Hasa

Hi there! Although everybody emphasizing increased pixel size = reduced noise being of course right.... if you factor in Topaz denoise you will be able to easily reach Z5 noise levels, provided the ...

This is odd, but maybe some of the advanced settings on the most expensive Nikon flash can be used? https://photographylife.com/how-to-make-autofocus-work-in-extremely-low-light Focus shifting can ...

Nope. You cannot compare a low-pixel count sensor to a high pixel count sensor both at 100%. It is like comparing apples and oranges. Experts on the web have done the comparisons between high and ...

I have never seen that problem with my Z7. What a surprise! After buying Topaz plugins I never, ever use any sharpening or denoise in LR or PS. Just Topaz. "Default settings" don't mean much to me. ...

Great lens the Tamron 35-150mm F2.8 - 4 and when shooting fully open and images seem slightly soft then it sharpens up nicely in Topaz denoise. Nikon is never going to make such a zoom range, so I ...

We spent one night, but we are going back in a moths time to this gem of a coastal resort. The hotel is from 1908 and was built to attract tourists from Britain who would play golf in the dunes ...

I asked my Uncle and this is what he said: https://topazlabs.com/lens-effects/ref/49/

For general travel I need my wife to be separated from the background - hence around 50mm for APS-C or 70mm + for FF is ideal. When FF'ers really NEED wider DOF and insist - then they use focus ...

https://topten.ai/image-upscalers-review/

@Fixx - I don't see google as a service on the web yet. One site hails vanceai.com as the best online upscaler and the free version allows 3 images of max 2.8 Mp /month. https://vanceai.com/pricing/

It depends whether you want to emulate a real lens with shallow field of view and beautiful bokeh or not. You are the master of your images and can do as you please. That is up to you to decide. I ...

Piximperfect allows us to have our own preferences, so in your case you just need to see less than half his video, or even less. The main problem is subject isolation and he has a wonderful ...

No it was not you and they were not beat up. It is quite obvious, that they have engaged in a mud-slinging contest. Nope. No distortion on my image of the flowers = A very successful 2x uprez not ...

Well, the worrying thing is that in the future Google will compute "I recognize Mr. Flint and according to his dental records he should now be missing a front tooth, so I will use teeth from a...

To me the only valid test is taking a low-rez image with e.g. a camera like my old Canon powershot 3.2 Megapixel and compare to an image of the same, format-filling subject taken with a 40 + Mpixel...

I can make quite nice uprez from x2 linear from 10 Mpix with a great lens to 40 Mpix. I have also "saved" portraits of family that were slightly out of focus. I routinely sharpen up eyes and...

In some of these tests, that I have previously seen others make, they construct the low-rez image by down-sampling a high rez image. It is most probably not the same as starting out with a true...

Exactly! And any photographer-brain should be better quality than AI, although perhaps slower :-) Piximperfect has an instruction video. You need to decide yourself what is subject and/or focal ...

Get over it! No decent digital camera from after 2005 when I bought my Sony R1, would produce such a lousy starting point. If you find Topaz does nasty things to a detail of an image, you simply ...

Sure, not blaming you :-) Right, I totally agree! I took an image from my 10 Mpix Sony R1 (APS-C from 2005, 24-120mm equiv. zoom) of a bouquet of flowers where a young woman with a small child lost ...