RStyga

RStyga

Joined on Nov 8, 2010

Comments

Total: 883, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article Hands on: Sony FE 50mm F1.8 and 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 (137 comments in total)

The 50/1.8 looks large, not to mention the tele zoom; not sure that the mirrorless design helped here.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 04:25 UTC as 9th comment | 7 replies
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1166 comments in total)

A quick glance at the comparative to RX1R II specs invites at least a modest amount of reservation to kick in: Q has nearly half the resolution and sensitivity, a fixed LCD, no flash, 130g more weight, significantly larger volume, and it's $1500 more expensive (street price); not to mention the 'legendary' less know-how (see Conclusion "Cons")..

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2016 at 22:11 UTC as 167th comment

On second thought, I'll buy it if it passes a minimum quality bar: at least 30' of hand-polishing.

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2016 at 22:01 UTC as 26th comment

I think Leica rushed this announcement by a week; it's not April's Fool day yet...

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2016 at 21:57 UTC as 27th comment
In reply to:

maxnimo: Now the real question is - will this lens be able to take a better image of a distant bear than let's say a Canon or a Sony or a Fujinon lens?

The Leica lens is not constant F2.8. I'm pretty sure that the Sigma 100-300 F4, a true gem, is only a fraction of Leica's price.
http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/328-sigma-af-100-300mm-f4-ex-hsm-apo-lab-test-report--review?start=1

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 07:40 UTC
In reply to:

maxnimo: Now the real question is - will this lens be able to take a better image of a distant bear than let's say a Canon or a Sony or a Fujinon lens?

Not necessarily, no. Perhaps a bit but in no way worth the price and size/weight trade off.

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 04:17 UTC

Bargain-size, bargain-price...

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 04:16 UTC as 66th comment
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2485 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jeff Seltzer: I actually own the camera. As a professional photographer, I can say it's my most favorite camera ever owned. The OVF is not a gimmick, and I like to use it in conjunction with the EVF. The camera's handling is great, and images are fantastic. It's more fun and engaging to use than my old Canon DSLRs. It might not win on every objective spec, but the whole is more than the sum of the parts. It's a great camera. Is it "worth" the price? Value is subjective. I think it's worth it.

@darngooddesign - is this certain? I've read a lot of disputes about it, i.e., whether X-Pro2 is free of that problem...

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 00:37 UTC
In reply to:

greypixelz: lame sony lame

do better next time: _listen_ to yr customers!

@radissimo - Don't forget Ricoh is Japanese, too...

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2016 at 07:07 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2485 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jeff Seltzer: I actually own the camera. As a professional photographer, I can say it's my most favorite camera ever owned. The OVF is not a gimmick, and I like to use it in conjunction with the EVF. The camera's handling is great, and images are fantastic. It's more fun and engaging to use than my old Canon DSLRs. It might not win on every objective spec, but the whole is more than the sum of the parts. It's a great camera. Is it "worth" the price? Value is subjective. I think it's worth it.

RAW developer used? Iridient?

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2016 at 05:22 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2485 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jeff Seltzer: I actually own the camera. As a professional photographer, I can say it's my most favorite camera ever owned. The OVF is not a gimmick, and I like to use it in conjunction with the EVF. The camera's handling is great, and images are fantastic. It's more fun and engaging to use than my old Canon DSLRs. It might not win on every objective spec, but the whole is more than the sum of the parts. It's a great camera. Is it "worth" the price? Value is subjective. I think it's worth it.

Have you noticed any 'waxy skin' image output on JPG files?

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2016 at 04:50 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2485 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gazeomon: What I don't get is the omission of an articulated screen on this type of camera at this price point. I think it's otherwise a good camera (although not really great or outstanding) but not being able to easily shoot from the hip or at difficult angles would be a deal breaker for me. Luckily there is a lot of choice out there.

I second that.

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2016 at 04:49 UTC
On article Retro through-and-through: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Review (2485 comments in total)

DPR:
In the spec comparison, you omitted the feature 'weather-sealing', why? Don't you think it's important?

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2016 at 04:48 UTC as 80th comment
In reply to:

RStyga: What a sorry excuse of an update from Sony. As other members indicated, ALL A7 series cameras should have an uncompressed RAW option. Sony, wake up!

Yes, I'm pretty certain. Do you have reasons to think otherwise?

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2016 at 04:15 UTC
In reply to:

greypixelz: lame sony lame

do better next time: _listen_ to yr customers!

Who in their right mind would accuse them of releasing unfinished products?? It's called "improvement", Richard, and "respect for the customer". A FW update always act positively for the company. I don't think any of Ricoh GR's numerous FW updates, for instance, were at any time seen as an indication of 'unfinished product'.

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2016 at 01:58 UTC

What a sorry excuse of an update from Sony. As other members indicated, ALL A7 series cameras should have an uncompressed RAW option. Sony, wake up!

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2016 at 01:54 UTC as 17th comment | 7 replies
On article On assignment: the Leica Q at a Portland wedding (206 comments in total)

The photos are color-oversaturated and harsh; was this intentional? I understand it's a matter of style, but they look dark, harsh and gloomy; not exactly the stuff of weddings. I would not buy the Q based on these photos.

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 01:29 UTC as 8th comment
On challenge Landscape Photo - Urban Challenge (3 comments in total)

Do people vote with eyes closed?

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 00:09 UTC as 1st comment
On article CP+ 2016: Hands-on with new Sigma SD cameras and lenses (313 comments in total)

"We're hoping that the slow, hesitant AF that we experienced is a symptom of these early, pre-production cameras [...]"
I'm afraid it won't be a symptom but a characteristic. At least (and that is very important) by using a CDAF/sensor-based PDAF there will be no more AF accuracy issues that all SD DSLRs were plagued by.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2016 at 02:29 UTC as 30th comment

I wish they could make this a F2.8-4 and without much difference in volume. :-)

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 05:27 UTC as 53rd comment | 18 replies
Total: 883, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »