MAubrey

I didn't look it up. I chose 3lbs because its a common small hand weight size.

Arm building with the equivalent of 3lb weights?

Then get one of the 2000x ones instead. It just won't be 1TB.

Not with these IOPS.

It's the second lightest 24mm f/1.4, modern or not and the lightest, if you take into account the requisite adapter to use the lightest one, the Canon FDn 24mm f/1.4, which isn't anywhere near as...

Is 17mm F4 GFX Zero-D really just the 12mm f/2.8 with the 1.4x converter permanently built-in, minus the shift functionality?

@dpreviewblog, I couldn't work if I didn't have at least two bodies, but I can understand why that'd be a stretch if you're only doing photography for yourself.

The ability to have a regular bayer camera with awesome high ISO *and* a foveon camera all within the same system is going to be incredible.

I have to say: I like the fact that they designed the adapter to look like part of the camera rather than part of the lens.

Given that Mitakon can make a 50mm f/.95 lens on Sony's quite small mount, I don't see why it wouldn't be feasible.

Here. This is free.
http://astrojargon.net/EOSInfo.aspx?

Hiring is developers is hard right now. Currently there are more companies looking for developers than there are developers available.

If it's in the tradition of the other Voigtlander APO close focus telephotos (125 & 180), it'll be worth the price.

Lot's of phones.

2,895g on the official page.

https://www.sony.com/electronics/camera-lenses/sel400f28gm#product_details_default

I'd say that the 14mm f/1.8 looks absurdly large on the Sony, but having held it in person, I know for a fact it looks absurdly large on any camera.

Meyer's gotta have made an error, saying 72 instead of 82?

Maybe.

Maybe not.

We'd need a test that either doesn't use a lens at all or a test that uses a lens that can resolve hundreds of lp/pm.

There's a large thread on fredmiranda.com testing 35mm lenses to see what works. Other than the 28mm, the Otuses are killers and many of the Sigma Art lenses look incredible, too.

You realize, ecka84, that 200mm on μ43 has the angle of view of 400mm, not 300mm, yes?