Dames01

Lives in Germany Germany
Joined on Mar 18, 2010

Comments

Total: 102, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

It ain't what you got it's the way that you use it... ;-)

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2017 at 18:48 UTC as 15th comment

Leica it or not.... it's great publicity for Leica!

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 21:58 UTC as 53rd comment
On article Canon EOS M6 Review (380 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mariano Pacifico: Why bother with M6 or M5 when you can get a Canon APS-C for the same price with exemplary lenses?

M5 and M6 are APS-C without the bulk of the DSLR.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2017 at 16:51 UTC

One lens: 35mm,... two bodies: APS-C and FF.

Great shot Barney!

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2017 at 11:50 UTC as 229th comment | 3 replies
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (147 comments in total)

Only just shipping and already a classic!

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 19:13 UTC as 11th comment
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1644 comments in total)
In reply to:

tallenvt: Help me out here, please. I have good Canon lenses and was hoping to cut down on size and weight by buying a mirrorless Canon, when the company released a decent one. I assumed [stupidly, i now see] that I would be able to use my Canon L lenses on a mirrorless Canon. From what i now read, I will need an adapter. So, do i actually get much of a size/weight advantage over say the 80D? And do i loose autofocus or other performance qualities when I use adapted L lenses with the M5. I REALLY dont want to have to buy 2 sets of lenses.

The adapter is necessary because the point of mirrorless is to reduce the size of the camera body. The side effect of this is that the lenses can be placed a lot closer to the sensor. However the EF lenses are designed for DSLRs where they are much further away from the sensor.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 16:39 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1644 comments in total)
In reply to:

lol101: Any idea of VF magnification?

EVF magnification is 0.62.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 16:27 UTC
On article Canon EOS M5: What you need to know (564 comments in total)

Weight comparison
M5 + ef-m ef adapter + ef 16-35 f4 L is = 1151g
6300 + zeiss 16-35 f4 = 921g

So yes there is a difference, but let's be honest, once you start to look at bright lenses mirrorless is not light either.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 17:49 UTC as 77th comment | 3 replies
On article Canon EOS M5: What you need to know (564 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris2210: Build quality is "top notch" really? - did I misread your spec sheet earlier that mentioned plastic construction and no weather sealing? Which other camera on the market at this price point doesn't at least have an alloy chassis or weather resistance?

There are things to like about this camera, but there's an awful lot more that's underwhelming [or late to market] for something that isn't entry-level priced. Your breakdown read like it could have been supplied by Canon. I don't normally think there's any sort of bias on this site, so I find this a little bit concerning...

Spec sheet says that the body is made of metal.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 16:59 UTC
On article Canon EOS M5: What you need to know (564 comments in total)

Essentially this is an 80D with half of the bulk and weight: 40% less! I was thinking of getting another lighter set-up from Fuji or Panasonic for travelling light, but with the adapter I should be able to use all of my EF lenses with minimal performance penalties...

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 13:28 UTC as 112th comment | 3 replies
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1644 comments in total)
In reply to:

damian5000: Any news about intervalometer yet?

Timelapse is supported

Have a look at this around 6:35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0If-yw2AOI&feature=youtu.be

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 12:43 UTC
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (805 comments in total)

Just in time for my 50th birthday !

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2016 at 07:50 UTC as 131st comment
In reply to:

Dames01: "Unfortunately, the ring around the lens barrel of the DL24-85 is not customizable (same goes for the other DL's). It can only be used for manual focusing."

That is really disappointing... :-( would have been nice to be able to use to set the Aperture, Shutter speed, etc.

@otzurert: as stated in the product announcement "Macro shooters can also take advantage of focus peaking and bracketing as well as manual priority AF."

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 13:49 UTC
In reply to:

Dames01: "Unfortunately, the ring around the lens barrel of the DL24-85 is not customizable (same goes for the other DL's). It can only be used for manual focusing."

That is really disappointing... :-( would have been nice to be able to use to set the Aperture, Shutter speed, etc.

@papa natas: I think you have misunderstood my comment.

AF is a wonderful thing, and the only time I use MF is for macro work, which is why I think it is a shame that the ring on the lens cannot be assigned to another function, depending on the shooting mode, or customised by the user like on the Canon GX series.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 13:40 UTC

"Unfortunately, the ring around the lens barrel of the DL24-85 is not customizable (same goes for the other DL's). It can only be used for manual focusing."

That is really disappointing... :-( would have been nice to be able to use to set the Aperture, Shutter speed, etc.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 13:25 UTC as 136th comment | 11 replies

Love the design... very Canon like :-) but more polished, and the specs tick a lot of boxes too.

Nice to be able to add an external EVF.

Looking forward to see some image samples.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 07:39 UTC as 123rd comment
In reply to:

Vincent DP: When I look at this picture I see people illegally crossing a state border (there is no war in Serbia or Hungary, so no need to flee through barbed wire) and endangering the health of a baby, part of a mass invasion jeopardizing the future of Europe.

It is narrow minded people like Vincent DP who are jeopardising the future of Europe.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 18:00 UTC
In reply to:

SupremeWideAngle: Canon did a very big mistake to bottom-hinged the monitor, useless for macro and many other photography situations !!! Try again Canon, you are on your way down !

The tilt options are: 180° up and 45° down. So in fact there are two hinges, like the screen on the G1X mkII.

So the screen is macro, concert and selfie friendly :-)

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 15:54 UTC
In reply to:

uzzy88: What about G1x Mark II?

Great camera, but the RAW shooting rate is a bit low and focus is also sometimes diffidult in poor lighting conditions. It is also frustrating that the remote shooting do not allow the user to select the focus point remotely.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 13:25 UTC

If Canon puts these improvements into the G1X mk III, it will be the best walkaround camera...

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 13:13 UTC as 43rd comment | 1 reply
Total: 102, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »