Toni Salmonelli

I would wish for that too, but such a bright lens on a 1" sensor would probably be way to big for a phone.

Yes, you might be right. When asked in interviews regarding Fuji X mount Sigma reps. beat around the bush for quite some time now.

Well, we'll see. I had several Sigma lenses back in the Canon days and really liked them. But if there won't be any Sigma X-mount lenses my world won't collapse.

Nice! This lens could succeed my trusted Fuji 18-50 in the future once it's released in X-mount (as is already rumoured).

Good for you.

@ Jacques: But what if I already get the "predictable effect and the potential beauty" with my current camera? ;-)

I wonder if my current camera will be my last.

Do I understand it right, that most of the sensor area is wasted as two separate circular images are projected side by side on the sensor?

@ Armandino: Although I respect Elon Musk for his bold entrepreneurship and despite his great track record I would not believe everything he says. Making space travel accessible for the average has...

'Inspiration4 is the realization of a lifelong dream and a step toward a future in which anyone [who is stinking rich] can venture out and explore the stars'

@ User1234567890: That's why I would happily trade a shorter focal length in for a bigger sensor.

@ TwoMeteBill: AndroidOne should be the ideal Android version for you, because AndroidOne is simply Android without any third party add-ons resp. alterations of the OS and without bloatware. So...

Just curious. Am I the only one who had rather seen a 50mm equivalent lens with the "big" sensor of the main module instead of this 70mm tele setup. As around 80-90% of my pictures are taken with a...

The X100V could be an alternative. Albeit with a fixed lens + converters.

Hi Rishi, do you know which RAW converters support Apple's ProRaw and Google's Raw?

Question: Does the color filter array actually change when pixels are combined as shown in the illustration. I highly doubt it.

I'm no expert in physics, but with a pixel size of 0.64 μm, the size of this sensors pixel is (at least in part) smaller as the wavelength of visible light which is between 0,38 and 0,78 μm. So...

Exactly my thought.The next versione is just around the corner so this buy one and get one free scheme is quite a stretch. :-)

Shallow Depth of field is completely overrated and it wears off fast. I fell for it to in the beginning and lusted for fast lenses which could deliver it. Now when I look through older images, I...

Thanks for the clarification. :-)