Reading mode: Light Dark
landscaper1

landscaper1

Lives in United States Alexandria, United States
Works as a Property Manager
Joined on Oct 8, 2004

Comments

Total: 46, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

PanoMax: Those who need booze to expound their photography experience are seriously lacking something.

The truth is, for a lot of photographers, it's been a lonnng time since they've spent any time in a chemical darkroom. As a result, the results of their re-acquaintance with the process is likely to lead them to conclude they need a drink ... if not the whole bottle. :^)

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2016 at 02:36 UTC
In reply to:

maxnimo: Don't be sad - these new Pyrex cups are junk compared to those from the 1980's. The old ones were way better designed and manufactured, and they are now priceless because you simply can't get them anymore.

It appears the borosilicate ones carry the name "PYREX" in all caps, while the soda-lime-silicate variety is required to be labeled "pyrex" in lower case only.

Oh, and for the record, an 8 cup (similar to that used in the video) original PYREX is worth between $15 & $25. Not worth the effort to even try to sell it.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2016 at 21:41 UTC
In reply to:

maxnimo: Don't be sad - these new Pyrex cups are junk compared to those from the 1980's. The old ones were way better designed and manufactured, and they are now priceless because you simply can't get them anymore.

Priceless? Really??? 'Cause I got one.
Where can I sell it? How much will it fetch?
Sigma 50/1.4 Art lens, here I come.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2016 at 15:35 UTC

I'm surprised no one has groused about the mindless destruction of a perfectly good Pyrex measuring jar.

Granted, it's not a camera or a lens, but I'm sure there must be a few broken-hearted cooks out there.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2016 at 06:38 UTC as 19th comment
In reply to:

Lee Saxon: Lord, are we now calling not-quite-6x4.5 "full frame medium format" because of the 33x44 sensor? So obnoxious and misleading. If we've got to call a medium format full frame I'd say it ought to be 6x6. Maybe 6x7, but that's starting to get into the "specialty camera" territory (which 6x9 and larger definitely is). If it turns out these lenses don't cover full 6x4.5 I'm going to roll my eyes pretty hard.

Teila, it's not a matter of "letting go." It's unrealistic to expect photographers to simply overlook more than a century of film format sizes and proportions in order to adopt new standards for relatively new digital systems. More to the point, if dpreview is going to use the 35mm film format (24x36mm) as the basis for deciding whether a digital sensor is "full format," then consistency demands that it apply the same criteria in describing medium format digital sensors.

Link | Posted on Jul 18, 2016 at 23:03 UTC
In reply to:

landscaper1: No word yet on whether the photographer has begun to glow in the dark. Once that happens, your days of shooting film are truly over.

QuarterToDoom, my original comment was "tongue-in-cheek." Let me know if I need to explain that one to you.

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2016 at 07:17 UTC

No word yet on whether the photographer has begun to glow in the dark. Once that happens, your days of shooting film are truly over.

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2016 at 21:32 UTC as 24th comment | 2 replies

The film is, without question, one of the best demonstrations of the air movement forces that can create tornadoes. IMPRESSIVE!
On the other hand, 20,000 miles in 18 days seems a little difficult to believe. That works out to about 16 hours of driving at 70mph per day. Between eating, sleeping, personal hygiene, and, to say the least (?), time required to set up your camera and allow the time to elapse for those incredible images, I have to wonder if that 20,000 miles number is a wee bit exaggerated. :-)

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2016 at 07:28 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Dave C 150: ....... and what if Michaelangelo had thought that composition would be a more pleasing image? Photography is an art and as long as the attempt isn't to mislead I don't have a problem.

No, I would not classify that NatGeo cover as "photojournalism" if any significant element of the final image was inserted or modified in a way that a serious photo-tourist taking his own photo at the same time and from the same location couldn't duplicate.

I will concede that, for editorial reasons, a photojournalistic magazine COULD produce an altered cover (since magazine covers are designed to attract potential readers), but ONLY if that magazine made it very clear that the cover was a contrived image.

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2016 at 09:24 UTC
On article Under pressure: Canon vs. Nikon in a hydraulic press (295 comments in total)
In reply to:

shinan: this is what japanese call 暇すぎる.

I'd comment on this ... if only I knew for certain what 暇すぎる is.

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 00:39 UTC
On article Under pressure: Canon vs. Nikon in a hydraulic press (295 comments in total)
In reply to:

morepix: But why? This adds zero useful content to the site.

In contrast to your comment, perhaps?

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 22:09 UTC
On article Under pressure: Canon vs. Nikon in a hydraulic press (295 comments in total)
In reply to:

Balooziggy: Please can someone put DPR under that press, crap like this is not news or even worthy of being reported on. If the DPR staff need amusement maybe they should treat themselves to a comedy show or something that appeals to their childish BS.

And thank you, Barney, for your efforts.
We've got entirely too many people in these forums who seem way too serious for their own good ... or anyone else'.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 22:03 UTC
On article Under pressure: Canon vs. Nikon in a hydraulic press (295 comments in total)

Dare accepted, and won. And that is my nomination for the world's most collapsible lens.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 09:31 UTC as 72nd comment
On article Under pressure: Canon vs. Nikon in a hydraulic press (295 comments in total)
In reply to:

Balooziggy: Please can someone put DPR under that press, crap like this is not news or even worthy of being reported on. If the DPR staff need amusement maybe they should treat themselves to a comedy show or something that appeals to their childish BS.

Oh, fer pete's sake, lighten up and have a laugh or two. Doctors say it's good for you.

And BTW, who the heck is "pete" and why is it always for his sake???

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 09:29 UTC
In reply to:

Dave C 150: ....... and what if Michaelangelo had thought that composition would be a more pleasing image? Photography is an art and as long as the attempt isn't to mislead I don't have a problem.

Not all photography is "artistic" in the sense that the photographer can take more than a little license with the original image in an effort to inspire a particular emotional response in the viewer. Photojournalism is held to stricter standards, as it should be, if we are to be able to trust in the factual content of photojournalistic images.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 03:35 UTC

Just the thing ... for those with more money than they would otherwise know how to make productive use.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2016 at 20:29 UTC as 59th comment
In reply to:

damian5000: Thanks Google. Don't listen to a bunch of cynical, whining ninnies.

Would that include those asking, "What about Win10 compatibility?"

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 05:30 UTC
On challenge Jump jet (3 comments in total)

I guess each person decides his own criteria.

Link | Posted on Mar 12, 2016 at 13:56 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

sh10453: It would be very useful if DPR would follow up with a report comparing the cost of printing using these printers vs. printing at professional printing services.

The price of ink (regardless of manufacturer) is ridiculously high, and buying cheap refill ink is not a desirable option for quality prints.

I've got an Epson 7800 (24"). No cats, and my apartment does a pretty fair job of maintaining temp, although humidity can diminish in the winter because of electric heating. Nonetheless, I had occasion to leave the 7800 idle for about 10 months, after which all I had to do was run a nozzle cleaning, and it was good to go.

By the way, I bought this baby used for $600. (all smiles)

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2016 at 18:54 UTC
On challenge Jump jet (3 comments in total)

Too bad. I was hoping to see a lot more entries, especially of actual in-flight images. These are truly remarkable aircraft. To think that, as a child, I saw pictures of some of the then current earliest attempts at VTOL combat aircraft (Convair VFX-1 & VFY-1) that didn't make it.

Kudos to the Brits for finally making it a reality.

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2016 at 19:28 UTC as 3rd comment
Total: 46, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »