Joined on Sep 28, 2012


Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6
On article Fujifilm X-E2 Review (312 comments in total)
In reply to:

H Umland: I purchased a Fuji X-E2 + 18-55mm kit lens in March 2015. My first test photos revealed that the lower left and right corner were blurred which usually indicates a decentered lens element or group. I returned the lens for repair.
When it came back, the lower left corner had improved but the lower right corner had become even worse. I returned the lens for repair again (Fuji refused to exchange the lens). Afterwards, the lens error was still visible but had been reduced to a tolerable level.
Then I took the camera on a 3-week vacation trip. Surprise: After one week, the camera body suddenly stopped working for no obvious reason (EVF and LCD monitor remained black after turning the camera on). Now I'm sending it back to Fuji for the next repair attempt.
Conclusion: I'm through with Fuji. They are certainly able to build good cameras but it looks as if they don't care much about quality control any more and leave the job to their customers.

Sounds like a streak of really bad luck. Why haven't you just returned the camera and the lens to where you bought them from? I often find that it is so much easier to deal with the retailer than the manufacturer

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2016 at 21:05 UTC
In reply to:

peevee1: Absolutely unnecessary if your EVF is working as it should (as even in A57).

EVF will always introduce an ever so slight delay. When you're trying to shoot a somewhat dynamic scene, OVF is really the only option.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 18:38 UTC
In reply to:

Mike99999: It's funny how everyone gets so excited about what is essentially a repackaged Canon Rebel or Nikon DX. This is some nice marketing from Fuji's side to first release an insanely overpriced X-Pro1 to create a myth, and then cut the price to normal levels. The only thing this camera does differently from a Nikon DX is a nice retro look.

And yes, APS-C can be great. Nikon knew it when they put out their first and second generation DSLRs, and Fuji knows it now. Making a full frame version of this thing is just a recipe for disaster: expensive, bulky lenses, soft corners... and for what? 1 stop of DoF?

I agree, full frame cameras are a completely different beast from x-pro1, if fuji decided to go there it'll be a new line of cameras all together.

X-pro1 has seriously very little in common with any cannon or nikon. You know, being a range finder like, completely different color filter, focus, etc... Seriously, just go to a photography store and play with one.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 18:37 UTC
In reply to:

Mbaris: Although xpro1 is really a magnificent camera, something with a soul, i have to admit focusing is a mess. Manual focus is slow and unintiutive, autofocus is slow and unreliable, it requires much convincing to make it take a shot really. Still, it is so much fun to use it.

Does the new zoom lens have a faster autofocus motor?

If I had a wish from Fuji for this platform, it would not be a full frame sensor (the sensor is really magnificent already, compared to my 5Dm2) or a zoom lens

It would be a lens with "USM" "FTM" equivalent features I really admire in practicality in my canon L lenses.

I think it's all by wire. Actually I am surprised to hear that there are focusing motors in lens since x-pro1 focuses based on contrast...

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 18:31 UTC
In reply to:

Boxbrownie: Without wishing to wade through every post here, am I the only one who thinks it is a bit odd that when zooming out the veiwfinder frame line magnification cannot revert to the standard magnification and show the true coverage without having to hold the button for two seconds? Or is this a feature that is implemented as an option but not reviewed?

Good observation, but I don't think it's all that weird since additional magnification in OVF is achieved though a mechanical lens moving in and out when you hold the button. I wouldn't want it to jump in and out while I am zooming you know...

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 18:30 UTC
In reply to:

RedwodGuy: Someone said the X-Pro 1 was a repackaged Rebel. If it is, it is a successful job of turning a hum-drum dSLR into an exciting to use RF that produces ridiculously superb IQ, and the whole kit with three lenses, hoods and extra batteries can be carried in a simple feather LIGHT bag. Hooray for the "repackagers" then! They really are brilliant!

Who could compare it to rebel? It's a completely different camera: crop factor is difference, rangefinder-like, color filter etc...

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 18:27 UTC
Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6