Kinematic Digit

Kinematic Digit

Lives in Canada Canada
Works as a Producer and Artist
Joined on Nov 9, 2010

Comments

Total: 209, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Holscen: Is this version a good option for Lightroom mobile? I believe it's got the same lightning port connection speed of its predecessor, which was usb2, that seems like an awful bottleneck to inherit.

Anybody on here using iPad pros for Lightroom- how do you find it?

Thanks

I use mine when I want to do lots of edits on the couch. You still should sync to a computer but then you use the iPad Pro to do the bulk edits. I have the 12.9" one which makes it very easy to scan thumbnails.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2017 at 21:44 UTC
In reply to:

Carrmack: Would love to be a fly on the wall watching Max Lowe editing with that codec that no doubt left him with giant files. He must have a monster computer and an abundance of time. Why would anyone shoot video on a more expensive camera with too much crop, that costs $3500 ? The better move is to buy a $1000 used GH4 and have the same quality,with reasonable file sizes. Better yet wait for the GH5 and get a way better video camera for $2000. The Canon 5D Mark IV is unsuitable for anyone who shoots video on a regular basis.

For starters, having multiple cameras is a pain. I just sold off several of my Sony A7 stuff and reduced my kit to the 5Dmk4. I have a shogun on my A7s as well and it has far larger files than what the 5Dmk4 produces so that doesn't bother me. Frankly if you're working in 4K, you really need to have a pretty quick computer to begin with.

Aside from that, I set up my kit for run and gun footage for several product launches. Mixed it up with 4K and HD shooting. I found it excellent in many ways (especially comparing it to my Sony A7s which is bulkier because the purpose built cage). The touch screen makes focus way easier to do pull focus, but overall the dual AF system pretty much eliminates the need to worry much over that. As much as I would love a GH4 or 5, it brings me back to multiple cameras for single purposes. The 5Dmk4 is an all around system that meets my multiple needs in my job. Might not be exclusively video, but when I do, I know I can rely on it.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 14:46 UTC
On article Got focal range? Canon 24-105mm F4L II sample gallery (101 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kinematic Digit: I got this lens in December with my new 5Dmk4. Been putting it through the ropes, and using it in work as well as personal.

Been very happy with the performance, and I've owned the previous version as well, and it's a massive improvement. I also have 24-70 F/2.8 II and the F/4 to compare, and this lens out performs them in many ways. The extra reach is very good to have especially when doing product shooting (which I do a lot in my work). Although it's only F/4, the IS makes up for that in low light which pretty much makes me choose it over the F/2.8 when I'm covering events.

This lens is a winner in my books. It's the perfect working pro's lens that covers at least for me 90% of what I do.

Sorry for the delay in reply. The key areas I've noticed improvements were primarily in distortion, CA control, and flare control. Sharpness I never had issues with the Mark I, but CA and distortion both in wide and tele are marked improvements in the files I've looked at. Both at 24mm this lens vs my 24-70 F/2.8 L II look pretty similar. Vignette is much better however I do like vigettte, but it's always better to add in post than to reduce it.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 07:02 UTC
On article Got focal range? Canon 24-105mm F4L II sample gallery (101 comments in total)

I got this lens in December with my new 5Dmk4. Been putting it through the ropes, and using it in work as well as personal.

Been very happy with the performance, and I've owned the previous version as well, and it's a massive improvement. I also have 24-70 F/2.8 II and the F/4 to compare, and this lens out performs them in many ways. The extra reach is very good to have especially when doing product shooting (which I do a lot in my work). Although it's only F/4, the IS makes up for that in low light which pretty much makes me choose it over the F/2.8 when I'm covering events.

This lens is a winner in my books. It's the perfect working pro's lens that covers at least for me 90% of what I do.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2017 at 18:01 UTC as 14th comment | 4 replies
On article Canon granted third most US patents in 2016 (145 comments in total)

Just picked up the 5Dmk4 over the holidays. I own 5 Sony cameras, both A and E mounts. I'm very happy to return to Canon. Keeping my A7s but there has been plenty of innovation that I've appreciated in the 5Dmk4 over the 5Dmk3.

Canon's wifi tether alone is exceptional which makes all of Sony's apps with limited functions something they can learn on how to do it right. The DR has not been a problem for me with a small exception of extreme highlights (DRO is good to have on). But overall I'm happy to be back with Canon and found their improvements many steps ahead of it's past offering including my 1Dx that is my primary workhorse.

I really find that this whole system has been innovative, and found touch screens a very very important addition to my workflow. Been using it more in my work as of late, and probably will continue to do so.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2017 at 01:26 UTC as 42nd comment
In reply to:

Jerry Pruce: The more pixels the better. But why does it have to be so expensive? If it was around $3000 I'd buy it. And I wish they would make it smaller. Maybe in the next year or two, they'll come out with the 200mp version and the 100mp one will drop in price more to my liking. I think their shooting themselves in the foot by not offering the camera at an affordable price for the masses.

The silicon platter accepts only a certain amount of sensors on it (4 is the maximum I believe), and the failure rate of each silicon platter is pretty high (I believe its around 1/3 of all chips would fail).

This is also the reason why FF 135 format chips are expensive (I think it's around 7)

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2016 at 18:22 UTC

blah, it's a 1.3x crop sensor... who cares ;)

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2015 at 20:57 UTC as 53rd comment | 1 reply

It's kind of a clever little app. It's going to be great for some mid-level shooters, and then there will be some that will just crap all over it as a concept because they hate anything with the name HDR in it or the mention of GNDs.

It's a bit of a misnomer of an app. I wish they called it Sky Layer Masking. That is closer to what it really is. It's not HDR, or is it a GND replacement. However the term 'Layer Masking' might also confuse some as well. Maybe Sky Blending? Either way, it's still a very valid tool to have, and for the price of a cheap lunch, it's worth checking it out. Layer masking is something that many professional landscapers have been using for a very long time, and I think good for Sony to make it an easy to use app vs the technical requirements of Photoshop.

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2015 at 22:16 UTC as 46th comment
In reply to:

aut0maticdan: I don't know. I am a huge fan of the a7S and this gets the two things I thought would get me to upgrade to the mkII: IBIS and internal 4K.

in a post a7RII world, where we have "good enough" video and sensitivity in a 42MP body with great PDAF, this coming out lacking hyper fast readout speeds, high frame rate and PDAF leaves me feeling lukewarm.

This gen it seems so much more niche than the first time around. I think they spoiled us with the a7RII. This is really only going to sell to hardcore video junkies (but aren't they using gimbals and shoguns?). I can't see getting this over an a7S or a7RII for stills.

I'm not upgrading I don't think... I have the A7s and the Shogun and I have way more features than the minor update this camera offers. I also have the A7II so IBIS is also nothing I get excited over. I also have a 3 axis gimbal which is way better than IBIS anyhow.

Add to your point above about increased MP, 12 is not a magic number for 4K super 35. in crop mode it is 5 MP, this is why an increase to 16MP is needed. Regardless, I was hoping for a far bigger leap in innovation in this announcement.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 23:06 UTC
In reply to:

Kinematic Digit: As I'm developing some grading and colour correction profiles for the A7 series of cameras, I'm running into the limits of stage 2 raw compression (stripe). It's not something I worry about too much, but this confirms what I've observed as I've been building SLOG profiles.

It's an annoying attribute, and reminds me of the pattern noise you see in Canon files but it also gives limits to what I can do from a profile building aspect.

Bottom line though is there is no free lunch. One either learns to manage or work with the limitations, or complain and whine about it. I've decided to go with working with it.

Although it would be great for Sony to give us an option to turn things off, it will likely mean rebuilding all my profiles for the new system if they do.

I build both RAW and LUTs for the camera. I'm fully aware of the difference of compression between RAW, JPG and Video. Regardless, it doesn't negate the fact they both come from the same source and both exhibit their limitations.

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2015 at 22:44 UTC
In reply to:

Kinematic Digit: As I'm developing some grading and colour correction profiles for the A7 series of cameras, I'm running into the limits of stage 2 raw compression (stripe). It's not something I worry about too much, but this confirms what I've observed as I've been building SLOG profiles.

It's an annoying attribute, and reminds me of the pattern noise you see in Canon files but it also gives limits to what I can do from a profile building aspect.

Bottom line though is there is no free lunch. One either learns to manage or work with the limitations, or complain and whine about it. I've decided to go with working with it.

Although it would be great for Sony to give us an option to turn things off, it will likely mean rebuilding all my profiles for the new system if they do.

I build profiles for both video and stills. I see the patterns in both. There is still some level of intervention from the sensor to the 8-bit XAVC conversion going on as well. It has similar but not identical properties with RAW still images.

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2015 at 22:05 UTC

As I'm developing some grading and colour correction profiles for the A7 series of cameras, I'm running into the limits of stage 2 raw compression (stripe). It's not something I worry about too much, but this confirms what I've observed as I've been building SLOG profiles.

It's an annoying attribute, and reminds me of the pattern noise you see in Canon files but it also gives limits to what I can do from a profile building aspect.

Bottom line though is there is no free lunch. One either learns to manage or work with the limitations, or complain and whine about it. I've decided to go with working with it.

Although it would be great for Sony to give us an option to turn things off, it will likely mean rebuilding all my profiles for the new system if they do.

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2015 at 20:22 UTC as 240th comment | 5 replies
On article Lens Rentals Canada closes its doors (178 comments in total)

Sadly it does not surprise me that shipping was one of the major factors.

We have a real issue with shipping in Canada, and sadly, Canada Post also owns Purolator a courier company that is 10 times better, but also twice the already expensive postal rate.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 21:10 UTC as 56th comment | 7 replies
On article Accessory Review: LaCie Rugged Thunderbolt (40 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kinematic Digit: I refuse to buy or recommend any Lacie products anymore. They have one of the worst failure rates of their products out there.

The service support doesn't exist with them with issues, and in certain cases (such as out of warranty), they will advise people to buy a new product for 15% off instead of repairing problems that have been well documented and mentioned by other including on their own support forums.

NEVER BUY A LACIE PRODUCT until they have fixed their QA issues, warranty issues, and put in place a proper after warranty program.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=lacie+failure+rate

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2014 at 19:16 UTC
On article Accessory Review: LaCie Rugged Thunderbolt (40 comments in total)

I refuse to buy or recommend any Lacie products anymore. They have one of the worst failure rates of their products out there.

The service support doesn't exist with them with issues, and in certain cases (such as out of warranty), they will advise people to buy a new product for 15% off instead of repairing problems that have been well documented and mentioned by other including on their own support forums.

NEVER BUY A LACIE PRODUCT until they have fixed their QA issues, warranty issues, and put in place a proper after warranty program.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2014 at 14:38 UTC as 16th comment | 8 replies

Expect a 2 or more year wait for this. Most of my associates that shoot with the S2 have been so frustrated by the timelines for their lenses.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 17:15 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
On article MIT algorithm predicts photo popularity (88 comments in total)

My picture of the moon was more popular than Kate Upton. Go figure :)

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2014 at 07:26 UTC as 54th comment
On article A travel-sized large-format 4x5 camera? (219 comments in total)
In reply to:

fratiodan: Will this only accept 90mm lenses? I have a kodak ektar 152mm f4.5 that i would want to use.

The focusing helicoid can't handle that focal length. It's optimized for 90mm to keep it compact.

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2014 at 20:02 UTC
On article Adobe launches Lightroom for iPad (130 comments in total)
In reply to:

erichK: The most important factor is Adobe's violation of their assurance that they would not compel Lightroom users to become captives of their "bleed-every-month" subscription system.

A very good reason to look elsewhere that this moster corporation for software. And an opportunbity for *real* innovators.

It's an added feature so you don't have to be tied to this.

Regardless, it wouldn't be possible to not be doing this on a CC because it requires cloud services to work. So if you need this feature you'll be paying for use of the cloud server.

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 15:57 UTC
Total: 209, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »