Androole

What @mgrum is saying makes sense to me - since the Bayer array never reproduces anything except R, G, and B pixels, it seems like the only value in having a wider overlap in spectra would be to...

"If I'm not working, I don't touch the gear. Camera phone is more that adequate on vacation because I get to enjoy and experience instead of being stuck behind a camera."

If you had a slicker,...

I believe that all the Panasonic bodies with 5-axis IBIS (GX85, G85, GH5) stabilize the viewfinder on half-press, like Olympus bodies. Older Panasonic bodies like my GX7, or the GX8 in question, ...

Yes, I was being a bit tongue in cheek with respect to his constant f/2.8 requirement (independent of sensor size). All the same, the OP suggested in his later posts that he wasn't thrilled with ...

Probably a D500 with a 24-70/f2.8. Maybe a D750 with a 24-120/f4, if he can hold his nose over the noise performance of an f/4 lens.

Anyone have a clue what bitrate the 4K/60fps out of this will be?

It's using HEVC so it'll punch above its weight codec-wise, but I'm still guessing that no one using an iPhone is willing to have...

Sadly, if that is the case, nothing in any other system will work. You will not be able to find anything that matches (or even comes close) to the low light image quality of a D5 with f2.8 lenses ...

Honestly, I think you might not be able to find what you are looking forward. If you are accustomed to the output from D5s and D500s with f2.8 lenses, shooting in light that requires ISO 3200-6400, ...

I feel like time has passed slide film over.

It's nice to look at the physical thing, but the lack of dynamic range and the difficulty and expense of processing it doesn't make it a lot of fun to...

The APS-C sensor isn't particularly expensive by itself, but a brand new design for a fast, sharp integrated lens to cover that sensor doesn't come cheap!

The G1X came with a 12.5-62.5/f2-3.9 lens...

The only thing I'm interested here is the supposedly new Bayer Filter technology they're talking about...

Any chance we could get a tech article?

The G1X Mk. II was released for $799. If it is going with a larger sensor and more capabilities, I can almost guarantee Canon will want to charge more than $999. Whenever Canon thinks they have an...

Bambi24, your comparison is a total crock of garbage and you yourself surely know it.

You're saying with a straight face that an 88-400mm equivalent zoom on an entry level Canon body is going to...

But what are you looking for in an RX100 VI? This is just the RX10 catching up to the tech in the RX100 V.

I think lack of $$$ is still a good excuse, haha.

Yes, Kirk Tuck's blog details lots of professional work using his RX10s and FZ2500. He's a pretty pragmatic, no-nonsense guy, though. His only job is satisfying the clients, and he understands the...

Who said anything about conspiracies? I listed the practical reason why pros aren't using this camera: they already own expensive FF DSLRs, and feel no reason to stop using them.

Until government...

Absolutely Sony did, no denying that. I even alluded to the Minolta 7D in my first post. Sony was building off of the foundation of work that Minolta had already begun when they acquired...

Mostly, the pros are still using their old 5D II and IIIs and 1DSs. Those are the cams at press conferences, because they are bought and paid for, and they work well enough. Photojournalism isn't a...

Especially since the 16-50mm is an absolute dog of a lens compared to the 24-600 equiv. Zeiss in the RX10.

Despite the APS-C sensor, it would struggle to resolve more detail than the RX10 in any...