rpm40

rpm40

Lives in United States Buffalo, NY, United States
Joined on Sep 22, 2005

Comments

Total: 434, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Alex Permit: While she may be due an award the amount she's claiming is, prima facie, ridiculous. Judges should be able to dismiss, with prejudice, lawsuits with claims so high that they mock the legal system.

While this claim is certainly over the top at this point (to what extent exactly was she damaged?) the initial amount of the claim is mere procedure, and I am sure we will get to a far more reasonable result by the end. Things seem a lot more reasonable if you view the process as a whole. Don't just stop at the "woman sues for $2 billion for a snapshot" headline.

By the way, Shakespeare's ''The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers,'' was said by an anarchist looking to overthrow a king. Shakespeare was commenting on lawyers' value as defenders of law and order.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 15:44 UTC
In reply to:

deluk: Chipotle? Never heard of them. Such is the power of advertising. Mind you, I am in the UK and have never eaten a burrito. Perhaps I'll look them up on Google, or maybe not............

Never eaten a burrito? :O Quite a tragedy if you ask me.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 15:32 UTC
In reply to:

rpm40: So their target market is people who care enough about their photos to pay $100 a month rather than using their phone, but want to have zero control over them? And its centered around bulky, good looking and expensive hardware? Yikes. Just make a darn app and be done with it.

I typed "goofy looking" but somehow got autocorrected. Thing looks like a fisher price toy.

Link | Posted on Dec 27, 2016 at 20:22 UTC

So their target market is people who care enough about their photos to pay $100 a month rather than using their phone, but want to have zero control over them? And its centered around bulky, good looking and expensive hardware? Yikes. Just make a darn app and be done with it.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2016 at 18:10 UTC as 39th comment | 3 replies
On article Throwback Thursday: Game Boy Camera (70 comments in total)

Sample gallery!

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2016 at 16:11 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Throwback Thursday: Fujifilm F10 (121 comments in total)

Loved this camera. Mine was a faithful sidekick on a coast to coast trip across the USA 10 years ago. The sensor was great, the lens was good, metering was smart, and the jpeg engine was one of the best- put them together and they produce great results straight out of the camera, on full auto. I would still have it if the sensor didn't start to go on mine after a few years of hard use.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2016 at 15:12 UTC as 26th comment
On article Hands-on with the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V (237 comments in total)

...and still no touch screen? Come on Sony. Next time wait until you have enough to make the upgrade worthwhile. Their lineup is starting to look like the new iPhone cycle.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2016 at 20:28 UTC as 27th comment | 2 replies
On article 2017 Sony World Photography Awards accepting entries (49 comments in total)
In reply to:

tom1234567: Just not interested in Sony Extortion,

Tom G

I don't think that word means what you think it means...

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2016 at 18:57 UTC
On article Olympus announces PEN E-PL8 entry-level mirrorless (24 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wild Shooter: $549.99 USD. And thats entry level how?

That's just not realistic. Do you remember an ILC camera ever being released for that price? The latest rebel was $500, the Nikon d3400 was $650, the latest Nikon 1's were $450 and $650, the Sony 5100 was $550...its the going rate for an entry level system camera.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 12:39 UTC
On article Olympus announces PEN E-PL8 entry-level mirrorless (24 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wild Shooter: $549.99 USD. And thats entry level how?

What do you think it should cost?

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 01:09 UTC
In reply to:

cosinaphile: at this point in the evolution of iphone, one would think apple could provide a sensor larger than the smallest sensor in existence .i believe its about 15.5sqmm which is pathetic & much lower than the nastiest cheapest point & shoots sensors that were the bottom of the barrel... which at their nastiest and cheapest had sensors about twice the size of the iphone sensor.... the iphones iso of 25 perhaps makes sense for 1916 ... but is about a century behind in iso goodness and in 2016 is an embarrassment

an actual camera sensor of at least 30 or 40 sq mm is needed. the 41 mp sensor of nokia w pixel binning was a real step forward.. its sensor size is slightly bigger than 58mm sq about 4 times the size of an iphone camera sensor.. a 12 mp version is in my fuji x 30 & its quite nice for iq & iso latitude... its a 2\3 sensor, & its the smallest sensor i think cameras should possess...i wish samsung would use one. so 2 years later we might see one in an iphone .

I agree with you on the music angle- Iphones were not a great platform anymore for audio, and now the loss of the headphone jack. I use Bluetooth headphones anyway so I don't care, but I know I'm not getting the best sound out of them. Apple has been putting less and less effort into the audio since the first Ipod. I thought maybe it would start to change with their purchase of Beats Audio, but now this headphone thing. I have heard they are pushing Beats wireless- maybe they are realizing that is the only way to get most people to pay more than a few bucks for a pair of headphones....

But seriously, lay off the rants. Worst in class sensors? Its par for the course when talking phones. Take a look at DXO or other phone sensor comparisons, sometimes Samsung or sony gives a slight step up but they are just fine- so close that it really depends whose hardware is the newest. Nothing attracts thieves better? It is not a reasonable criticism of a brand that their products are desirable.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 13:37 UTC
In reply to:

Sir Nick of High Point: Awesome! A small format camera that can simulate bokeh (maybe) for only $769. Of course I'm being funny, but it's true :)

Yeah, but in your pocket. IF you want a pocket rocket Sony's rx100 iv costs $950 and up. :P

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2016 at 14:35 UTC
In reply to:

me_tarzan: It might sound trivial but the headphone jack is an issue for me. Yes, there's the adaptor but it means you can't charge the phone and listen at the same time.
Not having a removable battery is a big issue too. When the phone goes wrong, I want to be able to cut its power. I don't want to be forced to wait until it decides it's time to restart.
That's why I haven't upgraded my Samsung Note 4. I've taken some superb pictures with my cellphone,,so I don't need to be conning about how good these little devices are. I still have a DSLR. The weight and size makes me feel a little more confident. A bit like the photographer with the huge wood and brass plate camera. It's big, so it must be good!

I love that my new laptop doesn't have a cd/dvd drive. More space for useful stuff.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2016 at 14:33 UTC
In reply to:

Don Karner: Someday I might have to buy one of these new-fangled smartphone thingies.......

Naw.

Try it, you'll like it. My father just got an iPhone 6, and by day 2 he was telling me ne couldn't believe what he was missing.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2016 at 14:32 UTC
In reply to:

cosinaphile: at this point in the evolution of iphone, one would think apple could provide a sensor larger than the smallest sensor in existence .i believe its about 15.5sqmm which is pathetic & much lower than the nastiest cheapest point & shoots sensors that were the bottom of the barrel... which at their nastiest and cheapest had sensors about twice the size of the iphone sensor.... the iphones iso of 25 perhaps makes sense for 1916 ... but is about a century behind in iso goodness and in 2016 is an embarrassment

an actual camera sensor of at least 30 or 40 sq mm is needed. the 41 mp sensor of nokia w pixel binning was a real step forward.. its sensor size is slightly bigger than 58mm sq about 4 times the size of an iphone camera sensor.. a 12 mp version is in my fuji x 30 & its quite nice for iq & iso latitude... its a 2\3 sensor, & its the smallest sensor i think cameras should possess...i wish samsung would use one. so 2 years later we might see one in an iphone .

I would have agreed with you a few years ago, but now I see that raw sensor size is a brute force solution, and clever alternatives are possible. The old saying "there's no replacement for displacement" is still true, but the question is whether it is necessary. I traded my m4/3 kit for a g7x because it was smaller, simpler, and 'close enough' in IQ in most situations. Technology has advanced to the point that cell phones are 'good enough' for a big portion of people. It will continue to advance on multiple fronts simultaneously, with better sensors, more powerful processors, and more creative tech like this multiple lens setup. You don't see too many people today shouting "medium format or bust!" How many will moving on from shouting the same about 35mm in 10 years?

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2016 at 13:43 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: the Samsung NV10 (75 comments in total)
In reply to:

LJ - Eljot: That last picture is actually really good. The IQ is also good enough for only screen size. If you enlarge it to 1:1 it looks very blury.

F12.3 on that size sensor- is that right? If so no wonder its so soft. Still, kind of nice- almost looks like a painting.

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2016 at 17:01 UTC

AA batteries would be nice for something like this- kids never want to wait for something to charge, and there are always rechargeable AAs around with all the toys. Nikon still puts them in some of their cheap compacts, I think it would make sense here.

Maybe even internal memory instead of a loseable/breakable card?

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2016 at 14:43 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

FRANCISCO ARAGAO: 4.7 x 3.5 mm sensor?? Nonsense!

Cheap, allows for a smaller camera, good enough. I think using a phone sensor here is a good idea.

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2016 at 14:37 UTC
In reply to:

The Squire: Cool. I was looking for a camera for a 2 y.o a couple of years back and it was really hard to find anything that was simple and durable that wasn't an out and out toy (i.e. a VGA resolution pile of garbage sensor).

Yes, even a 2 y.o. cares about IQ when she's used to viewing photos on an iPad.

I probably would have gone for something like this, so long as the UX is really simple.

I think a max video length option would be nice. Just set it to 30 seconds or 1 minute and that should be plenty for most kids. Chances are they will loose interest by the end of a minute, and this would prevent the time from running and filling up the card.

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2016 at 14:35 UTC

Getty is slimey. I have had several clients threatened with legal action seeking payouts for accidental or fair-use uses of Getty online images. All coordinated by Getty bots who scan search engines looking for cash grabs. Glad to see someone is giving them a taste of their own medicine!

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2016 at 19:02 UTC as 87th comment
Total: 434, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »