Couscousdelight

Lives in France France
Works as a Computer Graphics
Has a website at http://www.labellelumiere.fr
Joined on Nov 9, 2010

Comments

Total: 303, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

And in two years : pentax 100th anniversary.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 14:38 UTC as 44th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Get a RX100 or G7 X series camera. Those have way faster lenses, better sensor and are far more compact.

Apples & oranges, what append if you want to chage the lens on those cameras ?

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 08:02 UTC
In reply to:

Frank C.: Tech is good but Hasselblad needs to get an Italian designer on board.

Italian designers ? Like the ones who "design" the Hasselblad Lunar ?
http://photorumors.com/2012/10/10/hasselblad-opens-new-design-centre-in-italy/

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2016 at 08:00 UTC
In reply to:

Ole Moller: Does the tools work i 16 bit? Very importent.

16 /32 bits

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2016 at 13:31 UTC

B.T.W., if you develop raw files with Photo on a Mac, you have the choice of the engine you'd like to use :

Affinity team raw engine
Apple raw Engine.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2016 at 08:08 UTC as 33rd comment
On article Have your say: Best prime lens of 2016 (153 comments in total)

No Laowa or Irix this year ?

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2016 at 13:22 UTC as 51st comment
On article Lensrentals tears down the Nikon 105mm F1.4 (157 comments in total)

TIL than one of Roger Cicala's personnal camera is a Pentax K-1.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 10:29 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

Mike99999: Wow, there is something wrong with the Mark I samples. I had to compare to the E-M5 to get a decent comparison.

My conclusion:
- E-M1 II has a slight increase in detail over the E-M5
- E-M1 II is one stop behind the D500 in terms of ISO noise
- E-M1 II is three stops behind the A7R II in terms of ISO noise

To make myself clearer: E-M1 II at ISO 800 has the same noise level as A7R II at ISO 6400.

I don't understand why you compare a 4/3 sensor to a full frame one...

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2016 at 10:06 UTC
On article DPReview Asks: What was your first camera? (764 comments in total)

Canon T-50

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2016 at 14:29 UTC as 72nd comment

Meh...
Sorry to say, but those pics didn't reflect the spectacular landscapes you can admire in Iceland... they are pretty boring and unexpressive...

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 08:18 UTC as 114th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

EthanP99: So... 960fps 1080p doesnt impress anyone?

Maybe because it's not real 1080p, H.F.R. at 960ftps uses 1136x384px for 2secs. sequences, and 800x270px (!) for 4sec sequences... pretty far from full H.D. i guess.
http://imgur.com/WHtOewX

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2016 at 06:22 UTC
On article Apple revamps MacBook Pro lineup, adds 'Touch Bar' (870 comments in total)
In reply to:

MikeFairbanks: I have a 2015 MBP. It's great.

Did this new one really get rid of the magnetic plug-in power cord? That was a genius move that they bragged about on their careers page for years.

>It's because EU is requiring all devices to standardize on the charging port. So Apple is not allowed to have a proprietary charger anymore. Thanks, Europe.

No, it's only for smartphones, not laptop.

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2016 at 08:51 UTC
In reply to:

Angrymagpie: Why doesn't Sony give us more lenses?
Are lenses technically more difficult to produce?
This looks like a great camera. But I'd like a weather-sealed version of the 24/1.8 to pair with it (which would hopefully be shorter than the current Zeiss one).
Maybe a more affordable version of the standard zoom?

Yes, wide angle lenses are more difficult to product on such camera because of the very short flange distance between the mount and the sensor ( ~1.8cm) .
http://ilovehatephoto.com/2015/02/23/3-detailed-reasons-not-to-switch-to-sony-full-frame-mirrorless-system/

And it's even worst for FF lenses...

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2016 at 07:54 UTC

1 700€ ?

Haha, nop, thank you.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2016 at 05:52 UTC as 63rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Kostasm: Raw image quality is superb, another dimension to smartphone camera quality. Bravo Apple!

Are you drunk ? :)
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr20_0=apple_iphone7plus&attr20_1=samsung_galaxys5&attr21_0=20&attr21_1=40&attr22_0=daylight&attr22_1=daylight&attr26_0=raw&attr26_1=jpeg&attr293_0=wide&attr293_1=wide&normalization=full&widget=365&x=-0.5685502046018491&y=0.28507333771328774

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 13:36 UTC
On article Flickr Marketplace image licensing program shuttered (91 comments in total)
In reply to:

JeremiahL: Given Yahoo's history with their other acquisitions, and some of their decisions with Flickr, it's really amazing that Flickr is still around.

I was happily paying for a "Pro" account that I rarely used until Yahoo stepped in and cancelled it a few years back.

Fortunately I moved everything over to SmugMug a long time ago. I keep the Flickr around because there's no reason to delete it.

I still have my pro account too.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2016 at 05:38 UTC
On article Opinion: Park vandals need to be stopped (338 comments in total)

Not exactly the same, but in France in 1992, a prehistoric cave with bison painting was erased by a scouting association !
And they've done it for a good deed : they just wanted to clean the place...
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/22/world/french-youths-clean-a-cave-and-damage-prehistoric-art.html

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2016 at 15:57 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

StevenE: People question m4/3 format for good reason when we see lenses like this at US$1300.
This is equivalent to a FF 24 f/2.8, which can be had for Canon at US$550, less than half the price and it is smaller and lighter. Even more significantly, you can get a FF 24mm f/1.4 from Sigma for US$850, that's a US$450 savings, and there is, and likely never will be, a m4/3 equivalent to that!
So, although it has it's uses, micro 4/3 is a compromised format

"This is equivalent to a FF 24 f/2.8"
Equivalent for depht of lied, but not for light transmission...

And franquly, the purpose of a wide angle lens is not to produce bokeh...

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 05:19 UTC

Now, please Ricoh, could you put a 1 inch sensor and a EVF in a Q ?
Instant buy for me...

Link | Posted on May 11, 2016 at 06:19 UTC as 14th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Gesture: The real challenge. Don't rush the production. Make sure quality is as good as possible. Pentax doesn't want an "issue." I think they understand that.

I suppose than Pentax is the company which had the most time to spend to prepare their full frame DSLR...

Link | Posted on May 9, 2016 at 19:04 UTC
Total: 303, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »