wlad
Lives in
EU
Joined on
Sep 16, 2010
|
Comments
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Only one left by Niceborn from A Single Seed - Macro | Speedway rivals handshake by Bristol Smarty from Sportsmanship | Rainy night, NYC by KBTinto from A rainy day... | Pella by AnitaPhotos from Floor | London City Hall by Wight_man from Your City - Curved Buildings | Loud Tornado on take off by gordzam from Loud | girls in stroller by etchesktch from Serious - Whimsical |
Beginner's GuidesGetting Started
In-depth testingLatest Camera Reviews
Beyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videos
real world performanceField Test Videos
see how we seeSample Galleries
In-depth ReviewFujifilm X100F
Show CoverageHits and Misses from CP+ 2017
Throwback ThursdayClassic Cameras from Days Past
2463FeatureWhat is equivalence?
What's that Noise?Shedding some light on the sources of noise
umm, what's the point ?
...because silver is known for its stable color and long life
wlad: RJ45 ??? what the hell for ? wireless can go up to a couple of hundred of Mbps, why wired ? Is this supposed to stream the video directly ?
@notime: the very first sentence from your link:
The good news is that it doesn't have to suck, if you build it out properly.
wlad: RJ45 ??? what the hell for ? wireless can go up to a couple of hundred of Mbps, why wired ? Is this supposed to stream the video directly ?
I've specifically written Mbps, can't you read ?
If your wireless performance is "theoretical", get a network engineer to upgrade your network.
RJ45 ??? what the hell for ? wireless can go up to a couple of hundred of Mbps, why wired ? Is this supposed to stream the video directly ?
wlad: €1200 for a P&S is just ridiculous
umm, the difference between a 1" sensor and a modern APS-C sensor is roughly the same as between a cell phone camera and a 1" P&S... it has nowhere near the dynamic range or the low read noise of the larger sensor
€1200 for a P&S is just ridiculous
just because you can, doesn't mean you should....
cosinaphile: i find it sad that these cameras are one of the few growth areas in photo hardware...while point and shoots are decimated by overused crappy phonecams
... im sure many dont share my dismay , but some , I think, may..
id like to see more larger sensor compacts with as close to 1 inch sensors as possible
x30 sized or better even the decent 1\1.7 ...1.8 type like the lx5 had ... its past time for a curved sensor in compacts that would drastically reduce cost size and complexity of optics for such machines ....
tiny sensor cams .. action\ waterproof or not\cellphones and then m4\3 or apsc
that a gulf in sensor goodness ... a camera catagory being slowly being ignored toward possible extinction
at least enthusiast level sensor cams still exist from nikon fuji canon olympus sony and panny [ who did i miss] im hoping more people discover this type of machine and it does not follow regular point and shoots into oblivion .
well, those "crappy phonecams" are obviously good enough for most people, so it's pretty much down to m43/aps-c or a phone
I can't remember when was the last time I used my Nikon 1. There's simply no reason to use it. I'll take my D7000 if I really want a decent quality. Anything smaller (sensor wise) makes absolutely no sense.
ZJ24: It looks like a good device. However, every time I read a Dxo One ad with that kind of hyperbole -"professional quality", "pro-quality camera", "professional shoot" - WOW guys, I'm sure you bring the same balanced assessment to your reviews of the products of other manufacturers products.
"Pro quality" is obviously an entirely empty and meaningless statement now.
@David Zamora looks like every backlit cellphone photo I have ever taken... blown sky, underexposed shadows, you totally killed the dynamic range in post processing
Don't get me wrong, it's a nice picture and all, but it's not really a good example of what the camera is capable of.
aramgrg: "non-removable Li-Ion battery and USB 2.0"
Yeah, you guys seem very new in the action cam market.
not calling it a 4K camera when in fact it's just a low definition camera would be a good start
aramgrg: "non-removable Li-Ion battery and USB 2.0"
Yeah, you guys seem very new in the action cam market.
there's no 4K - the resulting image will always be low definition - no matter what device you use to view it - as long as you only have 2 eyes, you will only see low definition footage from this camera
aramgrg: "non-removable Li-Ion battery and USB 2.0"
Yeah, you guys seem very new in the action cam market.
it's a $350 toy, not a $500 "action camera"
Sannaborjeson: Such poor quality jpegs at 100%... makes it totally impossible to make any opinion on the lens.
Also, why don't you hire a pro photographer for such samples? Only bearded guy is ok while the rest of the photos are thoughtless and of no value.
wouldn't say "thoughful", but that's the only photo with a half-decent light, the rest is pretty terrible
aramgrg: "non-removable Li-Ion battery and USB 2.0"
Yeah, you guys seem very new in the action cam market.
umm, I'm sure all those 4 people with VR glasses will be happy to buy one - hope that pays for R&D
aramgrg: "non-removable Li-Ion battery and USB 2.0"
Yeah, you guys seem very new in the action cam market.
Doesn't matter.
Any way you look at the recorded footage, it's still only standard definition.
It's supposed to be an action camera, so I'm comparing it against other action cameras.
aramgrg: "non-removable Li-Ion battery and USB 2.0"
Yeah, you guys seem very new in the action cam market.
but hey, they bring features that nobody wants, image quality matching $50 Chinese no-name cameras*, at a price that no-one is going to pay.. it will be a hit !
* - take a look at sample videos - it's actually just standard definition in every direction of view
misha marinsky4: Popular Photography used to do this. For example, March 1981, pages 108, 120, and 121.
Also, keep in mind that a digital camera in reality is a computer with a lens. If it breaks after two years, it's not worth fixing. 99% of the chips will be obsolete.
I'm sure you throw away your car after your windshield wipers need replacing as well
CameraLabTester: Canon Sentinel: "The enemy has released a 24-70 FF f2.8 VR lens! I think we should abandon our yoga position on this fence..."
Grand Canon Moff Tarkin: "Evacuate? ... In our moment of triumph? I think you are over estimating their chances!"
(slaps sentinel like Batman did to Robin...)
.
umm, hasn't Canon released a similar lens like 3-4 years ago ?
BarnET: Wow Nikon,
great specs and reasonable prices for all 3 of them
especially the 200-500mm
Really reasonable ?
With every other new "consumer electronic" product, we get more features for less money. With Nikon lenses, there's always a 25-30% price hike. The prices have seriously gotten out of hand. $2400 for a standard zoom is ridiculous.