Gordon7373
Joined on
Jan 12, 2012
|
Comments
 |  |  |  |
| scrum break away by al booth from Sport competition | Parking Deck by Olaf R from Your City - Parking Garage | Communication Tech by alberto_b from Technology | With & without by OBellini from Empty - Full |
Beginner's GuidesGetting Started
In-depth testingLatest Camera Reviews
Beyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videos
real world performanceField Test Videos
see how we seeSample Galleries
In-depth ReviewFujifilm X100F
Show CoverageHits and Misses from CP+ 2017
Throwback ThursdayClassic Cameras from Days Past
2457FeatureWhat is equivalence?
What's that Noise?Shedding some light on the sources of noise
All this fuss over aesthetics! As a retired professional I always (as one should) put aesthetics a long, long way behind form and function, after all a camera is a tool.
Yes, sorry, I do want to make a point here. My career started way back in the analogue days and I truly thought the black body cameras were head and shoulders above the silver ones in looks. But I always bought the silver model. Why? Try reading the dials and navigating the controls of an all black camera in very low light. now try it with a silver camera - chalk and cheese!
JackM: EVF on an SLR is just wrong.
Why, oh why? The camera creates the image electronically, so why the heck wouldn't you want to see it the same way???
The OVF was created and had its place in the analogue era - it is now redundant!
This is not surprising and a perfectly logical thing for Olympus to do. Think about it - Olympus don't have a M43 camera directly competing with Panasonic's GH-2 etc.
This is most likely to be the OM based camera - so almost certainly would be Micro four thirds. Where is the idea that there would be a sensor size change coming from?