Matt Random

Lives in United States CA, United States
Joined on May 29, 2005

Comments

Total: 83, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Does this company have anything outside of a marketing department? This is just an ad for an upcoming Kickstarter. And Kickstarter is just an ad to buy into a product that may or may not become a reality.

I've bought into multiple Kickstarter campaigns and gotten some nice products as a result. However, I'd never buy into a Kickstarter campaign for consumer electronics from an unproven company.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 17:52 UTC as 45th comment | 1 reply
On article Throwback Thursday: the Canon PowerShot G1 (139 comments in total)

I used this one for a number of years and was still able to sell it on ebay afterwards.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 23:29 UTC as 35th comment
In reply to:

RDoe: YO! Adobe! Now go and speedup Lightroom ... you lazy...

@Trundling: I bought it at version 1.0 and it was not slow then.

It has steadily degraded over time. Now it is to the point that I can't use the desktop version for quick culling since there is too much of a lag between photos.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 13:43 UTC
In reply to:

MrScrooge: I can't be the only one who read the title of the video, looked at the preview thumbnail, and thought "damn, that's some commitment to a selfie!"

You are not alone.

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2017 at 23:17 UTC

I like the idea of having the set of images that I am currently working with on every screen. With LR CC I can work on the same images on my desktop, laptop, iPad, phone and even a web browser.

I'm not sure I would need the fully cloud based solution that Adobe is touting with Nimbus. With LR CC I can already sync just the images I want and all my edits are consistent across the screens. I guess the promise of Nimbus is that it is supposed to extend this consistency of edits outside of the LR family.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2017 at 14:38 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

CameraCarl: Unfortunately the new iPad interface makes the image much smaller because side panels now take up 1/3 of the screen space, even when not in editing mode, and can't be shrunk. I really don't need that much space dedicated to telling me what my image file name and information are.... I already know, after all I took the image! I wonder if Adobe ever asks users what we really want? If they had asked me, I would have opted for the largest image size I can get on my screen.

Totally agree about the need for a short tutorial included in the app update. Or at least update the Gesture Shortcuts in the included help. I tried numerous things to go to fullscreen or to hide the panel. The use model of taping the image (once) or the active tab selection icon a second time does make sense now that I know about it. However, I have to say it isn't intuitive enough that I found it on my own.

Regarding rating - you can also use the external keyboard for the iPad Pro. All the usual short cuts are supported - x for reject, p for pick, 0-5 for rating. Another advantage of the external keyboard is that the arrow keys switch photos instantly which is great for comparing similar photos.

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2017 at 15:08 UTC
In reply to:

CameraCarl: Unfortunately the new iPad interface makes the image much smaller because side panels now take up 1/3 of the screen space, even when not in editing mode, and can't be shrunk. I really don't need that much space dedicated to telling me what my image file name and information are.... I already know, after all I took the image! I wonder if Adobe ever asks users what we really want? If they had asked me, I would have opted for the largest image size I can get on my screen.

Anyone figure out how to reject and rate when in fullscreen mode (when not using the external keyboard)? It looks like the nifty flick to rate & reject is now gone. It would be great if that worked in fullscreen mode. It would also be nice if I could tap with 2 fingers in fullscreen mode to cycle the info.

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2017 at 03:42 UTC
In reply to:

mmcfine: Define slow? I've been using LR since version 1 and never felt that it was slow for my needs. Yes, it might take time to add many hi-res raw files but that equals to adding Gigabytes of data from any 'heavy' source. The advantages overshadow the weaknesses of LR for me. There are no flawless applications out there of any kind.
Nonetheless good on Adobe to address performance issues even if it sounds too late for some.

The slow browse is my biggest complaint. I should be able to switch from one photo to the next with no lags.

Link | Posted on Jul 13, 2017 at 15:20 UTC
In reply to:

frosti7: Adobe and performance is not something that goes together,
if you use adobe premiere then expect ridicules rendering times,

the funny part is that years ago, the users have developed graphics card acceleration on their own, i cant comprehand why a single person can implement it and adobe cant

https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1243687

Hardware technology also moves forward. Developers should take the time to revisit or perhaps rewrite algorithms to take advantage of multiple cores, GPU acceleration, native GPU routines, etc. Seems like Adobe takes a half hearted approach to these new technologies since switching them on often slows LR down even more. I think it would benefit Adobe to take a look at some of the key algorithms like quick rendering and scaling and rewrite them from scratch using modern techniques.

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2017 at 15:11 UTC
In reply to:

kaphinga: I just bought Luminar. Here are a few first impressions

What I like:

* Some of the filters are nice in small doses. "Accent" and "Color Contrast", in particular, produced some nice results. They also have a nice array of options for structure, and microcontrast.

* The filters are nicely described, with examples of what each one does.

* The clone stamp tool is nicer than Lightroom's.

* Layer and brush options are nice.

What I don't like:

* When I save a file, it overwrites my original by default. I haven't found any option to save automatically to a different file, as I am accustomed to doing with Lightroom or DXO.

* I haven't found a white balance adjustment yet. Admittedly I was working off a jpeg, not a raw image. Maybe there is a white balance option in the raw converter.

* It runs slowly on my late 2013 Macbook Air with 4 GB of RAM.

Overall Luminar is a keeper. I doubt it will be my everyday workhorse, but it's a nice tool to have available.

White Balance is the Color Temperature filter. It is in the Color group. It is also part of the Essentials workspace.

For me both Save... & Export... are bringing up a dialogue where I can change the filename. I'm not seeing any option to automatically rename based on the original filename which would be useful. I'm running the standalone app. Maybe it works differently for the plugin.

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2017 at 17:46 UTC
On article Grab a free copy of DxO OpticsPro 9 while you can (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

sh10453: In my experience, DXO has the lousiest, least helpful, and most arrogant customer support I have ever encountered.
Besides, this is 2 versions old. Current version is 11

I always end up fixing my issues before DXO does.

The application is flaky. I get a message warning (version 11) saying that my drives aren't configured properly for DxO (external drives). It also refuses to open files sometimes. One example was a RAW where I added some general EXIF. DXO was OK with the file before. It continued to refuse to open it even after I restored the original file. Another example was a TIFF that was produced by DXO itself. Other applications could open it. I didn't report either of these issues since past experience taught me that it is pointless.

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2017 at 16:06 UTC
On article COOPH reveals new leather accessory collection (39 comments in total)

Everyone should check out the website. They have some really innovative products. I like the ability to store a lens cap on my head. And the camera mittens really speak to my inner child who isn't interested in photography.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2017 at 16:15 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

grey pilgrim: Another Ditto on the zero interest in the subscription model. Really interested in the App since I have a iPad Pro and pencil, but I will fight all the way to the end against the subscription model.

I'm actively researching Lightroom alternatives, assuming Adobe is going to forget their "promises" sooner or later about Lightroom continuing to offer a non subscription version.

I did this over the holidays to see about dropping my CC subscription. I settled on On1 Photo RAW. I'm currently using my existing copy of DXO in batch mode for RAW conversion, but plan to go all-in with On1 PR once they support the embedded lens correction profiles. I can use Affinity Photo for the rare task I used to do in PS.

I've been an LR user and regular upgrader since the original beta, but I haven't touched LR since I started using On1 PR.

BTW, I suspect that Adobe has already forgotten their promise. I do not expect to see a LR7.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2017 at 02:06 UTC

I'm admittedly old school, but I just can't get into talking to my devices. I also tend not to be in environments where chatting with my computer or devices would be permissible. I can't imagine an office setting filled with the constant noise of everyone talking to their devices. It's hard enough to concentrate with the occasional person talking on the phone or hallway conversation going on. If I was sitting in my home office talking to PhotoShop I would fully expect that my family would keep closing my door so that I don't disturb them in the next room.

I'm still waiting for my computer to track my eye movement so that it knows which window should have the focus. That is something I could really use!

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2017 at 01:45 UTC as 52nd comment | 5 replies
On article Macphun announces Luminar photo editing app for Mac (38 comments in total)

The lack of a decent organization system in all of these editors is what keeps me using LR more than anything. I spend quite a bit more time culling, rating and keywording images than I do with adjusting the photos. When it comes to adjusting I find that staying in LR is easier than going to something else via a plugin or file exchange method.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2016 at 14:17 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1167 comments in total)

I haven't seen any problems with write speed and I always use RAW + JPEG. Prior to the Q I was using an RX1 and routinely had writes stall the camera.

I haven't had any problems with the continuous AF as of yet. But I have just started using it recently. It does seem like it constantly seeks. However the resultant images have nailed the focus.

I like the touchscreen - a lot. The touch shutter comes in very handy for cases where you need to rapidly focus on different areas of the frame from shot to shot. Touchscreen operation can be subjective so it's a good reason to demo the camera if you are considering it.

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2016 at 23:36 UTC as 156th comment

Won't read some of my Leica Q images for some reason. It does read the copy of the images that I made upon import. Anyone know if DXO has a cache or something that I can clear?

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 04:37 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

Matt Random: Looks like they increased the 'Pro for Sony' price. It was $30 for v8 and is now $50 for v9.

Looks like the upgrade would be $40 USD for me. I had to check it through the 'Capture 1 for Sony' page since the standard Capture 1 page says that the license is ineligible for upgrade.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2015 at 17:04 UTC

Looks like they increased the 'Pro for Sony' price. It was $30 for v8 and is now $50 for v9.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2015 at 01:30 UTC as 21st comment | 15 replies
In reply to:

macr: What I would be interested in knowing, is how many stops of light lost through the filter?

I asked that question and was directed to the transmission charts. I'm not say enough to relate one to the other.

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2015 at 03:40 UTC
Total: 83, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »