Lives in France France
Works as a Computer Graphics
Has a website at
Joined on Nov 9, 2010


Total: 330, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Ask the staff: electronic or optical viewfinder? (891 comments in total)

I use both, but i prefer optical, by far.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 06:11 UTC as 174th comment
In reply to:

maksa: Well, we have how the excellent K-3 II and almost no lenses to use with it. Sigma abandoned K-mount, while Pentax introduces large and expensive full-frame lenses. And yes, updates its 55-300mm each few years. Disappointing.

Petroglyph, you've forget the magic triplet : FA 31, 43 & 77.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 15:23 UTC
On article CP+ 2017: Ricoh teases upcoming D FA* 50mm F1.4 (95 comments in total)
In reply to:

Karroly: Why is the D FA* 50mm F1.4 much bigger than the SMC FA 50mm F1.4 ?
Built-in AF motor ?
Additional glass elements/groups to improve IQ ?

Optics for digital cameras requires more lenses to avoid and treat chromatic abberations.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 15:18 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: Remember when 50mm lenses were nice and compact?

@Danscilc :

Try again...
Shoting with a vintage FA 85 f1.4 wide open gives better results than a Canon 85 f1.2 mkII :

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 06:47 UTC
On article CP+ 2017: Ricoh teases upcoming D FA* 50mm F1.4 (95 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cheezr: I would like a modern 16-70mm APS-C WR lens from Pentax..

Like the 16-85 ?

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 06:39 UTC
In reply to:

MrALLCAPS: I know this is gonna get the fanboys upset, but in my opinion...

Panasonic should buy Nikon.

Panasonic's direct rival is Sony. Sony brought Minolta, and look where they're at now.
Panasonic sided with Leica, but has received unwarranted hate from photogs, due to lack of photo history, WHICH is the dumbest thing I've ever heard of.

If Panasonic were to absorb Nikon, not only would they save it, but improve on them, with one of the best video tech. Canon would be forced to improve their tech.

You know I'm right...

" They own mirrorless right now. ".

Nop, just check bcn ranking for 2016, for mlc, sony is behind Oly & Canon :

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 05:59 UTC

Looks excellent for me. Lovely lens.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 20:01 UTC as 19th comment
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (638 comments in total)

Pretty impressive hi-iso samples :

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2017 at 07:01 UTC as 22nd comment
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (638 comments in total)

The question is, why would i buy this camera instead of a K3II which cost 900$ ?

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 21:03 UTC as 39th comment | 8 replies

And in two years : pentax 100th anniversary.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 14:38 UTC as 45th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Get a RX100 or G7 X series camera. Those have way faster lenses, better sensor and are far more compact.

Apples & oranges, what append if you want to chage the lens on those cameras ?

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 08:02 UTC
In reply to:

Frank C.: Tech is good but Hasselblad needs to get an Italian designer on board.

Italian designers ? Like the ones who "design" the Hasselblad Lunar ?

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2016 at 08:00 UTC
In reply to:

Ole Moller: Does the tools work i 16 bit? Very importent.

16 /32 bits

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2016 at 13:31 UTC

B.T.W., if you develop raw files with Photo on a Mac, you have the choice of the engine you'd like to use :

Affinity team raw engine
Apple raw Engine.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2016 at 08:08 UTC as 36th comment
On article Have your say: Best prime lens of 2016 (152 comments in total)

No Laowa or Irix this year ?

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2016 at 13:22 UTC as 51st comment
On article Lensrentals tears down the Nikon 105mm F1.4 (157 comments in total)

TIL than one of Roger Cicala's personnal camera is a Pentax K-1.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 10:29 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

Mike99999: Wow, there is something wrong with the Mark I samples. I had to compare to the E-M5 to get a decent comparison.

My conclusion:
- E-M1 II has a slight increase in detail over the E-M5
- E-M1 II is one stop behind the D500 in terms of ISO noise
- E-M1 II is three stops behind the A7R II in terms of ISO noise

To make myself clearer: E-M1 II at ISO 800 has the same noise level as A7R II at ISO 6400.

I don't understand why you compare a 4/3 sensor to a full frame one...

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2016 at 10:06 UTC
On article DPReview Asks: What was your first camera? (765 comments in total)

Canon T-50

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2016 at 14:29 UTC as 75th comment

Sorry to say, but those pics didn't reflect the spectacular landscapes you can admire in Iceland... they are pretty boring and unexpressive...

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 08:18 UTC as 114th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

EthanP99: So... 960fps 1080p doesnt impress anyone?

Maybe because it's not real 1080p, H.F.R. at 960ftps uses 1136x384px for 2secs. sequences, and 800x270px (!) for 4sec sequences... pretty far from full H.D. i guess.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2016 at 06:22 UTC
Total: 330, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »