Snoddas

Switch is mainly because of lenses but also that I want a compact and light FF camera without (or weak) AA filter without excessive amounts of pixels. Nor D800 or D750 fits into that. Still going ...

DR of the 6D Mk ii seem to be identical to the Nikon D3S released back in 2009. Low light ISO is a slightly better on the D3S though, but very close in performance. Never thought that when I ...

Ok, thanks for the comparison, it does not look that bad, or perhaps it does, depending on expectations. Perhaps people have expected a bit more improvement vs the 6D. Here is the test I saw: "The ...

GFX is nice but the X1D is slightly more tempting IMO...:-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEp9X9hRprk

The figures i have seen look worse than 6d DR is less than 10 stops above Iso 800, even worse than my d500..But detail is better in mkii,been spoiled by nikon/sony,  diff probably not visible at ...

Excellent article Mako!

Perspective distortion depends on distance to subject not FOV. FOV depends on focal length and sensor size. MF have the edge in this area but I wouldn't buy MF anyway. FF is good enough IMO. But I ...

This is a bit frustrating..6D II should be a GREAT camera...and it seems at first sight with good specs and features. Prices is high though. But video AF etc is better than Nikon. I guess Canon ...

Nikon do the same, product segmentation, why remove a memory card slot from the D7500 for example,  and they put a control button ruining the deeper grip that actually was an improvement from the ...

it’s very difficult to design a fast wide that’s also a) distortion free and b) sufficiently aberration free that it can still split the scene into planes with a sharp transition.

You seem like happy Canon user ;-) I try to avoid third party stuff.

I thinking about a switch also, both Canon and Nikon have some great lenses, but the line up is a bit different from another, and then we have third party lenses also. So things will depend on ...

Good to know, not sure how much the AF have been improved in the 6D ii, but perhaps it's better than in the D800 I sold.  For action (tele) photo I currently use D500 but I really don't like to ...

Now you got me....gotta get out more, take more pictures...I know...sorry...:-( But it's a another rainy day...:-)

Not many but perhaps some lenses. Look at dxomark lens tests. You never seem to get close to what the sensor might resolve above 30MP, or? I think you would have to go to medium format to get a ...

Ok, interesting, I have noticed that also, to an extent at least. Even seen people going to MFT...and Fuji X. MF would be nice but not an option, since I want to be able to shoot longer telephoto ...

I use comp mode!, also low light mode for ISO comparison. Nikons look soft, only nikons without AA filter looks as good as the 6d mk ii, D810 for example. But I don't need the amount of pixels in ...

Looks the same on all ISO to me for the D750, D5 and D800 looks soft also, I suspect it's the AA-filters, seem to be waist of pixels. IBIS is definitely a good thing but Sony is not an ...

Ok, thanks for input, didn't know about the tamrons. What I also like  with Canon DSLR:s is the grip. They look quite impressive, perhaps not as compact and light as Canons. D750 grips is not very ...

Seems to be a lot of complaints on the 6D ii IQ. To me it looks better than the highly praised D750. https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-6d-mark-ii-review/6 The D750 with it's strong AA ...