Fotookes

Joined on Jan 20, 2020

Comments

Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Here's our wish list for the Nikon Z6 II and Z7 II (619 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sickheadache: Nikon Proved to Thom Hogan and Me...Nikon Donโ€™t Listen.

If Nikon had done the right thing, two years ago, we all still would not be yapping about Two Card Slots, Wonky AF, and A Functional Battery Grip.

Nikon was suppose to be on their job and Produce a Couple of Leading Cameras to beat the likes of Sony...THAT DID NOT HAPPEN...with less than 250,000 Z6 and Z7 Cameras sent out..compared to Sonyโ€™s 4.1 Million...Nikon is at the bottom of the barrel. Get Freaking Serious Nikon! Nikon you are Still 3-4 Years behind Everyone. Grow Up.

Ridiculous indeed, but here on the forum it is considered 'practicing one's hobby'... Bwaahaahaaaaaa!!!

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2020 at 13:44 UTC
On article Sony a7C review: Compact size, big sensor image quality (2231 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fotookes: Fro said it, and I'll repeat it: this is an a7III with its 'prisma' cut off!!! All that talk about compact size and travel camera and blablabla.... Rubbish! It is an a7III without the top!

An a7III IN SIZE you dummies!! Don't you people READ?? ANd MAGNAR W, I could actually have done it at home myself: JUST HAVE TO CUT OFF THE PRISMA...

Happy FEET-ZOOMING!

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2020 at 15:34 UTC
On article Sony a7C review: Compact size, big sensor image quality (2231 comments in total)

Fro said it, and I'll repeat it: this is an a7III with its 'prisma' cut off!!! All that talk about compact size and travel camera and blablabla.... Rubbish! It is an a7III without the top!

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2020 at 10:32 UTC as 178th comment | 6 replies
On article Sony a7C review: Compact size, big sensor image quality (2231 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jeffjeab: Comments are meant to create more buzz and the more the comments means more people visit dp website

And if not you can still zoom with your feet'!

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2020 at 10:30 UTC
In reply to:

Peter1976: Hm... To my eyes that silver looks cheap, plastically :(. But that's just me maybe..

It is!

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2020 at 02:22 UTC
On article How does anamorphic photography work? (199 comments in total)
In reply to:

moimoi: Squeeze the lemon...

...and get lemonade!

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2020 at 06:21 UTC
On article How does anamorphic photography work? (199 comments in total)

And if shove comes to push in the end, remember that you can always zoom with your feet...

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2020 at 13:22 UTC as 71st comment | 3 replies

20MP?? You gotta be kidding... Count me out. I don't come out of bed for less than 45!

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2020 at 02:55 UTC as 28th comment | 5 replies
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS R5 (526 comments in total)
In reply to:

ScapingFeet: Real question . . . when can I purchase it ?

Why? You suffering from something terminal?

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2020 at 12:37 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS R5 (526 comments in total)
In reply to:

mariuss: I was prepeared to buy it asap it will be on sell. Even preorder it (my first time) withouth any reviews.
My dream camera, i thought ... till today, when i saw this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-g800lZMPo&list=WL&index=2&t=1s

Bang! Thank you Max! I hate you btw. :)

Really Canon? I understand overheating in 8K ... i understand overheating in 4K 120p ... i even understand overheating in 4K 60p till some point ... but pls, really? Overheating in 4K 30p??? And then the cooling time required to use the camera again ... .

Now i will wait for realtime reviews, but i wonder, what can it change when Canon itself recognize the issue?!

I also wonder if R6 have the same heating issue.

You fell for a YouTube hoax!! ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2020 at 12:36 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS R5 (526 comments in total)
In reply to:

m_black: Congrats Canon! I'm a long time Nikon user with a couple of Z6's, and the R5 looks like an amazing beast of a camera. I have several industry friends with R's and I've been telling them this is the first Canon to tempt me. Very happy for Canon users today! Can't wait to hear of production models in use.

Don't go jumping ship now!!!

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2020 at 12:35 UTC

As long as people keep zooming with their feet this is of little or no consequence! M4/3 is death,long live APS-C!!

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2020 at 07:12 UTC as 103rd comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Mortal Lion: They should have made it 35-200 2.8-4 :p

Or a 28-40mm f/3,5-200!

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2020 at 10:11 UTC

Why not a 20-2000mm f/1.8???? C'mon Tokina!

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2020 at 10:11 UTC as 40th comment
On article Ricoh video details the next flagship Pentax APS-C DSLR (655 comments in total)
In reply to:

Astro Landscapes: Long live the Pentax! I would give anything for a mirrorless K-1...

Even your right nut!?!?

Link | Posted on May 19, 2020 at 04:16 UTC
In reply to:

YoPo: What baffles me is that in the film era, my standard lens was a 85mm prime. After years of digital photography, I found the 30mm to be my standard lens.

Is it the camera technology?
Is it my age?
Is it the way that we look at pictures?
or maybe something else.

Who the hell uses an 85 as a standard lens??? Portrait photographer? If not, what on earth would a change from film to digital have to do anything with it!?
Maybe it is something else...

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2020 at 12:46 UTC

Most photographers zoom with their hands, but some seem to manage it with their feet... Amazing!!

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2020 at 12:44 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

sknai16: I agree with you. The 35mm f2 lens on my D700 was my goto travel and wedding lens for years. I'd close it down to f4 and have a virtually 100% sharp lens in all circumstances. For street and travel photo it was unbeatable. For portraits I'd use the 85 f 1.8 and with those two lenses I covered most of my needs, apart from when I needed the 70-200, but mostly I'd rather use my feet to zoom in or out, when that was possible. I now shoot more with a D500 and a D850 and I use the 24mm for the D500 and the 35 F1.8 for the D850.
I have other lenses, but none get as much use as the 35mm.

Zooming with his feet! So how many steps does it takes to get from a 35mm to a 50mm for example?? Or from a 35mm to a 20mm????? Tell me! Tell me!!!

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2020 at 14:59 UTC
In reply to:

Bigsensorisbest: While respecting your position and liking the 35mm focal length I cant stand primes I use zooms constantly , with the great quality they have these days and usually on a monopod/tripod its easier to frame and add variety to the look of a set of pictures

Zooming with your feet, he....... How about framing with your feet?
If you think you can zoom with your feet, then you should get a Nobel Prize for Optical Illusions!!

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2020 at 06:15 UTC

And in case of an emergency, you can always 'zoom with your feet'... Bwaahaahaaaa!

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2020 at 06:07 UTC as 59th comment
Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »