on a tablet/PC after each shot.
And these cards are useless for transferring full resolution pictures, not to mention RAWs. The abysmal maximum transfer speeds of 1.5MB/s make this just a toy, really.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2014 at 08:43 UTC
In reply to:

RichRMA: Ferrari licensed their name to a number of companies, including William Optics a Taiwanese telescope company. I would like to know exactly what changes Hasselblad made to the 99.

did Ferrari sell a rebadged KIA ?

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 08:06 UTC
Total: 235, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »