Lynn876

Joined on Apr 3, 2013

Lynn876's recent activity

  • I just bought a camera on Craig's list. It came with a lens I didn't want and I traded the cheap lens for cleaning supplies at a camera store. The guy I bought the camera from is a family man, he ...
  • I would really recommend Topaz "detail" as well if you're into crisp and detailed without over sharpening.. I change midtones first in "clarity" but anything with that control will work. Then ...
  • thanks cube! Yes, I've noticed I can barely work on photos in a large folder..
  • It's not just the highlights. As you can see. The whole image has the quality of a reduced byte JPG. In fact I'm guessing that is what is being worked on in the work space- a JPG. I think it's very ...
  • Resolution. Not sharpness.
  • Thank you!!
  • Naththo, Yes, I see what you mean. It does an excellent job of that. Do you know if there is a way to save your own preset in DXO 9? I'd like to tweek the standard and save a preset, but can't find ...
  • BTW, DXO did do some automatic corrections. I undid them for the comparisons. It does still seem to do a slight color saturation and a slight contrast enhancement- but even accounting for that the ...
  • See my response above. It's OK, but not for fine processing. Like if you wanted to blow it up and put it in a gallery. I suppose it would work well for portraits where you don't necessarily want a ...
  • Less resolution. Compared with DXO Pro Optics 9, Nikon's View NX-2, and open source Raw Therapee. I'd rate them this way; 1. DXO 9 2. View NX-2 3. Raw Therapee 4. On1 On1 has less resolution by ...
  • Thank you, that is really helpful. I'll be trying it later.
  • I just downloaded the free DXO pro optics 9 today and really like it. I like it better than ViewNX and much much better than Adobe. I'll stick with it because I think it will do larger files but ...
  • WOW! downloaded and with the first quick try I like it. It seems to render slightly better on out of focus areas by interpretation, & the lens correction on color aberration is nice. I don't ...
  • I downloaded the new version (Feb 2017) and am not happy with it. The RAW rendering engine is awful IMO. I didn't bother comparing JPG. Unless they completely revamp the rendering the program ...
  • Topaz plugin filters are really good too. Just filters- not RAW editor, but I love them.
  • Yes. & computer and OS are fast. Win7 pro & 16G Ram etc. So I guess it's not slow. I don't remember if I downloaded it. Will do so and give it a try. Thanks!
  • WOW! Thank you! I downloaded another program: the open source RAW program last night and it was good, but not quite as good as Nikon's. It took me a while to see exactly what was different. I'm ...
  • I think DxO Optics Pro 9 is a paid for program isn't it? If I remember it's expensive. Do they have a free RAW editor? Are Capture NX-2 and ViewNX-2 related? I love ViewNX-2 but it is slow as ...
  • In Photoshop's converter I tried a few settings and wasn't happy. I'll have to try them again when I have more time. RawTherapee looks interesting. I'm pretty done with testing tonight, but will ...
  • Not sure. I think I downloaded it and tried it. Is it a bit slow?
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
Lynn876 has not added any gear yet.
Total messages 32
Threads started 5
Last post 1 month ago
Total comments 0
Total likes 0
Total reviews 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 0