LJ - Eljot

Nikon had promised enthusiast compacts with 1"-type sensors:
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/2032485397/
Cancled:
https://www.dpreview.com/news/6864148000/

you can go even wider with even larger sensors.

No, 600mm is great. You can use it as a short tele for portraits on a 8"by10" camera and also as an ultra tele on mft.

Why mithical? Look at broadcast lenses!

It is brick walls. The best type of picture ever.

But on mft.

But occationally something becomes better. I think there was am improvement with truepic VII introduced in the E-M1:
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympus-om-d-e-m1/12
"The E-M1 also appears to...

Yes, compatibility. There has always been the annoying fact, that some corrections from Panasonic lenses are not done by Olympus cameras and vice versa. That was really bad for the whole mft...

I would never buy a camera again that does not have both a viewfinder AND a titlable/swivel-screen. I use the sreen most of the time and it es so convenient to work with close to the ground. But...

Oh, I thought they are refereing to the actual Platon (Πλάτων). I thought that question was funny. But I just learned that he is called Plato in english. Can I change my vote?

Or metering on a grey card, or using an incident-light meter.

Unfortunalty they are even more expensive and have no AF.

Already at f/1.4 it is so sharp that you get false colour artifact on fine details and moire as well. And that on a 60MP body. I think it is time for higher resolution sensors now. Or get low pass...

Ha, I was a bit suprised that they did not have one already.
It is seven years after the first GM lenses. Ok, I had missed the 1.2, but that was also five years after the 85mm GM.

I actually got gid of the Sony 50mm 1.8 because of the AF. The images were nice looking, but it was out of focus too often, because it was too slow. I have replaced it with a Samyang 45mm 1.8.

Zeiss Otus would be another comparison.

This is a bit off topic, isn't it?
This lens is for L-mount. It covers an image circle of 43.3mm.

Yes, I remember der advertisments. "Smaller but same quality as 35mm due to better film emulsions." (X) doubt
Sure it had nice feautures.

Well, ok. That seems to be true. Only for four thirds.

But also it was not made for four thirds, or even APC-C. It is lens for 35mm that was also built with mft mount. I would rather buy the canon...

Sigma has made the 150mm f/2.8 for mft.

Lenstip said, that you need a lens to stop 2 stops down to reach maximum performance. But that is not true for several mft lenses.