Superka

Lives in USSR (former) USSR (former)
Works as a Architect
Has a website at http://superka-photo.com/
Joined on Jun 22, 2009

Comments

Total: 286, showing: 201 – 220
« First‹ Previous910111213Next ›Last »
On article Just Posted: Sigma SD1 / SD1 Merrill review (374 comments in total)

I understood now what is is the camera of my dream. It is Leica with Foveon sensor. They match each other perfectly.
Who thinks so too?

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2012 at 02:06 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply

4K TO THE PEOPLE!
I only hope 4K from 1D C wouldn''t be so blurry as 1080p from current DSLR.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2012 at 15:15 UTC as 25th comment
On article Canon working on Cinema EOS C500 4K professional rig (90 comments in total)
In reply to:

plasnu: This is something that Nikon has to follow.

Nikon cannot make cinema cameras. Nikon don''t produce sensors. No need in Nikon cine cameras, because Sony makes them.
I wish Nikon resume the production of film scanners. That what Nikon is capable of.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2012 at 14:40 UTC
On article Canon working on Cinema EOS C500 4K professional rig (90 comments in total)
In reply to:

vFunct: Pretty sure Nikon will have something like this over the next few years... they DID invent dSLR video (Nikon D90) after all.

Who knows, maybe they'll have it before the C500 comes out.

One thing these camera needs is power zoom. This would be immensely useful for ENG cameramen, so you don't need a separate focus puller.

Nikon didn''t invent DSLR. And Nikon won''t have something like this Cinema Camera. Nikon don''t have sensor production.
So, Sony will have smth like this. F65 is already cool, but somewhat big and heave.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:55 UTC

Ok. But what about EOS 70D with 4K. Or at least 1080p but not so blurry as now.
I don''t have 10K euro.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2012 at 09:37 UTC as 34th comment
On article Just Posted: Sigma SD1 / SD1 Merrill review (374 comments in total)

Would be great if camera keeps not 45Mpx RAW, but convert them by processor to OpenEXR 16bit half float point. What for to keep 45Mpx? No Demosaic needed.
FF would be great in future. I''m really impressed by perfect resolution. Thanks Foveon for their perfectionism.

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2012 at 18:44 UTC as 26th comment
On article Just Posted: Sigma SD1 / SD1 Merrill review (374 comments in total)

This camera is made by perfectionists for perfectionists

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2012 at 13:49 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies
On article Just Posted: Sigma SD1 / SD1 Merrill review (374 comments in total)

I never have seen such perfect resolution on digital.
On those color balls it better then Nikon D800! Wow!

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2012 at 12:22 UTC as 51st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Superka: I would prefer my Helios-40 for filming.

First of all Helios 44 is Biotar copy, not Helios-40
Secondly - why not bye a perfect copy for just 50$?
http://youtu.be/tSQfbJ2sF8s?t=2m45s
Here is Helios-44, which I love as Helios-40

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2012 at 00:27 UTC

I would prefer my Helios-40 for filming.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2012 at 20:53 UTC as 17th comment | 3 replies
On article Dan Chung posts 5D Mark III vs. D800 video shootout (203 comments in total)

I hope the next generation of DSLR would be able to able to record video with all of their pixels, combining 4 RGBG pixels in one video pixel, as digital Cinema cameras do.

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2012 at 19:10 UTC as 54th comment
On article Dan Chung posts 5D Mark III vs. D800 video shootout (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dannyboy292: The test is not right...use a canon lens on the canon and the Nikon equivalent on the Nikon, canon users shoot with canon lenses not Nikon!

I shoot with USSR Helios lenses, which are much more perfect then any Canon, Nikon, etc.. lenses. I love Canon for the possobility to put everything on it.

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2012 at 18:58 UTC
On article Dan Chung posts 5D Mark III vs. D800 video shootout (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

IcyVeins: Canon loses again...yawn

Read the article first

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2012 at 18:56 UTC
On article Dan Chung posts 5D Mark III vs. D800 video shootout (203 comments in total)

Shooting squirrels handheld at long focal length is good test of rolling shutter.
In other aspects it is a good and interesting review.

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2012 at 18:55 UTC as 58th comment
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published (287 comments in total)
In reply to:

Oleg Rostovtsev: I did iso comparison of 5d mark 3 with raw files to download.
This is not a professional test, but I can say for me personally, it's two stops iso difference.
http://www.rostovtsev.de/de/blog/canon-5d-mark-3-iso-test-und-raw-files.html

There are lots of professional test in the web. In English.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2012 at 03:35 UTC
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published (287 comments in total)
In reply to:

Milimike: IMHO, the 5D MKIII has the best colors and contrast overall.

Canon always much more realistic in colors.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2012 at 03:33 UTC
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published (287 comments in total)
In reply to:

Durandalfr: In term of pure noise, there is an improvement over 5DMk2, but against the D800... reduced at the same size, the D800 has in overall better noise than the 5D3 and we shouldn't talk about the monstruous D4.... I'm a canon fan but how the hell canon isn't able to equal nikon which, as I read somewhere on DPR, isn't manufacturing his own sensors (Sony)?

If you downscale any camera to Nikon D700 size, you would see that they are the same. It is not about noise only.
Canon can do 6fps - fps alone is a strong reason to leave 22Mpx against pixel boost. Not everyone need 36Mpx. And those, who needs great resolution actually use Large Format cameras, as I do (160Mpx equav). We need digital for speed! So, 5Dm3 is appeared to be greatly balanced camera!

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2012 at 23:50 UTC
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published (287 comments in total)
In reply to:

kuklukklak: 5D3 vs D800 Raw: Same noise at <1600. From 3200 the 5d3 is about 1/2 stop better.

But a big surprise as both are well beaten by the D700 regarding to noise.

And the D3s is still the lowlight king.

Waiting for the 1DX.

at least 1.5 stop better new 5D is over new Nikon.

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2012 at 16:58 UTC
On article Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published (287 comments in total)

Concerning the resolution - DPReview studio seems to be outdated to see the difference :) Really need to shoot distant trees at infinity to see the expected difference. 5D M3 shines at high ISO here (even better then Nikon D700!), but I''m suprised how good Nikon D800 at high ISO too, even delivering some little more details then Canon, though these details are seen through noise.
Definitely these cameras are different now, both performs very good.

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2012 at 15:34 UTC as 68th comment | 1 reply

That's a great time to shoot video!
Those who cares about drop resistance... don't drop it! Or put a sock on it and you'll get your resistance. Put two socks for extra mountain-climbing resistance.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2012 at 03:02 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
Total: 286, showing: 201 – 220
« First‹ Previous910111213Next ›Last »