sadatoni
Lives in
Lewis Center, OH, United States
Works as a
Systems Programmer
Joined on
Sep 25, 2007
|
Comments
 |  |  |  |
| Northern Harrier by OSP2017 from High Noon [New Shot] | Kestrel’s royal landing.. by amj29 from Nikon Camera - Specific Equipment Challenge | Pelmo at sunset by mazzuccato from Landscape | Short-eared Owl by Fotorequest from A big year - Birds 2021 |
Great article. Lots of good information. Love that shot of Snoqualmie Falls.
Professor999: Just read the 'Control' page & the Cons list;
No dedicated af point control-yes there is, if you want to customise it that way
Nested menus-all cameras have nested menus, otherwise there would be a 100 tabs-once the camera is set up, there's little reason to menu hunt.
2 dials plus an extra one which can set for a number of different functions, green button is customisable. Even the screen is customisable.
All this is written in the section but is listed as a Con.
That's my biggest dissapointment with the review - most of the cons are personal preferences and not a design fault.
Looks interesting. I wonder how it compares to the original Pen-F (I had one)?
What an ugly camera.
Is it half-frame like the old Pen F's it looks like?
I'm confused. In this review, the 100% coverage viewfinder is mentioned as a prod, but in the K-3 review it is not mentioned. In this review, "6 fps burst rate (7 fps in 1.3x crop mode) is mentioned as a pro". The K-3 review says "Good buffer depth and continuous shooting rate" for a pro. It's over 8 fps. There are other disparities of this type as well.
"Relatively unrefined onscreen interface". What? Isn't that a personal preference kind of thing?