Scott Everett

Scott Everett

DPReview Administrator
Lives in United States Seattle, United States
Works as a General Manager, dpreview.com
Has a website at www.dpreview.com
Joined on Aug 10, 2004
About me:

Despite growing up in Rochester, NY, the birthplace of the Brownie and Kodak, Scott didn’t discover photography and cinematography until High School, after which he became hooked on visual arts. After spending most of his 20s paying the bills working in the financial industry as a project manager, Scott moved to Seattle in search of mountains, bodies of water, and greener pastures, eventually joining DPReview in 2011 as a Product Manager, and most recently taking over as General Manager. In his free time, he DJs, is a wannabe chef, and works on a variety of photo and video projects, most recently collaborating with the City of Seattle on a photography installation, and winning an Emmy award for producing a short documentary film. The best place to see his photography is instagram.com/scotteverett and scotteverett.tumblr.com.

Comments

Total: 262, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Joed700: If you look at the credits toward the end, it says it is supported by Sony. I wonder what equipment she actually uses on her own.

Cristina is a Sony Artisan of Imagery, has been for a long time:

http://imagingambassadors.sony.net/network/photographer-category-2/cristina-mittermeier/

http://www.cristinamittermeier.com/about/

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2015 at 04:04 UTC
On article 4K video: What you need to know (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Squire: Article is a bit piggy-ducky-horsey for the DPR audience, in my opinion. But I like the layout.

I dont think the Getting Ready for 4K is accurate, regarding PC/Mac specs. I've been editing 4K for a year or so and unless you are doing lots of channels and layering, a good dual core and 8Gb is plenty. You just need a fairly modern dual core which has more video codec support on-chip...

I think "piggy ducky horsey" is going to be my new saying.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2015 at 18:19 UTC
On article 4K video: What you need to know (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

donutlover: I don't mean to sound aggressive or negative, but this "primer" seems like nothing but a Panasonic advertisement. It LOOKS like an advertisement, and READS like an advertisement. I know (and appreciate) that DPReview has a "sponsored content" disclaimer next to the story, but I'd be interested to know if DPR staff actually wrote this piece. The language is pure ad copy to my eyes; the text sounds like it came from Panasonic.

All criticism is fair game, but all of the content is written by DPR editors, as indicated at the top of the article. It's meant to be an introductory primer for those new to 4K, and so we went around the office and outlined what the key aspects of 4K are for photographers, and then went from there.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2015 at 03:50 UTC
On article 4K video: What you need to know (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

fastlass: Honestly, whenever I rent a movie on amazon I only choose SD, and my screen does 1080. I can tell the difference, but it really doesn't affect my perception of the film. I'd rather spend the extra dollar on some nachos.

I have a 50 inch plasma, and have been watching Walking Dead in SD, and it looks great. #morenachos

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2015 at 02:46 UTC
On article 4K video: What you need to know (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

pierpa: Re the new design: why GREY type on white? Good old BLACK would be more readable.

All considered, I think the new design sucks: it's ugly, less readable, and after forcing myself to read the article nevertheless, my eyes ache.

:)

(no, seriously)

Any feedback is good feedback, sort of. Thanks for sharing!

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2015 at 02:06 UTC
In reply to:

Les Berkley: Very nice interview, but that man cannot be a photographer. He never mentioned "bokeh" or "Eye-Cue".

I liked the joke Les. :)

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2015 at 19:47 UTC
On article Into the woods: Samsung NX500 Field Test (74 comments in total)
In reply to:

forpetessake: This review is 6 months too late. Everybody who was interested in this camera already bought it, tried it, and sent it back.
There are at least two very serious drawbacks that somehow the reviewers missed.
One is the kit 16-50 lens. It's so bad that it can compete with Sony 16-50 for the worst kit lens on the market. Selling 28MP camera with such poor lens is a complete waste of megapixels.
Second, other reviewers noticed, and I verified it myself, is the shutter shock problem with this camera & kit lens. It's pretty bad, people need to be aware of it.
It's also strange that the reviewers praised the low light performance. It's actually pretty unremarkable. There is a blue noise in dark areas, and the resolution goes down the tubes.

The interesting thing about the state of camera technology is that cameras even 5-6 years old still take amazing photos relative to the current offering from most manufacturers. The NX500 is still being sold, and will be a relevant piece of gear for years to come, so we make these videos with that in mind, aiming to show gear being used in real world shooting scenarios.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2015 at 19:11 UTC
On article The great outdoors: Canon EOS 5DS and 5DSR Field Test (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

GiovanniB: Is it just me or do the colors seem ... well ... just not quite right, with candy colors overemphasized and subtle hues seemingly desaturated and brownish?

It's not just you. Our team was in Oregon right at the peak of the wildfires, so there was a general yellow smog in the northwest. We're pushing instagram to release a "Forest Fire" filter, they haven;t responded to our emails yet though.

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2015 at 22:07 UTC
On article 2015 Roundup: Interchangeable Lens Cameras around $500 (276 comments in total)
In reply to:

rrccad: what a weird list.

first they claim that the K-52 doesn't make it on the list because it's MSRP is greater than $500, okay fine..

One could purchase D3300 kit for 400 and change.. but that didn't make it on the list either, neither did the canon T5, SL1, the Sony A58, Pentax K-50..

and the final amusing point is this..

"Note: Cameras in our roundups are broken down by current MSRP in the United States. " according to your amazon.com - the MSRP of the A5100 is $548.00, it's on sale for $378 body only. the X-A2 is also an MSRP over $500..

dpreview is really going downhill.

More like the prices of these cameras are going downhill, which is great for all of us!

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2015 at 00:07 UTC
In reply to:

Bjorn_L: The negative reviews are not (for the most part) "bad people" or "bad comments". They are frank and honest.
I love kids. I love the photos my kids take (3 boys, which have all had their own cameras since they were very young). But their photos like the cute tykes above are generally bad photos which are precious to me as their father. However I am not exploitative nor manipulative to pretend stuff worthy of a refrigerator showcase is worthy of being mentioned on a site like this or in a book, etc.
What the father is doing is, in my opinion, not right. But then youtube is full of equally exploitative people just like him who are also trying to trade their kids "cuteness" for money.
Let kids be kids. If you are going to post about a photographer, post about one who is noteworthy for their skill not their age.

Greg, I think that is a fair assessment. But I think we both can agree a third story might be over-doing it. :) Maybe if the project is funded we can conduct an interview with Aaron and let him speak to the excitement and joy he's experienced getting to bring his first son along with him on assignments.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2015 at 18:43 UTC
In reply to:

Bjorn_L: The negative reviews are not (for the most part) "bad people" or "bad comments". They are frank and honest.
I love kids. I love the photos my kids take (3 boys, which have all had their own cameras since they were very young). But their photos like the cute tykes above are generally bad photos which are precious to me as their father. However I am not exploitative nor manipulative to pretend stuff worthy of a refrigerator showcase is worthy of being mentioned on a site like this or in a book, etc.
What the father is doing is, in my opinion, not right. But then youtube is full of equally exploitative people just like him who are also trying to trade their kids "cuteness" for money.
Let kids be kids. If you are going to post about a photographer, post about one who is noteworthy for their skill not their age.

The problem Joseph is that you are making the mistake of projecting your cynical assumption about what is happening onto the photographer:

"The photographer saw his child taking pictures and hatched a plan to fund a project, as opposed to having a warm fuzzy feeling about spending time with junior."

This is one huge assumption. Fortunately we, Dpreview, have the luxury of interacting with the photographers and manufacturers that we write about. Our role as an editorial site is to exercise judgement and choose to present stories and information to our readers that we find interesting, valuable, etc...

Your assumption that the photographer has "lost all perspective" is perhaps indicative of what you want or choose to see, but it is not rooted in any facts, or understanding of or exposure to the photographer or the project.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2015 at 18:36 UTC
In reply to:

Bjorn_L: The negative reviews are not (for the most part) "bad people" or "bad comments". They are frank and honest.
I love kids. I love the photos my kids take (3 boys, which have all had their own cameras since they were very young). But their photos like the cute tykes above are generally bad photos which are precious to me as their father. However I am not exploitative nor manipulative to pretend stuff worthy of a refrigerator showcase is worthy of being mentioned on a site like this or in a book, etc.
What the father is doing is, in my opinion, not right. But then youtube is full of equally exploitative people just like him who are also trying to trade their kids "cuteness" for money.
Let kids be kids. If you are going to post about a photographer, post about one who is noteworthy for their skill not their age.

I think we just have a practical view of how the photography world works. Increasingly the public at large is not willing to pay for photographs. Freelance photographers like Aaron get this, and they fund projects using methods like Kickstarter. Funding a book project that aims to be widely distributed is no small feet, and so for us at DPR it was never a question of commercialization, it was the reality of working independently and finding funding where there is funding. The project stands on it's own.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2015 at 16:16 UTC
In reply to:

Bjorn_L: The negative reviews are not (for the most part) "bad people" or "bad comments". They are frank and honest.
I love kids. I love the photos my kids take (3 boys, which have all had their own cameras since they were very young). But their photos like the cute tykes above are generally bad photos which are precious to me as their father. However I am not exploitative nor manipulative to pretend stuff worthy of a refrigerator showcase is worthy of being mentioned on a site like this or in a book, etc.
What the father is doing is, in my opinion, not right. But then youtube is full of equally exploitative people just like him who are also trying to trade their kids "cuteness" for money.
Let kids be kids. If you are going to post about a photographer, post about one who is noteworthy for their skill not their age.

Aaron is an accomplished photographer who's chosen career involves him shooting all over the world on a weekly basis. He chose to begin a project that allows him to spend time with his son, and expose his son to something he loves and has made a life out of. His project is not about exploitation, it is about the power of getting creative with your children.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2015 at 03:26 UTC
In reply to:

MikeDPR: I'm seeing only 1080p. Can you guys post 4K version? 4K is a key selling point for these cameras.

I cannot speak to all of the decisions made by the crew, but to give you context, this video came together in less than a week, was shot in a single day, and a final edit turned around only days later. Not a typical window for a full music video + making of video. :) So the decisions re: post, 4k, angles, etc..., included the need to get something done quickly.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2015 at 23:48 UTC
In reply to:

MikeDPR: I'm seeing only 1080p. Can you guys post 4K version? 4K is a key selling point for these cameras.

Hey guys, sorry to report, both of our directors shot in 4k, but in post worked to output in 1080, mostly for workflow efficiency (scaling, reframing shots, color work).

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2015 at 00:15 UTC
In reply to:

MikeDPR: I'm seeing only 1080p. Can you guys post 4K version? 4K is a key selling point for these cameras.

Looking into this now, will report back.

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2015 at 18:49 UTC
On article And the winners are: DPReview Awards 2015 (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

shauravraj: Been in this dpreview forum for a while. But this awards that you guys gave does not sound fair based on some of the cameras I have had opportunity to use. What are the basis for award what factors did you consider? And how much does sponsorship skews your awards?

The editorial team spent weeks deliberating each category, weighing tons of factors we use in our reviews. Given the level of technological knowledge spread across the team, we're confident these awards represent the most accurate assessment of the market at the moment.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2015 at 17:45 UTC
On article Readers' Showcase: Luis dos Santos (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: Yes! I really also recommend you all to look at his web site or at 500px. Much larger images. Makes a much better impact.

I have said it before - and I say it again. It is a pity that dpreview always shows portofolios so small. Sometimes it works and sometimes it do not.

Maybe I am just imagining, but I also think the dpreview portofolio cuts away some bright tones. Maybe it is because it is smaller. Or do they do some kind of destructive compression?

Moreover, there is so much more in his own portofolios. And some I think is even better.

It's a good point though, we aim to make it more clear that you can view the images larger, and we are also working looking into a homepage design that will scale to your browser size.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2015 at 16:36 UTC
On article 01010101 Happy New Year! (2 comments in total)

testing 123

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 17:47 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1275 comments in total)
In reply to:

ThePhilips: 3 articles on DPR's front page - if anything, Leica knows how to make product launches.

Ah, yes, sorry, makes sense now. Hadn't had coffee yet. :)

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 19:41 UTC
Total: 262, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »