BinHereBe4

@Rensol
"I have PhD in physics and looks like know more about optics then you do"
PhD in physics but does not know the difference between then and than
Do you also spell photos as photo's in plural?

you have to be real stupid to believe this bs

@strados He does not have an answer and you don't really believe we live on spinning ball ;)

@ PostModernBloke
Why don't you prove it's real. You have evidence to prove it's real?

What a sloppy Photoshop job!

I just saw a pig fly by my window with Nikon P1000. I swear I am not making it up. :D

bs
you can't land on any of celestial bodies above us because NONE are terra firma

1cm minimum focus distance (at wide-angle)
Isn't that measured from sensor?
If so, how is that possible with foot long lens? :D

@Mathieu18 Did you have camera with you? You took pictures of what you saw? Of course you did lol

@Barty L Ok let's say planes did cut through the towers, but you still believe Arabs did it. Right? If you buy that you will buy any bs mainstream media throws at you.

I am sure you all went to university and studied physics lol

lol keep watching CNN sheeple

@Holger Take a guess

@Mathieu18 You don't understand much of anything, do you?

Imagine that! Such a tiny drone breaks though the mighty aircraft wings that cut through World Trade Centre towers with such ease.

YAAAWN

It seems most people don't get this.
"The GX9 is entirely consistent with the GX7. It's the GX8 that was the anomaly, not this newer model."

Absolutely correct, GX8 was THE ANOMALY.

33 minutes flight time? Really? lol
magical number ;)

500 MB SSD? Ah yes, those made in 1990. lol

Are you saying DR is better in GX9 than in GX7? If so please have your eyes examined.