Lives in Latvia Latvia
Joined on Aug 5, 2011


Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Jordan Stead: Hands down, the ShapeShifter is best backpack for visual producers out there. Simply won't quit - even after years of reckless abuse - and the customer service is top-notch.

What kind of customer service for a backpack have you used?

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2016 at 06:27 UTC
On article Photographing fireworks: The basics and then some (67 comments in total)
In reply to:

ovatab: + set focus manually to hyperfocal distance

Set to infinity not hyperfocal.

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2016 at 17:53 UTC
In reply to:

chadnchady: Let's don't fool ourselves here. If you're a fan of cameras and photography, you'll appreciate Leica. You might not agree with (or be able to pay for) the price, but if somebody gave you a Leica to own, you are lying if you tell me you won't want one. If the SL system was some 50% more for the equivilent canikon/sony system, I would easily pull the trigger. But at 3x the price, sorry leica, i'm not rich enough.

Are you kidding? M-lenses large? Compared to what?

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 09:15 UTC
In reply to:

Arkienkeli: Quick comparison:

Leica SL with 24-90 (f/2.8-4) and this 90-280 zoom: total price about $18800 and weight 3.84 kg

Fujifilm X-T1 with 16-55mm (f/2.8 all the way) and 50-200mm zooms: $2500 and 1.68 kg.

Short zoom is faster on Fuji, longer slower. Resolutions now 24 and 16 MPix, but 24 MPix X-T2 coming soon. So basically one is paying 7.5 times more to carry 2.3 times more weight for basically same IQ.

>Fujifilm X-T1 with 16-55mm (f/2.8 all the way)
> Short zoom is faster on Fuji

Wrong. Crop-sensor 16-55 f/2,8 becomes equivalent to 24-82 f/4 on FF and thats slower compared to Leica f/2,8-4

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 09:12 UTC

It should be mandatory to indicate flash GN for 35 or 50mm (FF equiv.) focal length coverage.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 05:39 UTC as 15th comment
In reply to:

Mike FL: Here we go "200mm that the quoted GN60m@100 ISO", 200mm.

Yes, and GN at 50mm (in FF terms) is ... 1/4 of 60 ???

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 05:31 UTC
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1141 comments in total)
In reply to:

Everlast66: I think Pentax should complain and get Leica to change the name, the same way 40 years ago Leica complained and made Olympus change their mount to OM-1, they were initially going to call it M-1.

How hypocritical by Leica, with their history of protecting their mount naming, but now using Pentax's Q mount naming.

This is NOT interchangable lens camera and Leica Q is camera not mount name.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 15:39 UTC
In reply to:

pdelux: Looks like a Panasonic Lens... who copied who?

mais51, what's wrong with Eastern European assembly labours?

Link | Posted on May 28, 2015 at 07:56 UTC
On article Opinion: Bring on the 70-200mm equivalents (347 comments in total)

Pentax smc DA* 50-135mm F2.8 ED (IF) SDM
Weight 685 g (1.51 lb)
Diameter 77 mm (3.03″)
Length 136 mm (5.35″)
Sealing Yes
Colour Black
Zoom method Rotary (internal)
Filter thread 67 mm
Hood supplied Yes
Tripod collar No

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2014 at 17:39 UTC as 83rd comment | 1 reply

DP, why do you write "which covers an effective focal length range of 210-600mm" using "effective" instead of "equivalent"?

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 12:43 UTC as 14th comment | 4 replies
On article Fujifilm announces weather-resistant XF 50-140mm F2.8 (226 comments in total)
In reply to:

Just another Canon shooter: Fuji (76-213/4.2 eq): 995g
Canon 70-200/4 IS: 760g
Nikon 70-200/4 VR: 860g
Sony 70-200/4 OS: 840g

Pentax smc DA* 50-135mm F2.8 ED (IF) SDM: 685g

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2014 at 17:56 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 Review (651 comments in total)

"But nothing else offers the same balance of size, autofocus, and interchangeable lenses." - how about Pentax Q7?

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 05:28 UTC as 126th comment
On article 2014-15 Waterproof Camera Roundup (255 comments in total)

Dear DPReview, please add to overview table information about image stabilisation (YES/NO, lens/sensor based). That could be valuable.

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2014 at 14:29 UTC as 67th comment

It's another way to collect data of trackable and identifiable gear usage. I suppose that information to some organisations or companies have very high value. Even if no data about actual people are reported to anyone, there are very interesting and valuable analytical decisions available.

Link | Posted on May 22, 2014 at 06:49 UTC as 1st comment
On article Photographing bubbles, one bubble at a time (74 comments in total)

Really nice!

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2014 at 07:34 UTC as 51st comment
On article Review: Ona Lima camera strap (148 comments in total)

Seems more like masked fuji ad.

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2014 at 07:19 UTC as 71st comment
On photo "Little Mushroom Picker" in the I'm in the forest challenge (4 comments in total)

Thank you all for your appreciation.
Great, I agree, I sometimes have a hard time deciding how much sharpening to apply.

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2014 at 08:27 UTC as 1st comment
On article Best Camera of 2012: And the Winner is... (1414 comments in total)

Sorry dpreview, it isn't USER poll for Best Camera of 2012.

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2013 at 12:58 UTC as 373rd comment | 1 reply
On article Best Camera of 2012: And the Winner is... (1414 comments in total)

Sorry dpreview, it isn't user poll for Best Camera of 2012.

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2013 at 12:58 UTC as 374th comment
On article Dpreview Users' Poll: Best Camera of 2012? (1507 comments in total)

DPreview, please add Pentax K-5 II (K-5 IIs) - this camera is announced this year, and many pentaxians prefer it (and also the old K-5) over the K-30.
And "s" version is quite unique and deserves to be highlighted among the other APS-C cameras.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2012 at 08:31 UTC as 522nd comment
Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »