0lf

0lf

Lives in France France
Joined on Aug 12, 2008

0lf's recent activity

  • Is there no adapter to use Canon lenses on other's products ?
  • In fact, Canon state they have a global strategy which mix dSLR and mirrorless, so some (most) market segments are covered by dSLR and not by mirrorless (yet). So make a comparison about ...
  • Because of marketing and segmentation does not mean the M50 has all the hardware but Canon disabled the feature. They clearly said it was nos possible in the M50
  • English is not my native language, so may be you can provide me a better term for the designation of people complaining ad nauseam, opening countless thread about the same thing instead of simply ...
  • My statement is based on data provided by a DPR member : https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60896326
  • https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/products/details/cameras/eos-m-series-digital-cameras/eos-m50-ef-m-15-45mm-is-stm-kit @ 2:20
  • Replied in <facepalm>
    Your argument is inexistant, just like the M5 2 It means the idea is so dumb one person is not enough to express how sad, sorry, whatever he is. If I have to explain this, it is not surprising you ...
  • Putting its relevance into perspective is quite humble IMHO ;) And I sometimes whine too. I am humble enough to recognize it is often not a good way.
  • Replied in <facepalm>
    memory too. Fast readout, processing and memory. The phone can extract a lot of data from its sensor, store it and process it. But it is not the point. The two devices put the money on different ...
  • Canon began the M quite some times ago, and expand the line very slowly despite the whiners: (1) We have the 4K crowd and Canon release the first 4K M after every one else, and with a limited feature set,
  • I wonder if it work
  • Replied in <facepalm>
    You just don't understand the point. The silicon and the glass cost a lot more in a camera than on a phone. So for a phone, money can be invested in developing fast readout and processing. So it ...
  • Replied in <facepalm>
    Nothing. But since we compare photo camera and we are a minimum interested in IQ, we should agree than it is more honest to compare devices were sensor and lens represent a significative amount of ...
  • Replied in <facepalm>
    His post is only cherry quoting and misinterpretation, as I already said. There is nothing in this post that prove your point. If there is a thread with a proof instead of empty accusation, please ...
  • Replied in <facepalm>
    And which one has DPAF at this price point ? Plus, it is not the point. You said Canon intentionally crippled the camera. The fact that other manufacturer would have the tech would not prove that ...
  • Replied in <facepalm>
    The image pipeline is a bit more complex than just a processor.
  • Replied in <facepalm>
    No. TRANSLATION: given the price point of the M50, we cannot reproduce the image pipeline of the 5D4.
  • Replied in <facepalm>
    but So, I don't know how you translate "it was not possible" into "Canon intentionally crippled their camera". Some people looks to think than cherry pick some part of what Canon said or blatantly ...
  • Replied in M50 & 4K
    How does it make a non marketing decision ? A marketing decision does not mean they could have done it but choose to cripple the camera for segmentation. They obviously don't have the tech at the ...
  • The statement said that Canon want to gain ILC market share tanks to mirrorless. As I said earlier, in order to do that, Canon needs to approximately double how much mirrorless they sell. If DSLR ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
Total messages 1052
Threads started 13
Last post 1 month ago
Total comments 209
Total likes 293
Last post 1 month ago
Total reviews 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 0