Le Kilt

Lives in France South-West, France
Works as a Searching for Light
Joined on Mar 28, 2005

Comments

Total: 474, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Apple... LOL !

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2016 at 23:44 UTC as 273rd comment
On photo Brig Pilgrim-6641 in the Random Items - Challenge 27 challenge (10 comments in total)
In reply to:

By standing on the Shoulders of Giants: The halo is too strong. It looks like a vignette.

Same here, the effect is too strong for me, it distracts from the ship. But maybe non-photographers won't look at it like that ;-)

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2016 at 10:48 UTC

No mention of F-Stop’s CEO's name...?

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2016 at 20:44 UTC as 51st comment | 2 replies
On article Under pressure: Canon vs. Nikon in a hydraulic press (287 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sam Santana: nice pancake tele-zoom

Lol, and there I was hoping for some more Canon pancake lenses, now we have the technique :-)

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2016 at 09:17 UTC
In reply to:

BadScience: ipads, iphones, cameras with lcd screens....are a complete nuisance at gigs and the anti-social muppets who wave their distracting gadgets in the air should be shot.

Not escorted, shot dead, but at the back of the hall so as not to get in the way.

Link | Posted on Jul 5, 2016 at 19:09 UTC
In reply to:

Le Kilt: What's Apple ?

Do they make anything useful?

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2016 at 08:31 UTC

What's Apple ?

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2016 at 17:46 UTC as 56th comment | 5 replies

Panasonic : can we have the serial number printed on again under warranty?
;-)

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2015 at 08:06 UTC as 28th comment
In reply to:

Torsten Hoff: >> as long as you retain proof of purchase and the label from the camera box that states the serial number.

So if the camera was a gift or you already threw out the box, you're screwed? Sorry Panasonic, not good enough.

Simple, if you have proof of purchase, Panasonic should be honouring first year warranty without considering serial numbers, as is done with many machines. Any other attitude would be illegal.

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2015 at 08:00 UTC

Who's Taylor Swift?

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2015 at 11:56 UTC as 41st comment | 3 replies
On article Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? (1071 comments in total)

Now if we can just have an SLR version of this camera...!

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2015 at 21:24 UTC as 54th comment | 1 reply
On article Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? (1071 comments in total)
In reply to:

Roadrunnerdeluxe: Not what I would usually shoot myself, but the tulip photo is gorgeous!!

Too artificial for me.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2015 at 21:24 UTC
In reply to:

Le Kilt: Gosh, remember, all compacts cameras are mirrorless. Now some have interchangeable lenses. And some are getting great sensors. Convergence ? The question is do you want TTL optical viewfinder, even if it means more bulk. All the rest is... yawn...

P.S. Please Sony, bring out an SLR version of the Sony A7RII AF compatible with Canon lenses!

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 22:48 UTC
In reply to:

Le Kilt: Gosh, remember, all compacts cameras are mirrorless. Now some have interchangeable lenses. And some are getting great sensors. Convergence ? The question is do you want TTL optical viewfinder, even if it means more bulk. All the rest is... yawn...

Hi Richard,
Sorry, I was probably being a bit rude ;-) and the naming of the MILCs was indeed a problem (I remember the survey here for a sensible name!).
I suppose to me (shooting mostly with Canon DSLRs) the viewfinder remains a very important aspect, at least with an SLR you know you've got one, with half the MILCs you don't, so I wouldn't put them in the same basket, but that's me... :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 22:20 UTC

Gosh, remember, all compacts cameras are mirrorless. Now some have interchangeable lenses. And some are getting great sensors. Convergence ? The question is do you want TTL optical viewfinder, even if it means more bulk. All the rest is... yawn...

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 21:37 UTC as 115th comment | 4 replies
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Review (866 comments in total)

Good camera.

Very disappointed not to see an intervalometer included in the firmware.

Interesting smartphone type apps feature - you connect the camera directly to the internet using its Wifi, then (using a PlayMemories account you've set up) you can see and download new apps to the camera.
Not many yet, but a handfull of free ones.

BUT 9.99 € for an intervalometer app (albeit a good one), I feel a bit ripped off.

Sony :
- Please add the option not to turn the camera off when pushing the viewfinder back down.
- Please include an intervalometer in the firmware, or provide a free one in the apps.

But nice camera.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2015 at 14:30 UTC as 18th comment

How annoying and distracting, the photos scrolling up or down... :-(

Link | Posted on May 31, 2015 at 19:38 UTC as 8th comment
On photo Mesa Arch Sunrise in the Holes in Nature challenge (1 comment in total)

Seems a little HDR over-processed, but a great pic !

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 21:30 UTC as 1st comment
On photo The heart in the Holes in Nature challenge (1 comment in total)

Could do with a little extra width (not easy if you haven't the lens with you!) but a high class photo :-)

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 21:28 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Cenote Rays in the Holes in Nature challenge (2 comments in total)

Excellent !!!

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 21:26 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 474, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »