Scott Everett

Scott Everett

DPReview Administrator
Lives in United States Seattle, United States
Works as a General Manager, dpreview.com
Has a website at www.dpreview.com
Joined on Aug 10, 2004

Comments

Total: 246, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Apple iPhone X review (378 comments in total)
In reply to:

CaPi: Why now? The next one is already in ramp up

We had to save our allowances to buy one.

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2018 at 16:23 UTC
On article On Assignment with Kylie Mazon and the Canon EOS M6 (131 comments in total)
In reply to:

JimManson57: My opinion as a regular, longstanding DPReview reader: You really should flag sponsored content more clearly, and separate it out from the editorial news feed. If you don't you will lose credibility quickly.

Hey Jim, thanks for being a reader and for the feedback. We're discussing some additional call-outs to make sure nobody misses the distinction.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2018 at 18:36 UTC
On article Have Your Say 2017: the winners (202 comments in total)
In reply to:

b0k3h: tomorrow: A Look Back at our Winner's Choice 2017

must be these new high editorial standards the Publisher promised us

Tomorrow: A look back at our favorite "a look back at..." comments.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2018 at 17:39 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: Best of luck on your new position Scott..... and huge thanks to Simon who inherited an excellent website and improved it in lots of ways. And it would be remiss not to mention Phil, who started it all.

Scott, always remember this... we site members enjoy whining a lot, but we also know there is no better source for complete, accurate and trustworthy information. So don't let the complaining wear you down. We really do appreciate everything you guys and gals do.

I look forward to you improving and enhancing a very valuable resource for us. And most of us really do understand it is a business that must meet business goals to continue to exist.

Thanks Marty, we value the feedback no matter which format it takes!

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 20:32 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

n3eg: "...countless blogs offer up half-baked opinions on new products within minutes of their launch..."

Way to slam your readers, guys.

Definitely was not intended to slam anyone, and apologies if it came off that way, I intended to call attention to the contrast between an opinion and a science-based review, perhaps "half-baked" was a tad negative.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 20:31 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rick Knepper: "Simon Joinson, Barney Britton, and Allison Johnson listen politely as I attempt to explain something."

Their eyes look kind of glazed over. You must have gotten too technical for them. :)

I must have been trying to explain equivalence. ;)

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 19:15 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

rickpoole: I've considered myself an advanced-amateur the majority of my photographic life. When I was considering switching to digital more than a decade ago the first site I found was dpreview. Over the years I've learned a huge amount from the information and reviews provided by dpreview and an even larger amount from the interaction with various forum members who are quite more versed and artistic than I am. Thanks for all the hard and high quality work and most of all creating a place and atmosphere for us to share and learn photographic information and technics. Keep up the great work and here is for an even greater 2018!

Thanks for the kind words Rick, we're glad to be a resource and plan to continue growing and improving wherever we can.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 19:15 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg VdB: Best of luck in your new role, Scott, and happy New Year to the DPR team and readers!

On the topic of lens reviews: I'll be happy to see those, but frankly, to present us with good data, you'd have to test like Roger Cicala does. There are several other sites that offer decent "single lens reviews", but Roger has clearly demonstrated that sample variation is so significant that numbers off a single test unit are almost nonsensical.

We agree Greg, it is the best possible manner in which to get an accurate data set. More to come in that regard. Thanks for the feedback!

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 18:51 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

MShot: Sponsored content = fake news. Advertising. Would a sponsor pay for a negative review? Do they approve the content in advance? Cold it be unbiased?

Just ignore it.

Hi Mshot and RFSIII, we appreciate the feedback. I respectfully disagree that sponsored content has anything to do "fake news", or "standards of American journalism", because ultimately, it is neither news or journalism, it is instead, marketing. The crux of the issue, however, is how marketing is placed in front of the public, and that is where we likely agree. Our goal at DPR is twofold in this regard, we want to make it absolutely clear when any content is sponsored, and we want to try our best to influence manufacturers to create interesting content. The latter, in our opinion, is the light at the end of the advertising tunnel, because ultimately, if marketers are focused on creating great content, and consumers are able to clearly understand the difference between editorial content and sponsored content, this becomes the only potential path towards advertising being in any way beneficial to the consumer.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 18:50 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

Miki Nemeth: I'd vivisit DPR if you had a followers feature. I'd inspire great contributors to write more contents. The more followers a member has the better.

Hi Miki, love this idea. We've tossed around ideas for better showcasing forum posts, photo posts, and in general highlighting some of the great contributions our community make. The challenge is primarily one of web design, finding the right way for the community to engage with each-other. Thanks for the feedback!

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 18:42 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

Smitty1: Please test multiple copies of a lens in your lens reviews. There is enough difference between copies that seeing results for multiple copies would have significant value in a lens review to get an idea of what is a 'good' copy versus what is a 'bad' copy.

Hey Smitty, we'll share more when we can, but all I can say for now is we agree with you. :)

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 18:40 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

davesurrey: ....continued
And lastly please please don’t ever give up the forums. They offer a fantastic collection of Worldwide knowledge and opinion that would be hard to find elsewhere, despite the trolls (you know who you are.)

Good luck in 2018.

Thanks Dave, we couldn't agree more. Our forums, the debates, the helpful advice offered, the culture of learning techniques to get the most out of cameras and photos, it's all the reason we come to work every day, and in the majority of cases, why each of us knew about DPReview in the first place.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 18:39 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

moimoi: It would be nice to stop reviewing cell phones. It actually devalues the whole website rather than stepping up. Cell phones are irrelevant for photographers and there are plenty of sites that offer reviews of cell phones. No need to waste time on those.

Bringing back the lens reviews might be a good idea but then again there are tons of those on the internet so not sure.

I think the big step up would be to bring very good photographers within dpreview so that they can truly test new cameras and greatly improve the quality of the sample photos. This would bring more traffic.

Good luck

I think you have to look at the wider world of photography and photo technology when talking about "what should DPReview review". Ultimately, we are obviously a site that caters more to our frequent visitors, camera and photography enthusiasts, than we do to the larger portion of our traffic (organic search). But we also cannot ignore the latter, and ultimately our goal is to be a valuable resource for anyone interested in learning about cameras of all kinds, of which smartphones are a huge category. We understand many users are not interested in smartphone content, but trust me, there are is more than enough demand for them to warrant their creation (even if the comments are less active). So your feedback is noted, but my advice for now is simply to not click on the articles you aren't interested in.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 18:37 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ergo607: I hope preview plans a extensive test of Lightroom alternatives. Now that would get me interested! And please more lens tests. You date the body of today, but you marry your lenses...

This is a good idea, albeit just a very difficult type of review to create, but definitely noted.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 18:31 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

zzzxtreme: Can you guys randomly pick a vintage lens and review it, maybe once a week or once a month?

If you are volunteering, I'll have Rishi schedule his 2-month training course for lens reviews with you, sound good? :)

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 18:27 UTC
On article A letter from the Publisher (331 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mach Schnell: Is Phil Askey totally out of the picture now?

Phil left the company in 2010.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 18:26 UTC
In reply to:

skanter: The obnoxious, inappropriately loud music was such a turnoff that I turned it off within 1 second, and had no desire to go back with sound muted.

Who vets this stuff?

We didn't vet the music. But I think if we had Brian Eno in there, you likely would have loved it.

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2017 at 00:27 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV sample gallery updated (174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Murphster: What is going on in photo #7? I can't quite figure out what I am looking at.

That would be a water fountain. :)

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2017 at 18:37 UTC
On article Live coverage of the Google Pixel 2 launch on DPReview (38 comments in total)
In reply to:

MrImprovement: Google has lost all trust from me, after their un-personing (deletion of all Google accounts including Gmail and Google photos) of people they don't politically agree with and their cooperation with other countries' security agencies.

Basically we are now going to go out into the world and give Google access to a huge machine learning corpus for free (our photos and the tags we use), that they will then figure out how to use to train their AI system.

Consider this as a not-very-hypothetical: in China, some new political movement creates their own flag/banner and starts protesting using this.

Google can now tag every time that flag is pictured or shows up in video, and uses facial recognition to figure out who is present at the protest - turning this info over to the Chinese government.

Sorry - unless I can firewall the Pixel2 away from Google's embrace ... simply not interested.

But, 98!

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2017 at 17:50 UTC
In reply to:

KyleSlamchez: What is the point of this "article?"

Using the official news feed to take a cheap shot at a competing website is not only bad form, it also provides no meaningful content to readers.

I'm not sure what you mean by "take a cheap shot at a competing website". The article is satire, on another site, that we found to be funny, so we shared it with our readers.

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2017 at 16:48 UTC
Total: 246, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »