rpm40

rpm40

Lives in United States Buffalo, NY, United States
Joined on Sep 22, 2005

Comments

Total: 505, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article SeaLife DC2000 sample gallery (155 comments in total)
In reply to:

justmeMN: "After all, it's the only camera with a 1"-type sensor and fast, fixed prime lens currently on the market." -DPR

Olympus should "join the party" and make a 1" sensor version of their Tough camera.

I would be really surprised if Olympus released a 1" tough model. Maybe Panasonic? They have some similar tough cams and already have a few 1" lines. As a bonus, their menus are much more user friendly than Oly's.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2018 at 18:59 UTC
On article SeaLife DC2000 sample gallery (155 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mr Kobayashi: If you’re going to do a fixed FL, make it at M 4/3 sensor. You can make a lens just as flat and compact (it’s been done with APSC) but you end up with better IQ. For what it offers, the price needs to come down.

Yes, you could always trade off larger size for better IQ, but where do you draw the line? The 1" sensor is a nice compromise in size and performance. There aren't any really cutting edge m4/3 sensors right now that people are lining up for. If you go all the way up to APS you're talking about a totally different product.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2018 at 18:55 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200/TZ200 Review (594 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jeff Fenske: To achieve this huge range, they use many multi-surface, specialty lens elements, and these probably have some POLYMER surfaces — unlike the stellar LX100 lens that uses ONLY GLASS elements. This is bound to make a significant difference in contrast and sharpness, but isn't mentioned in reviews.

Why is the Sony's RX10 IV so sharp in comparison, and has an even larger range? Perhaps they used more glass and less polymer.

Dude....

http://j.mp/2s4QcKb

Whether you look at the mk i, ii, iii, the rx10s are massively larger and heavier than the Panasonic, with the same sensor size. The Sony is known to have a very good and far less compromised lens. The Panasonic is full of compromises to make it small. These are as far apart as two 1" sensor models can get in terms of lens design.

Link | Posted on May 21, 2018 at 20:37 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200/TZ200 Review (594 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jeff Fenske: To achieve this huge range, they use many multi-surface, specialty lens elements, and these probably have some POLYMER surfaces — unlike the stellar LX100 lens that uses ONLY GLASS elements. This is bound to make a significant difference in contrast and sharpness, but isn't mentioned in reviews.

Why is the Sony's RX10 IV so sharp in comparison, and has an even larger range? Perhaps they used more glass and less polymer.

the rx10 IV is huge compared to this camera, and much more expensive.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2018 at 15:37 UTC

How wide? The specs say 107 degree coverage so would that be about 16mm?

Link | Posted on May 3, 2018 at 14:45 UTC as 19th comment | 4 replies

Minor note, the article says it’s f1.8 but the product photo says f1.6- which is correct?

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2018 at 16:08 UTC as 61st comment | 2 replies

It sure looks cool, but heck, for this price it should be coated in Vantablack.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2018 at 17:56 UTC as 102nd comment
On article Canon EOS M50 Review (1312 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boeing skipper: It sure doesn't look as nice as a Fuji, but Sony users calling the M50 "ugly"?
Do you actually think the A6300 is a nice looking camera?

@suave, the Olympus Pen F and several of the other Pens are pretty nice.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 20:56 UTC

That yogurt container line is priceless. Seriously, plastic lens mount? There are a few things that just seem like they aren't worth the 50 cents cost savings to avoid angry owners calling when their $2,000 lens snaps off the body but what do I know....

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 21:09 UTC as 101st comment | 9 replies
On article Panasonic officially unveils 50-200mm F2.8-4.0 ASPH (303 comments in total)
In reply to:

wlad: umm, so why does a slower MFT zoom cost as much as a professional 70-200mm f2.8 full frame zoom ?

Prices don't always translate that easily, but for example its in between the price of the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS and the 70-200 4 IS. Prices on equivalent Nikon and Sony lenses are higher yet. It is smaller and lighter than the 70-200 f4, and it has a wider range. (Also figure Canon has sold a lot more of their design over the years than Panny will).

Long story short- price is probably reasonable, and chances are it will be a nice lens.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 17:27 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 sample gallery (57 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ben Herrmann: Whenever somebody looks at a series of sample images from any new camera, the responses can range the gamut of "hey, they look great," to "gosh, they are horrible..." Now go figure? To me, these look really good.

But more so is the fact that this kit lens - the Panny 12-60 - is a wonderful optic for both the focal range and price point. I've fallen in love with this lens a year or more ago and wound up with 3 of them. This kit lens (actually, IMO, it's performance levels are much better than a kit lens designation would imply) can stand up to the best of them (save perhaps the lack of a constant F2.8 aperture). Yet this lens is often (unfortunately) overlooked in favor of far more expensive optics.

Also, what I welcome is the gradual shift in how Panasonic renders colors. The color tonality of recent Panny cameras are gradually shifting to a more warmer tone without going bonkers by adding more red to the hues. This GX9 and 12-60 lens seems a great combination for the price.

I'm not surprised you are a fan of the 12-60 kit, Panasonic knows how to make a good cheap kit lens, and they have been doing it right from the start. Their old 14-45mm that came with the original G1 was quite a nice bargain lens. The 14-42 ii and 12-32 are both pretty decent kit lenses as well.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2018 at 17:08 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200/TZ200 Review (594 comments in total)
In reply to:

noisephotographer: I think a 1/1.7" sensor + 28-300mm eq. f/2.8-f/2.8 (Olympus Stylus 1) could be more useful.

I think smaller sensors are dead, at the hands of cell phones.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2018 at 19:56 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200/TZ200 Review (594 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tieu Ngao: I prefer faster lens with less reach for the same compactness. For example 24-200mm f/2.8-4 would be more useful I think.

Just get a g7x and crop slightly. Voila!

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2018 at 19:55 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200/TZ200 Review (594 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rod McD: Can we please have the upgrade for the LX100? It's long overdue. We were told a year ago that it was in development...... I understand the appeal of the long zoom compact camera to many users but where's the high grade all-in-one option for the photographer who prefers a shorter range but faster zoom lens?

LX200, yes please. Tilting TOUCH screen. For those who prefer the old fashioned way, the touch can be disabled, but for some things like touch to focus, it is terrific.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2018 at 19:54 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200/TZ200 Review (594 comments in total)
In reply to:

Eric Glam: Panasonic really killed this line. The lens is too slow across the range, and the camera would be starving for light.
A shame, really, as they could have opted for a brighter lens, even with less reach, and everyone would have praised it.
Even without testing one, I can already guess how it would fair in less than ideal lighting conditions...

If this camera had a brighter, shorter lens, it would be just like the rest of the 1" options out there. Panasonic already has one of those.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2018 at 19:52 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix G9 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

peterwgallagher: Oh dear, more DPR 'click-bait'. Ho-hum! Isn't the conclusion absolutely, blinding obvious? They're both wonderful, clever, machines with minor differences. Yada-yada-yada.

Want a more meaningful comparison? Take a look at the respective groups on e.g. Flickr and ask yourself whether and why the images (as a collection) differ. You'll need some actual insight into photography and photographers, not just cameras/lenses... DPR won't be any help. Spend some time on this and you may discover some things (maybe about yourself... ).

Hey Buzz Killington, why are you here then? Some of us come to this site because we like reading about the gear.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2018 at 12:54 UTC
In reply to:

Oleg Ivanovskiy: What? 700 Euro for this F8 - F11 (equiv.) pancake kit? Brave decision, given that Fujifilm X-A5 15-45 kit is going for 600, with better sensor and some sort of PDAF. This E-PL is a few mm smaller, but that's all.

But that's one of the nice things about the m4/3 system, you have a few brands working together. I used to use the Olympus E-PM2 with the Panasonic f1.7 and it worked great, a nice compact kit. No need to match brands.

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2018 at 16:35 UTC
In reply to:

Gesture: Can't wait to see what E-PL18 is like in this world of dribble it out technology.

So all camera makers should stop making cameras and try making phones?

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2018 at 16:28 UTC
In reply to:

Beckler8: They shouldn't aim these specifically at beginners. I think companies are missing a segment, which is the smallest possible mirrorless. So whatever they can put into the smallest body like this, but for enthusiast level. That would be the best pocket camera - something almost as small as RX100 but an actual mirrorless with proper controls, etc. Maybe the Sony 5200? LOL - yeah right, Sony is clueless. They make top hardware but design-wise it's generally all garbage. A9 slowly moves in the right direction but it shouldn't take a decade to improve to something that's already known.

Panasonic made an admirable attempt with the GM-5, which had a viewfinder and was TINY with the right lenses, but I just don't think it sold that well. When lenses can only get so small for a given format, I think ultimate miniaturization becomes more about pushing limits than about functionality.

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2018 at 16:25 UTC
In reply to:

justmeMN: Even 1" sensor fixed-lens compacts have 20MP sensors. Entry-level APS-C cameras have 24MP. If nothing else, Olympus' decision to use a 16MP sensor is poor marketing.

Olympus squeezes the life out of every sensor they have, and they probably need to in order to make a profit, but 20mp would really help the marketing on these models. All the 1" sensors are 20mp, and they do a fine job with noise for their size.

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2018 at 16:16 UTC
Total: 505, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »