Toni Salmonelli

Well, they first had to learn their lesson first (Nikon 1) ;-)

oysso: Ok, thought ETTR means always to expose as bright as possible without clipping highlights.

Maybe we have a different understanding of ETRR. I do try to "lean" my tone curve to the right, but I don't go all the way to the right which would be ETTR but leave a little room. So when I am...

"That’s not the best way to expose digital. The best results are achieved by giving as much exposure as possible without clipping the brightest tones you care about: a process called ‘exposing to...

Yeah, totally over the top. :-)

@ James: The XH-1 indeed has the best ergonomics of any Fuji camera but it is also bigger than any other Fuji camera. What I meant is that there is room for improving the ergonomics auf Fuji...

As much I love Fuji design I'd wish Fuji would sacrifice design a bit for better handling (e.g. bigger hand grips and better positioning of the shutter buttons). Even if it may not be the best...

The question was, what users want from a mirrorless camera ;-)

I could be viewed like this, but one could also see it from another point of view. In this case, assuming that one already has made up ones mind about buying into an APS-C system and wanting to now...

Indeed, I think "entry level" in this case more or less refers on the price.

The Sony 6300 is also about 200 EURO more expansive than the EOS M50 and the X-T100 and therefore not "entry level".

Oh c'mon. Starting such a countdown just a few days after the development announcement is just to much marketing mumbo-jumbo for my taste.

@ Mick: I know. Canon also uses the term pixel for their Dual Pixel AF. I guess over time the terminology changed.

Anyhow, you'll probably find a thousand links of reputable sources using it...

@ mick: Marketing reps. do put all kind of crap in their press releases all the time. A press release is no benchmark for scientific accuracy.

Thanks die the pictures. The flange distance looks quite big (as far as one can tell just from the thickness of the body which admittedly does not tell much). May they keep the existing DSLR-mount...

Well that would be a very very risky plan indeed.

@ camera conspiracies: It codes pretty close, But that doesn't mean, that it is not more expensive to build a good lens with that extra mm.

E.g. The Canon 11-24 4.0 costs several time as much as...

So true

This lens is a 12-24 equivalent. Therefore it is not really comparable to a 16-35 FF lens.

Maybe it is a stellar performer and therefore "worth" the price. Anyhow, I have a hard time imagining that Fuji is selling a lot of these lenses at this price.