Joined on Jun 29, 2016


Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5
In reply to:

Urbex Mark: $2500 for a camera without a top display? Come on.

That was a good one! :)
Maybe if I could see it I'd use it. I need glasses for close up stuff but never take them with me when I go out and I never use it cuz I can't see it.

I use the buttons that associate with it all the time though, maybe that makes me semi-pro :p

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2020 at 14:54 UTC
In reply to:

Urbex Mark: $2500 for a camera without a top display? Come on.

People still use the top display?

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2020 at 14:15 UTC
On article Film vs Digital: Fashion photography shootout (404 comments in total)
In reply to:

rev32: What did the photographers say or do to that poor girl?

She's aweful

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2018 at 00:02 UTC

Labor can be cheap cheap cheap depending on where it's made.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 00:21 UTC as 39th comment
In reply to:

Fazal Majid: Being made of 52 or 64 individual pieces is a bug, not a feature, as it compromises strength, and is usually a corner cut on cheap leather goods. A single piece of contiguous leather is more expensive than smaller scraps sewn together, but the single-piece construction is far more solid.

In other words, this is a piece of junk that is trying to spin low quality into a benefit with hipster marketing.

Someone in the accounting team figured out a good way to make money off what they would usually throw away.

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2018 at 21:01 UTC
Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5