RDoe

I have noticed that with the 10-24 and 18-55, but it is very hard to reproduce. So one time it's there, the other it's not. Maybe it is user error, I do not know. I'm now trying out the IS2 mode ...

AGREED! I have noticed this also. Although it still depends on factors. I saw that with sharper fixed focal length lenses the problem looked less severe. But as it stands now, my last edits with ...

Ever since I have a serious telephoto lens I wanted to try bird photography. This is now a couple of years, but I really never got into it, or at least tried it. Now having more experience with ...

NOTE: if its a framing grid, then see below. I have that too, seems to be more clearly with certain pictures, due to sharpening or moire-sort-off-phenomenon. Do not know if its fault or supposed to ...

Ok, it has been said before. But I have no issues with focussing and the 18-55. The 56 I do not longer have and could sometimes hunt. However you really need to update the firmware of the camera ...

Oké I admit I'm a sucker for detail and sharpness, still looking if I want to return to Sony. However Fuji is the system for everything at the moment for me. Sony still lacks good television ...

One thought, is it mentioned anywhere that this lens is a rectilinear wide angle zoom? Why could this not be a diagonal fish-eye zoom? Could be, I would be interested, unless price will go past 800e.

Take a look at this article. I use Nik and it does a great job. Remember to set sharpening and noise reduction to 0 before sharpen and apply if needed noise reduction afterwards. http://www.fujixpa ...

True! And if you can choose. I would go with the m43 version. That one is tiny and much sharper than the Fuji variant, from my experience.

I depends on weather, lights, clear skies etc. The 16mm is perfect I guess but the 18-55 will do also. Keep shutter speed around 15-20s. I do not want the stars to trail, so thats why I keep an ...

Maybe try a international reseller from Japan or Hong Kong. Probably more than enough to find on Ebay?

Recent photos with the X-T2, 1024 and Haida

I use a 72mm slim filter on the 10-24mm. It works great and doesn't touch the front element. I never liked BW due to the brownish color cast. I had that one as well before investing in Lee big stopper.

I use haida filters. Stepped away from Lee, I couldn't believe it myself, but these haida filters are just as sharp, less color cast and much cheaper. No vignet at 10mm. https://www.amazon.de/gp/pr ...

How do you obtain that specific sharpness? I do not seem to be able to produce these kind of results, or al they all shot with primes only?

Would you trade the 16-55 for the 23? I have just purchased the 16-55 but it is oke, but not blown away by it. It seems I have an exceptional copy of the 18-55. Anyway re-think my prime strategy ...

I use this -or- take a look at this article. http://www.fujixpassion.com/2016/04/14/how-to-edit-and-apply-sharpen-to-pictures-from-fuji-x-t1-in-the-lightroom/

Really..? Oke I guess technically you are right, but it is a batterygrip.. so it sort of implies.

Google is your friend: http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_t2/features/page_06.html

Hi, you are totally right! I was not convinced on X-T1 files and raws. But Lightroom improved with the last versions, not ideal but improvement is there. The X-T2 is a step forward in this case ...