ManfredGrebler

Marc: Thank you.... - I have been taking photos for 40 years now. And even in the analog period the use of UV filters was VERY controversial. Maybe in the very early days of photography UV filters...

Looks like a good option when you travel with different camera brands / battery types. But than, if the only charger breaks you will cry.

I don't use UV filters in 99.99 %. But I have some (or "protection filters") for special situations. For example in front of a waterfall with lot of mist in the air. (I have to clean the filter...

SteveAnderson: Please read my post again. And differ between "normal" ND filters and graduated ND filters.

I agree with polarizers and ND filters.
UV filters have been unnecessary even in the analog world.
Graduated ND filters, well, in my opinion post processing gives better results, all the more if...

Class A:
EVF is a question of DSLR or Mirrorless, nothing to do with video.
OSPDAF is also QUITE useful for still with mirrorless cameras.
Don't know how you get the idea of noise vs. video ability...

No IS can always work 100% perfect. You will often see (very small) artifacts. In case of long exposure these are negligible compared to shake blur. But for short exposure times you risk a drawback...

The 55-200 is not really a poor lens. But I think it is the wrong lens to test a camera.

This lens isn't good at f5 and I see various jpeg and sharping artifacts. Unfortunately the RAW file download does not work.

Fuji offers completely free RAW converters.

Why always looking at the price only and why should APSC be cheaper than FF? The target audience is a different one. I own Nikon and Fuji. Look at the size and weight of Nikon's Z prime lenses. And...

SD is too small and fragile for professional use. And SD express is far in the future, while CFExpress is now. Do you really think that pros spending some 10.000 $ for their camera equipment care...

Just wait for a cash back promo. I'm sure it will come soon.

It depends what kind of artist you are. For an "Instagram artist" this might be ok. "Real" artists want their work printed in large formats, and than you will see the difference.

I think it is not the trademark but the design of iphone is also protected.

"Fair use" - if it applies in this case - is something in the US. But movies are usually shown worlwide. In other countries other legal rules are valid.

The decision is very reasonable. No commercial software company can live with "free updates for ever". Except - like Topaz labs did in the past - you always make a "all new" product and cancel the...

Some people seems to have their own very strange definition of "subscription model".

Why should i be influenced by ads that are in no way relevant for me?

I often wonder who are the most stupid? Companies spending big $ for ads nobody wants to see and providing no roi. Or people who get really influenced by these ads and spend money because of that.