Boerseuntjie

Boerseuntjie

Lives in Canada Canada
Joined on Feb 13, 2012

Comments

Total: 460, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
In reply to:

tkbslc: This is an exciting concept at about $800. At $1500, I don't think it is going to have many takers.

More like $500

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 19:44 UTC

Does Samsung still make cameras?...LOL, they should stick to washing machines and phones

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 19:43 UTC as 31st comment | 11 replies
In reply to:

Tap0: Every six months I change the mount...

Every six months they change their mount, do you relize how stupid you sound? at least they are doing something, if it was not for them you would still pay more for less from your nice friends at Nikon and Canon, I say let them push the market it only benefit us all.
What is Nikon doing? going back to the past with a shiny turd that makes Nikon sheep forget how bad the D600 was, yes that is how you do it, smoke and mirrors...LOL
This Sony has no lenses is getting old, you can put any lens on E mount even those so called excellent Nikon and Canon junk

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 16:38 UTC
On article Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows (1392 comments in total)
In reply to:

Allochka Emiliana: Nikon got worried about Sony A7 and A7r that they released this rumor in a hurry!

I agree all Nikon did is take a D600 and put a fancy shell on it ;)
3 years R&D are you joking?

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 21:51 UTC
On article Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows (1392 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jake64: Can someone clarify just what makes this camera so special other than the fact it looks like it's 40 years old? This is a serious question.

It does not look all that old, Sony made this camera back in 2009 the A900

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 21:26 UTC
On article Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows (1392 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boerseuntjie: Look a D610 with retarded shell and no Video....LOL is it just me or does it look like a Sony A900
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2008/09/sony-a900-is-of.html

Why would I be jealous I already own a camera that does not shoot video the Sony A900...LOL and wait for it,.... It has the same sensor as this camera...LOL

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 21:06 UTC
On article Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows (1392 comments in total)

Look a D610 with retarded shell and no Video....LOL is it just me or does it look like a Sony A900
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2008/09/sony-a900-is-of.html

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 20:53 UTC as 342nd comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Elikan: Before reading the article I looked at the pictures and in my taste the samsung pictures were the most pleasing . What I liked most in the Samsung was its natural colors. Usually I discard pictures where the colors are not right. I guess that most smartphone users also value correct colors. Smartphone pictures are rarely enlarged to a size where the weaknesses of the Samsung camera described in the article matter.
A possible explanation for Samsung's caring for the colors, is that of all the g four compared makes, Samsung is the only one that manufactures cameras

Do you realize how stupid you sound? Samsung fanboy

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 16:25 UTC
On a photo in the Sony Alpha 7 samples gallery sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

Najinsky: Shutter speed too low, or shutter shock?

F8

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 18:13 UTC
On photo DSC00020 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

Najinsky: Shutter speed too low, or shutter shock?

F8

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 18:13 UTC

I like what I see, I was hoping to dust off my Minolta MD and Voigtländer M lenses and use them on this camera, lets hope they work.

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 22:31 UTC as 78th comment
In reply to:

chlamchowder: Looks ok, although it seems like some detail is lost to noise reduction even in the base ISO shots. Moving up the ISO scale, it still seems like the JPG engine should be doing a better job (because modern full frame sensors are so good that anything below ISO 800 is basically considered low).

It would be more interesting to look at processed raw files without noise reduction applied.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/camera-reviews/sony/a7r/sony-a7rGALLERY.HTM
These are raw files and you can use Sony software for the raw conversion, just switch off all the in camera stuff and have a look
http://esupport.sony.com/p/swu-download.pl?upd_id=2697&SMB=YES
http://support.d-imaging.sony.co.jp/www/disoft/int/ids/operation/index.html

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 22:18 UTC
On article Sample gallery: Sony's 20.7-megapixel Xperia Z1 (58 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Scurvy Dog of PR: Didn't I read that Sony was getting out of the Cell Phone biz?

So Panasonic makes Cell phones that is news to me

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 17:59 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2082 comments in total)
In reply to:

lazy lightning: Still just the same flat, lifeless images as all m4/3 cameras. No separation (not talking bokeh), everything in the image appears to be on the same plane giving the impression of a one dimensional universe. Lovely colors though!

+1 I must be a troll

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 22:36 UTC
On article Another Hasselblad rebadge or Photoshopped hoax? (184 comments in total)

Fake but don't count it out there will be one soon

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 18:55 UTC as 140th comment
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II Review (514 comments in total)
In reply to:

Alex Permit: For me, a "satisfying photographic experience" is taking photos and then being satisfied with the results when i look and/or print them at home.

The images i get from my rx100 ii are satisfying, while those from my previous powershots/Lumix/ et al are not. I know of no other POCKETABLE camera that gives pictures which satisfy but for the rx 100.

DPR's objective tests back up my subjective views.

The "user experience" of the rx 100 does not match my x100s, or even my nex 6. Those cameras, however, don't fit in my pants pocket. Neither does my D3s. So what. Each camera size class fits a purpose.

The rx100 is, imho, a clear gold star.

WW2 Design... LOL, well WW2 gave us the "A" bomb and the RX100 is the" Bomb" Who cares if it's silver?, I think it should be Uranium with a Atomic clow
@Boky you must be wearing hot pants ;)

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2013 at 21:49 UTC
Total: 460, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »