Klarth

Joined on Oct 14, 2011

Comments

Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article QromaScan uses your smartphone for digitizing prints (45 comments in total)

Seem like these days a lot of people "kickstar" anything just for the sake of it.

Link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 01:13 UTC as 30th comment

Me grabs popcorn

Link | Posted on May 1, 2015 at 02:27 UTC as 134th comment
On article Massive $33,500 2450mm f/8 NASA lens surfaces on eBay (235 comments in total)
In reply to:

chillgreg: I bet Ren Kockwell bought that with his "donations"...

Ken Rockwell doesn't need a telescope to approach the stars. The stars come near to him.

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2015 at 03:50 UTC
In reply to:

steelhead3: HDR merge should be hugely popular with Canon shooters and the limitations of their sensors.

Seems like "steel head" succeeded

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2015 at 02:18 UTC
On article Lensbaby introduces Velvet 56mm f/1.6 (167 comments in total)

"The Most Hipster Portrait Lens Ever Made"

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2015 at 22:39 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies

I think this interview is more realistic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJBq0z2Vmu4

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2015 at 04:53 UTC as 92nd comment

Just one thing to say:

Holy sh...

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2015 at 05:01 UTC as 79th comment

Canonitis

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 04:20 UTC as 253rd comment
On article Opinion: Do we really need the Fuji X30? (319 comments in total)
In reply to:

Simon97: This should be titled, "Do We Really Need Four Articles in One Day on the Fuji X30?".

Really DPR, cut it down to a couple articles.

It's hard to read essentially the same over and over.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 00:12 UTC
On article Hasselblad unveils pixel-shifting 200MP H5D-200c MS (231 comments in total)

Pixel-shifting?

More like "Pixel-shi|tting".

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2014 at 04:52 UTC as 28th comment
On article A look at the Lomography Petzval 85mm F2.2 lens (185 comments in total)

You can get a new Helios 40 85mm F1.5 lens for $420.

Same or better bokeh effect, faster aperture, and less ridiculous and more functional design.

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2014 at 00:55 UTC as 63rd comment
In reply to:

DStudio: It will be interesting to see whether Fuji can elevate this class of lens by better design and manufacturing, like they have with some others.

Hope it happens like the 18-55mm OIS "kit" lens.

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2014 at 06:09 UTC
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (590 comments in total)
In reply to:

nikon power: Carl Zeiss to Sigma is Mercedes to Volkswagen. I'd go for the name, Mercedes, if I got the money.

Thanks, Captain Obvious

Link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 17:47 UTC
On article Samsung NX30 Review (431 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: Just Pay 30% more and get a Fuji xt-1

@BarnET Pointless people

Link | Posted on May 22, 2014 at 02:37 UTC
On article Never lose your lens cap again with HACkxTACK (165 comments in total)

Another useless thing that only hipsters will buy

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 00:21 UTC as 65th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

peevee1: No VR again. For tripod-only photographers.

You have parkinson or really bad pulse

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2014 at 07:09 UTC
On article Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? (257 comments in total)

Excellent, more crap that nobody needs

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2013 at 19:35 UTC as 109th comment
On article Nikon D610 real-world and test scene samples (59 comments in total)
In reply to:

Der Steppenwolf: Here is a D610 review:
It's a D600 with functioning shutter.

There, done.

And more expensive.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 04:05 UTC
In reply to:

Klarth: Why does everyone wants VR on every lens?

Do you have Parkinson's?

That's where technique come in handy

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 05:15 UTC
Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »