redhed17

redhed17

Lives in United Kingdom Liverpool, United Kingdom
Has a website at http://500px.com/redhed17
Joined on Nov 6, 2003

Comments

Total: 40, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Sony SLT a99 II Review (1513 comments in total)
In reply to:

redhed17: Am I being dim, or have I missed how large the Buffer is for the 12fps?

I've just gone and looked at the original a99II announcement and could see no mention of it either. :-/

Why no mention of that in a review or announcement? They do that for pretty much every camera. :-/

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2017 at 11:45 UTC
On article Sony SLT a99 II Review (1513 comments in total)
In reply to:

redhed17: Am I being dim, or have I missed how large the Buffer is for the 12fps?

I've just gone and looked at the original a99II announcement and could see no mention of it either. :-/

In the case of an initial announcement or a camera review statistics matter, because if a camera doesn't seem to have the features you're after, then you won't even consider it. :-/

Nice to know that there is a large enough Buffer for you, but why no information about Buffer depth, with whatever file type/size/compression in the intial announcement or the review?

If I were buying a 42Mp camera, or indeed any camera, I have had, I wouldn't/didn't shoot at a lower resolution, each to there own though. :-)

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2017 at 01:35 UTC
On article Sony SLT a99 II Review (1513 comments in total)
In reply to:

redhed17: Am I being dim, or have I missed how large the Buffer is for the 12fps?

I've just gone and looked at the original a99II announcement and could see no mention of it either. :-/

Thanks Brendon, I did track some numbers down on the Sony site, where they also don't make it too clear what is possible, but why was it mentioned nowhere in the initial announcement or more importantly an actual review?

I can understand a manufacturer emphasizing other aspects if certain features are not as good or competitive as other brands but why no mention in a review? Again, if I have missed it please someone point it out.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2017 at 12:59 UTC
On article Sony SLT a99 II Review (1513 comments in total)

Am I being dim, or have I missed how large the Buffer is for the 12fps?

I've just gone and looked at the original a99II announcement and could see no mention of it either. :-/

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2017 at 23:28 UTC as 208th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Kona Mike: I'll bet Adobe will NEVER lower a subscription price because of 'fluctuating foreign exchange rates'

I bow to your superior knowledge, :-) but I see sales and promotions as ways to stimulate sales, rather than pass on savings to customers, and many times to clear stock before a new model is released in the case of hardware. If the price savings were the case then more company's would be offering similar sales or promotions at the same time to stay competitive. And wouldn't it be better to offer permanent price increases when the currency fluctuations could warrant it! What do I know though as only a customer. :-)

I must admit that it has taken Adobe longer to raise their prices than I thought they would, though I think that may have had something to do with the initial pricing they introduced for the renting of their products, the backlash, and finding price levels that many people were comfortable with. Because of that I think any large price hikes like this could affect their subscriptions. Time will tell. Thankfully their are more options to hopefully keep their prices lowish.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2017 at 17:50 UTC
In reply to:

Kona Mike: I'll bet Adobe will NEVER lower a subscription price because of 'fluctuating foreign exchange rates'

Sales and Promotions are usually to stimulate business rather that reward customers, but if you think any Sales and Promotions are from generous companies then carry on. ;-)

I'm not sure I have seen any company reduce prices because of currency fluctuations. ;-)

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2017 at 18:07 UTC
On article Hands-on with Ricoh's compact Pentax KP (632 comments in total)

The spec list says 7fps but slide 13 says the maximum rate is 6fps. Which is it? :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 22:52 UTC as 186th comment

Aesthetically, that is an ugly looking camera imho. I know, depends on the image quality, but for now, urggh. lol

The mirror box looks huge from above, unless the rest of the body is quite small.

USB 2 in 2017! :-/

No 4k in 2017 too!

Why say "Optical viewfinder with nearly 100% field of view" You say it is 95% at one point, why not say 95% there? I would 98% upwards is nearly 100%. Anyone doing a quick scan may only see the 100% and viewfinder in the text.

390 images from a battery charge, is there a 1 missing from the front of that? I would expect such battery performance from a CSC/Bridge/Compact.

The different grips seem an intriguing idea, and it will be interesting to see what they come up with.

The stuff using the sensor shift tech could be good too. :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 22:35 UTC as 69th comment
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1605 comments in total)
In reply to:

redhed17: Mmm, I'm not sure about the emphasis on the 9fps without the AF. I don't see other camera specs being shown with the higher non AF frame rate first, yet that is what you compare on the first page with the other cameras.

Very few image bursts will be wanted without changing the focus and/or exposure. On the Specs page (2) there is no mention that the 9fps has locked AF and Exposure, as the normal fps rate with AF is not even mentioned. That could be very misleading.

I didn't see the non AF burst rate of 16fps on the 1DXII as the headline figure above the 14fps with AF. Is it different for mirrorless?

As an aside, no 4k video! I don't do video, but for a camera in 2016 not to have 4k video seems like a bad move imho.

Of course there are situations where continuous focusing, and indeed AF, may needed, but such situations are in a minority for most people. I don't think many sports photographers and wildlife photographers are not using the AF whilst taking pictures of their subjects.

As I said, emphasising a larger fps mode without AF doesn't seem right just because it is a mirrorless camera, it wasn't done for the Canon 1DXII or the Nikon D5.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 18:53 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1605 comments in total)
In reply to:

redhed17: Mmm, I'm not sure about the emphasis on the 9fps without the AF. I don't see other camera specs being shown with the higher non AF frame rate first, yet that is what you compare on the first page with the other cameras.

Very few image bursts will be wanted without changing the focus and/or exposure. On the Specs page (2) there is no mention that the 9fps has locked AF and Exposure, as the normal fps rate with AF is not even mentioned. That could be very misleading.

I didn't see the non AF burst rate of 16fps on the 1DXII as the headline figure above the 14fps with AF. Is it different for mirrorless?

As an aside, no 4k video! I don't do video, but for a camera in 2016 not to have 4k video seems like a bad move imho.

Well that's stupid isn't it. :-/

Are mirrorless users in the habit of taking a burst of pics of things that don't move?

I think I would want, and expect, the burst rate with AF to be the important and most prominent figure.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 16:34 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1605 comments in total)

Mmm, I'm not sure about the emphasis on the 9fps without the AF. I don't see other camera specs being shown with the higher non AF frame rate first, yet that is what you compare on the first page with the other cameras.

Very few image bursts will be wanted without changing the focus and/or exposure. On the Specs page (2) there is no mention that the 9fps has locked AF and Exposure, as the normal fps rate with AF is not even mentioned. That could be very misleading.

I didn't see the non AF burst rate of 16fps on the 1DXII as the headline figure above the 14fps with AF. Is it different for mirrorless?

As an aside, no 4k video! I don't do video, but for a camera in 2016 not to have 4k video seems like a bad move imho.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 14:08 UTC as 308th comment | 4 replies
On article Fast telezoom: Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 sample images (164 comments in total)
In reply to:

noflashplease: I really don't see a point to this crop circle lens, when the 85mm F/1.4 ART is on the way. Sorry, but the days of APS-C are coming to a close.

You are aware that the 'Crop' sensor DSLRs outsell FF DSLRs by about 4-1 aren't you? You make it sound like the format is on it last legs when that is nowhere near being the case atm.

Manufacturers may want everyone to upgrade to FF, and so higher prices for cameras and the more expensive lenses that those cameras demand, but for the vast majority of people a crop sensor camera is a more suitable format. Canon and Nikon may be pushing people towards FF with the marketing and new lenses, but that leaves are large market for the 3rd party lens manufacturers, like Sigma, to take advantage of, if Canikon are targeting the top of the market. Sigma seem to be the company coming with innovation and hopefully quality.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 20:02 UTC
On article Nikon offers free battery exchange for D500 owners (104 comments in total)

This seems to treating the effect rather than the cause, which it seems is the camera. If this was a known issue, why was it not mentioned at any time until people started complaining?

Why did they not give the battery a new model number? They have done it before with the EN-EL3e.

If I can be informed about a seemingly minor Firmware update, why have Nikon not informed all registered D500 users of this battery replacement policy? Not everyone reads DPReview. ;-)

As usual Nikon seem to be releasing cameras with minor problems that should have been found and fixed, or at least highlighted to potential buyers. What was the month delay for? It didn't seem to be about producing more cameras judging by the shortages. They should have picked this battery issue, and the problem with some Lexar SD cards before release, and maybe a few other things some people are experiencing. Cameras locking up? Should not be happening in any camera imho. Thankfully only happened to me once. So far.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2016 at 15:05 UTC as 6th comment

It sounds like a dream come true, to be a fan, and then to be asked to take pictures of the artist you admire. And then produce work that is appreciated by that artist. It can't get much better than that. Very good uplifting article at such a sad time.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2016 at 03:19 UTC as 40th comment
In reply to:

redhed17: I was at The Photography Show in the UK and during a demonstration of the D5 and D500, and the Nikon Rep said that the AF Fine Tune should be done at 30x the focal length of the lens. I asked after the demo what happens with a zoom lens, and he said that you should do it at 30x the focal length that you most use.

There is not much detail about the AF Fine Tune in the Nikon manual, so which is the correct way, the DPReview way, or what the Nikon Rep said? :-/ It will be interesting to try it for myself.

Thanks for the reply Rishi. I think a Nikon Rep stating the 30x the focal length, and confirming that when questioned must mean something. :-/ That Nikon are so vague in their manual is very poor. Has DPReview been in touch with Nikon as to the technicalities of their AF Fine Tune?

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 09:29 UTC

I was at The Photography Show in the UK and during a demonstration of the D5 and D500, and the Nikon Rep said that the AF Fine Tune should be done at 30x the focal length of the lens. I asked after the demo what happens with a zoom lens, and he said that you should do it at 30x the focal length that you most use.

There is not much detail about the AF Fine Tune in the Nikon manual, so which is the correct way, the DPReview way, or what the Nikon Rep said? :-/ It will be interesting to try it for myself.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 01:49 UTC as 86th comment | 2 replies
On article Picasa will be phased out in favor of Google Photos (154 comments in total)

So sad that they are doing this because it is an excellent bit of software. :-( Apps are one thing, and there are hundreds, probably thousands that can do editing on tablets and phones, but I'd rather edit images on a computer.

For total beginners, Picasa does almost everything they want/need. And it is non destructive too, which makes it ideal for beginners. I can show someone how to use it all in about two hours, and there is not many software programs you can do that with, never mind imaging programs.

They seem to emphasize that they are replacing the storage side of it, while ignoring the editing part of what is being lost.

Google has a tendency to ditch things, so I wouldn't rely on them solely for something.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2016 at 02:08 UTC as 46th comment | 1 reply
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

redhed17: Is it not coming out in the UK?

No UK price from DPReview, and no mention on the Nikon UK site.

B&H have it for £1,360.92, which would certainly be a very good price. I assume it will be more, 'if' it comes to the UK. :-/

It is very weird though, 1st not being on the Nikon UK site with the other announcements.

2nd not having £ +/or € prices in the press release.

3rd, I have received no emails from any UK stores offering it for sale, of which I normally have about 3-4 different stores emailing within an hour of any announcement here. :-/

It will be coming to me in the UK one way or another. ;-)

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 01:47 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

redhed17: Is it not coming out in the UK?

No UK price from DPReview, and no mention on the Nikon UK site.

Thanks Richard, it just seems odd that they have everything else on the Nikon UK site they announced today, apart from the D500.

And I think there is normally a £ and maybe € price mentioned in a lot of Press Releases. :-/

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 00:20 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)

Is it not coming out in the UK?

No UK price from DPReview, and no mention on the Nikon UK site.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 23:19 UTC as 203rd comment | 6 replies
Total: 40, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »