GPAtlanta
Lives in
GA, United States
Works as a
Systems Admin/Computer Geek
Joined on
Jan 23, 2009
|
Comments
 |  |  |  |  |  |
| PA020047.Bald Eagle Approach.2 by Hornsbee from BIF | The king of the mountain by Dan Paris from Landscape with Wildlife | Couples' oh No moment! by mythshri from Seated Couples | Big eyes by Minas_Eye from Eye - macro/close-up | Bon appetit! by valenttin from Van een mug een olifant maken | THREE BOWLER HATS by FINEART4YPvK from Men Wearing Hats |
Georgeee: The only way to play Adobe is to buy 10 shares of its stock and the gain will pay for the subscription plus a lens every 2 years. If you cannot beat it, join it.
You can beat it, shall I mention the multitude of options?
Don't know why anyone would use this..
elefteriadis alexandros: Blown highlight as usual with all digital cameras. Nothing ''special'' here.
After almost two decades of ''innovation'' and the problem persist.
This might be the dumbest statement I have ever read.
It's too big for sure..
RomanLevin: I'm user of first LX100! It's amazing camera, but I will not buy new one, because there are no critical improvements.
I wait for:
1) Articulated display - none
2) Swap of focus and aperture ring (focus ring is very close to body in v1.) - none
3) Highspeed video (more than 100 fps) - none
4) Increasing of sensor resolution - yes
5) Some kinds of dust and weather protection - none
Anything else was great in Mark 1. Anounced improvments are very weak:(
The Fuji XF10 is half the price, more compact and has an apsc sensor. Panasonic behind the times.
Onur Otlu: Thanks for the article. It's indeed a "novelty", after the digital age, to immediately share a photo with people. I've been eyeing these "mini mobile printers" for a while, to toss in my camera bag and use with a NEX camera with Wi-Fi through my phone/tablet.
I think the biggest two competitors are the Instax SP1 featured above and Polaroid's ZINK printer.
If anyone has used (or seen results from) both, could you share your thoughts about which one would make a smarter purchase? Are their prints roughly the same size? Sharpness? Durability of prints?
I've also seen a similar printer from LG but its prints always had a magenta tint so I didn't really consider it.
I was looking at one of these or the Canon Selphy, seems like the quality of the Selphy is much better but you lose portability. Also prints on the Fuji are pricey.. It does work with the XT-1 I shoot though... Decisions..